World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of Various Predisposing Factors and Clinical Conditions Associated with Gingival Recession in Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Study

Sidra Raza, Menaka KB

Keywords : Early detection, Early diagnosis, Epidemiology, Esthetics, Etiology, Gingival recession

Citation Information : Raza S, KB M. Assessment of Various Predisposing Factors and Clinical Conditions Associated with Gingival Recession in Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (9):796-804.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2513

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 03-01-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To assess the predisposing factors and clinical conditions associated with gingival recession (GR). Materials and methods: The study was a cross-sectional study. Individuals aged 18–40, who visited the outpatient department of periodontics between June and November 2022, underwent examination. A total of 550 subjects were examined to assess the presence of GR. Those identified with GR underwent further clinical examination. Data collection was facilitated through the utilization of a proforma. The validation of the proforma was assessed by the faculty of the institution. Results: Among the 550 individuals examined, 222 presented with GR. A majority, accounting for 79.73% of patients, exhibited RT1 type of recession. The horizontal brushing method, coupled with the use of a medium-type toothbrush, was observed to exert more injurious effects on the marginal gingiva, thereby contributing to GR. Approximately, 57.21 and 45.05% of patients reported experiencing dentinal hypersensitivity and esthetic impairment, respectively. Conclusion: Mucogingival deformities, especially GR, affect a significant number of patients. Identifying the predisposing factors is crucial for developing long-term prevention strategies for GR. Additionally, patient education and motivation are essential to guide individuals toward undergoing root-covering procedures. Clinical significance: GR typically results from the interplay of various factors. Assessing gingival biotypes is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of therapy and predicting treatment outcomes. Different gingival biotypes, such as thin or thick, can influence the response to various dental procedures. The data collected may aid in developing enduring strategies to prevent mucogingival defects and predicting the efficacy of treatment approaches. Raising awareness and educating about oral hygiene maintenance should yield lasting benefits. Emphasizing the prevention of GR should be the ultimate aim, rather than dealing with it after it has already developed.


PDF Share
  1. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol 2018;89:S204–S213. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671
  2. Merijohn GK. Management and prevention of gingival recession. Periodontol 2000 2016;71(1):228–242. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12115
  3. Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Prevalence and associated factors of gingival recession in Greek adults. J Investig Clin Dent 2013;4(3):178–185. DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12031
  4. Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, et al. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession—an epidemiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19:671–675. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.156881
  5. Toker H, Ozdemir H. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a university dental hospital in Turkey. Int J Dent Hyg 2009;7(2):115–120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00348.x
  6. Dodwad V. Etiology and severity of gingival recession among young individuals in Belgaum district in India. Ann Dent UM 2001;8:1–6. DOI: 10.22452/adum.vol8no1.1
  7. Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, et al. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(7):661–666. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x
  8. Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967;38(Suppl):610–616. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610
  9. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:428–433. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x
  10. Mirko P, Miroslav S, Lubor M. Significance of the labial frenum attachment in periodontal disease in man. Part I. Classification and epidemiology of the labial frenum attachment. J Periodontol 1974;45:891–894. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1974.45.12.891
  11. van Palenstein Helderman WH, Lembariti BS, van der Weijden GA, et al. Gingival recession and its association with calculus in subjects deprived of prophylactic dental care. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:106–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02416.x
  12. Almeida AL, Madeira LC, Freitas KC, et al. Cross–sectional evaluation of the presence of gingival recession in individuals with cleft lip and palate. J Periodontol 2007;78:29–36. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.050303
  13. Mumghamba EGS, Honkala S, Honkala E, et al. Gingival recession, oral hygiene and associated factors among Tanzanian women. East Afr Med J 2009;86:125–132. DOI: 10.4314/eamj.v86i3.54967
  14. Grover HS, Aggarwal N. Observational study on the association between gingival recession and other clinical variables in an adult population in India. Indian J Dent Sci 2012;4:1–7.
  15. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220–225. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137
  16. Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV, et al. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 2004;75:1377–1386. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1377
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.