World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2014 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Matheus Coelho Bandéca, Vinicius Ibiapina Mascarenhas, Lívia Jacovassi Tavares, Lara Maria Ferreira Mendes

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, Mascarenhas VI, Tavares LJ, Mendes LM. The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review. World J Dent 2014; 5 (1):60-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1259

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Mascarenhas VI, de Molon RS, Tavares LJ, Mendes LMF, Tonetto MR, Bandeca MC. The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review. World J Dent 2014;5(1):60-63.


PDF Share
  1. Computer-guided planning and placement of dental implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2012;20(1): 53-79.
  2. An alternative method for flapless implant placement and an immediate provisional crown: a case report. J Contemp Dent Prac 2009;10(3):89-95.
  3. Computer-guided surgery in implantology: review of basic concepts. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(6):1917-1921.
  4. Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach. J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2008;66(5):1015-1021.
  5. Guided surgery for implant therapy. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2011;23(2):239
  6. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intraoral techniques. J Oral Implant 1990;16(3): 156-164.
  7. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci 2006;48(1): 27-34.
  8. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2004;19(2):228-231.
  9. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111-120.
  10. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clinical Oral Implants Research 2000;11(5):409-414.
  11. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dento Maxillofacial Radiology 2000;29(1):46-51.
  12. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computerguided template-based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009;20 Suppl 4:73-86.
  13. Computerguided implant placement in a patient with severe atrophy. The Journal of Oral Implantology 2008;34(4):203-207.
  14. Flapless implant surgery using an image-guided system. A 1-to 4-year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2010;12(2):142-152.
  15. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012;23 Suppl 6:124-135.
  16. Inpatient evaluation of periodontal, esthetic and inflammatory parameters around dental implants and natural teeth. J Contemp Dent Prac 2013;14(1):90-95.
  17. Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012.
  18. Comparison of soft tissue healing around implants in beagle dogs: flap surgery versus flapless surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 2013;115(3):e21-27.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.