Citation Information :
Narvekar S, Baliga SD, Baliga SS. Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Improving the Knowledge of the Undergraduate Dental Students: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Dent 2024; 15 (10):909-912.
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the flipped classroom on knowledge improvement in undergraduate dental students. Using a crossover randomized controlled trial, we aim to compare this approach with traditional teaching methods, providing insights for optimizing dental education strategies.
Materials and methods: A total of 57 third-year dental students participated in a crossover randomized controlled trial. The students were randomly assigned to either the experimental group, where the flipped classroom method was implemented, or the control group, which followed conventional didactic teaching. The study consisted of two phases, with the groups crossing over in the second phase. Pretests and posttests were administered to assess knowledge improvement. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software.
Results: The results demonstrated that the flipped classroom method led to a significant increase in posttest scores compared to pretest scores (p < 0.0001). On the other hand, the conventional didactic method showed a nonsignificant increase in posttest scores (p = 0.22544). The students’ feedback indicated positive acceptance and satisfaction with the flipped classroom approach.
Conclusion: The flipped classroom method is more effective than conventional didactic teaching in enhancing the knowledge of undergraduate dental students. The students’ favorable perception of the flipped classroom suggests that it is a valuable and innovative approach to learning.
Clinical significance: The need for this study lies in assessing the implementation value of the flipped classroom method in dental education. The research findings highlight its superiority over traditional teaching methods for undergraduate dental students. This holds significant implications for the transformation of dental education, potentially leading to enhanced learning experiences and improved outcomes. Integrating the flipped classroom approach promises to elevate the readiness and competence of future dental professionals, potentially contributing to advancements in patient care and oral health.
Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):38. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
Day LJ. A gross anatomy flipped classroom effects performance, retention, and higher-level thinking in lower performing students. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11(6):565–574. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1772
Covill L, Cook J. Comparison of academic performance in traditional and flipped classrooms and students’ attitudes of the flipped experience. J Allied Health 2019;48(1):e1–e7. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2
Cheng X, Ka Ho Lee K, Chang EY, et al. The “flipped classroom” approach: stimulating positive learning attitudes and improving mastery of histology among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10(4):317–327. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1664
Zhang W, Gu J, Li F, et al. The effect of flipped classroom in multiple clinical skills training for clinical interns on Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE). Med Educ Online 2022;27(1):2013405. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2013405
Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ 2017;51(6): 585–597. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13272
Sait MS, Siddiqui Z, Ashraf Y. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;2(8):317–320. DOI: 10.2147/amep.s109037
Sadik AE, Abdulmonem AW. Improvement in student performance and perceptions through a flipped anatomy classroom: shifting from passive traditional to active blended learning. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14(4):482–490. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2015
Baliga SS, Walvekar PR, Mahantshetti GJ. Concept map as a teaching and learning tool for medical students. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10(1):35. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_146_20
Blair E, Chris M, Simone P. Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Educ Inf Technol 2015;21:1465–1482. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5
Lu C, Xu J, Cao Y, et al. Examining the effects of student-centered flipped classroom in physiology education. BMC medical education 2023;23(1):233. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04166-8
Aljaraideh Y. Students’ perception of flipped classroom: a case study for private universities in Jordan. J Technol Sci Educ 2019;9:368. DOI: 10.3926/jotse.648
Elledge R, Houlton S, Hackett S, et al. Flipped classrooms in training in maxillofacial surgery: preparation before the traditional didactic lecture? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56(5):384–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.04.006
Ramnanan CJ, Pound LD. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;8:63–73. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S109037
Renfei X, Mustofa A, Fang Z, et al. The implementation of flipped classroom model in CIE in the environment of non-target language. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2018. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012033
Naing C, Whittaker MA, Aung HH, et al. The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev 2023;19(3):e1339. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1339
Bock A, Heitzer M, Lemos M, et al. “Flipped OR”: a modified didactical concept for a surgical clerkship in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58(10):1245–1250. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.008
Morton DA, Colbert-Getz JM. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: the importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10(2):170–175. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1635
Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, et al. The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today 2016;38:15–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010