World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Prevalence and Sexual Dimorphism of Tongue Prints in Children: A Cross-sectional Study

Ebenezer Loganathan, P Sujitha, R Kavitha, Victor Samuel A, S Rajakumar, Anand Kasi, Ivan Obadiah

Keywords : Forensic, Prevalence, Sexual dimorphism, Tongue prints

Citation Information : Loganathan E, Sujitha P, Kavitha R, Samuel A V, Rajakumar S, Kasi A, Obadiah I. Prevalence and Sexual Dimorphism of Tongue Prints in Children: A Cross-sectional Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (7):621-624.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2468

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-10-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Tongue prints are unique patterns that have garnered attention in forensic sciences and biometrics for individual identification. While extensive research has explored tongue prints in adults, limited attention has been given to the pediatric population. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the prevalence and sexual dimorphism of tongue prints in children utilizing standardized imaging techniques. Materials and methods: A sample of 500 children (250 males, 250 females), aged under 12, underwent tongue print examination. Exclusions included children with special needs, tongue malformations, and craniofacial abnormalities. Examiners were calibrated, and reliability was assessed. Tongue prints were classified based on established criteria. Statistical analysis is employed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software, examining gender differences in tongue texture, shape, longitudinal grooves, and lingual apex. Results: Physiological tongue texture predominated in both genders, with geographical and scrotal textures rare (2%). Ellipsoidal patterns were prevalent in females (54%), while ovoid patterns dominated in males (44%). Pentagonal patterns were universal (10%), and trapezoidal patterns were rare (2%) in males. Longitudinal grooves were perceptive and superficial in both genders. A sharp lingual apex was common (98% in females, 80% in males), with septate patterns observed in 20% of males and 2% of females. Statistical differences were found in tongue texture (p = 0.31) and lingual apex (p = 0.045). Conclusion: Unique tongue prints in children hold promise for forensic applications. Sexual dimorphism in tongue prints raises questions about genetic and developmental influences. The study contributes to understanding tongue print patterns and their potential implications in personalized medicine and biometric identification. Clinical significance: This study gives an understanding of tongue prints in children, offering insights into their prevalence, sexual dimorphism, and potential applications in forensic sciences, personalized medicine, and biometric identification.


PDF Share
  1. Jeddy N, Radhika T, Nithya S. Tongue prints in biometric authentication: a pilot study. J Oral Max Pathol 2017;21(1):176. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_185_15
  2. Hauser E, Wickenhauser C, Braun M, et al. The tongue as an identification tool in forensic medicine: a feasibility study using biometric surface tongue scans and 3D-imaging. Int J Leg Med 2006;120(6):359–365. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-006-0087-1
  3. Nayak. Forensic odontology: a boon to community. J Forensic Dent Sci 2019;11(3):120–121. DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_128_19
  4. Patil RS, Patil S, Deshmukh V. Tongue print: a unique biometric marker. J Forensic Den Sci 2015;7(2):155–159. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.154498
  5. Nimbulkar G, Patil R, Nathani S, et al. Tongue prints: a forensic review. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14(4):6802–6806. DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12688
  6. Jain AK, Ross A, Prabhakar S. An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Tech 2004;14(1):4–20. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349
  7. Bhalla A, Verma S, Kharb S. Unique identification potential of tongue prints (lingual dermal ridges): a novel biometric and forensic tool. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8(1):56–60. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.176963
  8. Stefanescu CL, Popa MF, Candea LS. Preliminary study on the tongue-based forensic identification. Rom J Leg Med 2014;22:263–266. DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2014.263
  9. Kalistu SN, Doggalli N. Gender determination by forensic odontologist: a review of various methods. J Dent Medi Sci 2016;15:78–85. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1511017885
  10. Harini G, Gheena S. Correlation of tongue prints to gender. Int J Adv Resd InnIdeas Educ 2021;7:234–238.
  11. Poojya R. Tongue prints—an information immune to forgery. Int J Biomed Sci 2023;19(1):15–17. DOI: 10.59566/IJBS.2023.19015
  12. Madhusudan A, Shipra S, Gaurav S, et al. Lingual morphology: a secure method for forensic identification. J Forensic Sci Criminal Inves 2018;9:1–5. DOI: 10.19080/JFSCI.2018.09.555759
  13. Nagalaxmi V, Ugrappa S, Naga Jyothi M, et al. Cheiloscopy, palatoscopy and odontometrics in sex prediction and dis-crimination—a comparative trial. Open Dent J 2015;8:269–279. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601408010269
  14. Gehi S, Jain D, Gupta A. Study of tongue morphology in central India population: a budding tool in forensic odontology. I J Inn Sci Res Tech 2021;6(2):83–90.
  15. Surendra L, Haragannavar VC, Rao RS, et al. Visualization of tongue morphology: an emerging mode of personal identification. World J Dent 2020;11:501–505. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1770
  16. Huang B, Wu J, Zhang D, et al. Tongue shape classification by geometric features. Inf Sci NY 2010;180:312–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.09.016
  17. Abraham J, Binita G, Sandra EJ. A morphological trial of tongue and its role in forensics odontology. J Forensic Sci Criminal Invest 2018;7:1–5. DOI: 10.19080/JFSCI.2018.07.555723
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.