World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Risk Factors Associated with Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Case–Control Study

Paromita Mazumdar, Shamik Datta

Keywords : Bruxism, Carbonated beverages, Multifactorial, Noncarious cervical lesions, Teeth brushing

Citation Information : Mazumdar P, Datta S. Risk Factors Associated with Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Case–Control Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (7):592-598.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2462

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-10-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The current retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the relationship between occlusal factors, toothbrushing habits, and acidic food and beverage consumption with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Materials and methods: The study sample included 200 people in Panihati, West Bengal, ranging in age from 15 to 70 years. In an initial clinical evaluation, 100 cases were chosen that showed one or more teeth with noncarious cervical wear. A skilled dentist performed occlusal examinations and periodontal probing on all patients and controls. The subjects were invited to fill out a self-administered questionnaire about their daily food, habits, and health. Data were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Only bristle type, brushing technique, frequency of soft-drink consumption, brushing with dentifrices, and self-reported bruxism enhance the propensity of NCCLs in the univariate regression model. The strongest predictive model was created by combining bristle type, brushing technique, frequency of acidic drink consumption, and brushing teeth with dentifrices after meals. However, it only accurately identifies 80% of subjects. Conclusion: Bristle type, brushing technique, frequency of acidic drink consumption, and brushing teeth with dentifrices after meals are a few of the risk factors associated with NCCLs. Clinical significance: Noncarious cervical lesion has a multifactorial etiology. This study highlights a few of the vital risk factors, and it is advisable for clinicians to take them into account while diagnosing and treating patients.


PDF Share
  1. Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, et al. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: erosive tooth wear–diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1557–1561. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1511-7
  2. Kitasako Y, Ikeda M, Takagaki T, et al. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with or without erosive etiological factors among adults of different ages in Tokyo. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6939–6947. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03984-8
  3. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res 2004;38(Suppl 1):34–44. DOI: 10.1159/000074360
  4. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:10–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x
  5. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, et al. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent 2008;36:759–766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.004
  6. Pikdöken L, Akca E, Gürbüzer B, et al. Cervical wear and occlusal wear from a periodontal perspective. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:95–100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02137.x
  7. Bartlett DW, Shah P. A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res 2006;85:306–312. DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500405
  8. Farooq I, Bugshan A. The role of salivary contents and modern technologies in the remineralization of dental enamel: a narrative review. F1000Res 2020;9:171. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22499.3
  9. Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984;156:435–438. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805394
  10. Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, et al. A new index of tooth wear. Reproducibility and application to a sample of 18- to 30-year-old university students. Caries Res 2009;43:119–125. DOI: 10.1159/000209344
  11. Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, et al. Case-control study of non-carious cervical lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:286–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00861.x
  12. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, et al. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:725–733. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  13. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, et al. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:117–123. DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-182x.2003.01223.x
  14. Teixeira DNR, Zeola LF, Machado AC, et al. Relationship between noncarious cervical lesions, cervical dentin hypersensitivity, gingival recession, and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional study. J Dent 2018;76:93–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.017
  15. Que K, Guo B, Jia Z, et al. A cross-sectional study: non-carious cervical lesions, cervical dentine hypersensitivity and related risk factors. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:24–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02342.x
  16. Jiang H, Du MQ, Huang W, et al. The prevalence of and risk factors for non-carious cervical lesions in adults in Hubei Province, China. Community Dent Health 2011;28:22–28. DOI: 10.1922/CDH_2492Tai07
  17. Bernhardt O, Gesch D, Schwahn C, et al. Epidemiological evaluation of the multifactorial aetiology of abfractions. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:17–25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01532.x
  18. Alvarez-Arenal A, Alvarez-Menendez L, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, et al. Non-carious cervical lesions and risk factors: a case-control study. J Oral Rehabil 2019;46:65–75. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12721
  19. Takehara J, Takano T, Akhter R, et al. Correlations of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal factors determined by using pressure-detecting sheet. J Dent 2008;36:774–779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.009
  20. Bergström J, Lavstedt S. An epidemiologic approach to toothbrushing and dental abrasion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7:57–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1979.tb01186.x
  21. Kumar S, Kumar A, Debnath N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for non-carious cervical lesions in children attending special needs schools in India. J Oral Sci 2015;57:37–43. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.57.37
  22. Rees JS. The biomechanics of abfraction. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006;220:69–80. DOI: 10.1243/095441105X69141
  23. Heasman PA, Holliday R, Bryant A, et al. Evidence for the occurrence of gingival recession and non-carious cervical lesions as a consequence of traumatic toothbrushing. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42(Suppl 16):S237–S255. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12330
  24. Antonelli JR, Hottel TL, Brandt R, et al. The role of occlusal loading in the pathogenesis of non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2013;26:86–92.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.