World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2014 ) > List of Articles


Surface Roughness Analysis of Dental Ceramics Treated with Hydrofluoric Acid and Aluminum Oxide Jet

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Alvaro Henrique Borges, Edson Alves de Campos, Matheus Coelho Bandeca, Thiago Soares Porto, Camila Cruz Lorenzetti, Sizenando Toledo Porto Neto, Wellington Dinelli

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, Borges AH, de Campos EA, Bandeca MC, Porto TS, Lorenzetti CC, Neto ST, Dinelli W. Surface Roughness Analysis of Dental Ceramics Treated with Hydrofluoric Acid and Aluminum Oxide Jet. World J Dent 2014; 5 (1):1-5.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1248

Published Online: 01-03-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Porto TS, Tonetto MR, Lorenzetti CC, Bandéca MC, Borges AH, Neto STP, de Campos EA, Dinelli W. Surface Roughness Analysis of Dental Ceramics Treated with Hydrofluoric Acid and Aluminum Oxide Jet. World J Dent 2014;5(1):1-5.

PDF Share
  1. Degree of conversion of polymer-matrix composite assessed by FTIR analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):76-79.
  2. Surface modification for enhanced silanation of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater 2009;25(9):1116-1121.
  3. Effect of different surface treatments on In-Ceram Alumina roughness. An AFM study. J Dent 2010;38(2):118-122.
  4. Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent 2013;38(2):208-217.
  5. Effect of etchant, etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23(5):250-257.
  6. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress II. J Prosthodont 2008;17(5):409-414.
  7. The Influence of Adhesive Luting Systems on Bond Strength and Failure Mode of an Indirect Micro Ceramic Resin-based Composite Veneer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;(10)1:33-40.
  8. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress II ceramic. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27(2):262-272.
  9. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
  10. Influence of ceramic surfasse conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(6):412-417.
  11. The influence of internal surfasse treatments on tensile bond strength for two ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2007;32(5):457-465.
  12. Effect of etching and air bone particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(5):479-488.
  13. Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(1):95-101.
  14. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(3):277-284.
  15. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthetic Dent 2012; 108(4):231-237.
  16. Influence fair-abrasion and subsequent heat treatment on bonding between zirconia framework material and indirect composites. Dental Materials Journal 2012;31(5):751-757.
  17. The effect of surfasse treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of a resin luting agent and four all-ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2009;34(4):399-407.
  18. The influence of surfasse standardization of lithium disilicate glass ceramic on bond strength to a dual resin cement. Oper Dent 2001;36(5): 478-485.
  19. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements. Int J Prosthod 2000;13(3):221-226.
  20. Morphological effects of surface treatments on ceramic restorative materials. Am J Dent 2000;13(1):35-38.
  21. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dent 1998;14(4):387-392.
  22. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthod 1999;12(5):415-418.
  23. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glassinfiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthod 2001;14(4):335-339.
  24. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultramorphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface, Dent Mater 1999;15(2):105-119.
  25. Bonding brackets to porcelain—in vitro study. Braz Dent J 2002;13(3):191-196.
  26. Effect of two abrasive systems on resin bonding to laboratory-processed indirect resin composite restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(4):185-196.
  27. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crows luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(3):247-252.
  28. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13(1):28-35.
  29. Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dent Mater 2003;19(8): 693-699.
  30. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(5):540-546.
  31. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(1):77-82.
  32. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(7):758-764.
  33. Wetting characteristic of ceramic to water and adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(6):616-621.
  34. Fracture strength of three all-ceramic systems: Top-Ceram compared with IPS-Empress and In-Ceram. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(2):210-215.
  35. Comparative evaluation of resistance failure in nonprecious metal-ceramic restoration at the incisal edge with varying thickness under different application of load: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(6): 434-440.
  36. Direct laminate veneers with resin composites: two case reports with 5-year follow-ups. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010;11(4):E056-62.
  37. Indirect resin onlay cemented with self-adhesive resin cement: a comprehensive clinical overview. World J Dent 2012;3(3):273-277.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.