World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of the Convergence Angle in Full-crown Abutment Teeth prepared by the Preclinical and Senior Students in Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran

Shima Ghasemi, Payam Mireskandari, Tahereh Ghaffari, Amir R Babaloo

Citation Information : Ghasemi S, Mireskandari P, Ghaffari T, Babaloo AR. Comparison of the Convergence Angle in Full-crown Abutment Teeth prepared by the Preclinical and Senior Students in Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran. World J Dent 2017; 8 (2):77-80.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1416

Published Online: 00-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

One of the main factors in the successful treatment of fixed prosthodontics is preparation of the teeth such that proper retention of the crown is provided. The aim of the study was to compare the convergence angle in full-crown abutment teeth prepared by the preclinic and senior students in the Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional/analytical study was conducted on dental students in the Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran in 2016. The sample size was determined randomly at n = 30 for each group. Preparation angle for each specimen was measured and recorded by digital photographs and Autocad software. The results were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests.

Results

The results showed that preclinic and senior students prepared the anterior teeth with average values of 22.13 ± 9.59 to 18.53 ± 8.87° and 18.46 ± 11.08 to 14.6 ± 6.32° respectively, from the buccolingual and mesiodistal aspects. Concerning posterior teeth, preclinic and senior students prepared them with average values of 21.4 ± 10.24 to 22.46 ± 8.99° and 19.46 ± 8.09 to 21.13 ± 8.83° respectively. Although the average value of convergence angle in both aspects was higher for preclinic students than for the senior students, t-test for independent groups revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Either preclinic or senior students prepared the teeth with a convergence angle, i.e., higher than ideal. However, all the recorded angles were within the range of previous studies.

How to cite this article

Ghasemi S, Mireskandari P, Ghanizadeh M, Ghaffari T, Babaloo AR. Comparison of the Convergence Angle in Full-crown Abutment Teeth prepared by the Preclinical and Senior Students in Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran. World J Dent 2017;8(2):77-80.


PDF Share
  1. Comparison of convergence angle of prepared teeth for full veneer metal ceramic crowns. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011 Jan;21(1):15-18.
  2. Comparison of convergence angles achieved in posterior teeth prepared for full veneer crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005 Sep;13(3):100-104.
  3. Abutment taper of full cast crown preparations by dental students in the UWI School of Dentistry. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2006 Jun;14(2):63-66.
  4. Taper of full-veneer crown preparations by dental students at the University of the West Indies. J Prosthodont 2010 Oct;19(7):580-585.
  5. An in vitro study to evaluate the retention of complete crowns prepared with five different tapers and luted with two different cements. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2010 Jun;10(2):89-95.
  6. The American textbook of operative dentistry. 6th ed. New York: Lea and Febiger; 1926. p. 381.
  7. Taper of clinical preparations for cast restorations. Quintessence Int 1988 May;19(5):339-345.
  8. Assessment and comparison of convergence angle of tooth preparations for fullveneer crowns among practitioners with different levels of experience. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res 2014;1:7-10.
  9. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Jun;89(6):565-571.
  10. The relationship between preparation convergence and retention of extracoronal retainers. J Prosthodont 1994 Jun;3(2):74-78.
  11. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001 Apr;85(4):363-376.
  12. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009 Dec;102(6):354-361.
  13. A theoretical and clinical investigation into the taper achieved on crown and inlay preparations. J Oral Rehabil 1980 May;7(3):255-265.
  14. Experimental stress analysis of dental restorations. VI. The concept of proximal reduction in compound restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1969 Dec;22(6):663-670.
  15. Students perceptions of quality in higher education. Qual Assur Educ 2003 Mar;11(1):15-20.
  16. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003 Jun;12(2):111-115.
  17. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2012. Chapter 9; p. 120-140.
  18. Axial wall convergence of full veneer crown preparations. Documented for dental students and general practitioners. Acta Odontol Scand 1996 Apr;54(2):109-112.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.