Salivary Leptin Levels in Varying Body Weight Patients during Orthodontic Treatment with Conventional and Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vivo Study
Kavuda Nagarjuna Prasad, Nivedita Sahoo, Piyush Gupta, Saranya Sreedhar, Aravind Krishnan, George Sam
Keywords :
Body mass index, Orthodontic treatment, Salivary leptin levels, Self-ligating brackets
Citation Information :
Prasad KN, Sahoo N, Gupta P, Sreedhar S, Krishnan A, Sam G. Salivary Leptin Levels in Varying Body Weight Patients during Orthodontic Treatment with Conventional and Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vivo Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (6):506-513.
Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare salivary leptin levels in normal-weight and overweight female participants bonded with conventional and self-ligating preadjusted brackets and compared before and after orthodontic force application. The results were then correlated with the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
Materials and methods: The present study involved 48 female subjects who were divided equally into three main groups: group I—conventional bracket, group II—self-ligating bracket, and group III—control. Each group was further subdivided based on their body mass index (BMI) into normal-weight and overweight groups. All subjects required distalization of the maxillary canine after maxillary first premolar extraction. Active lacebacks were incorporated to apply distal force to the maxillary canine. Salivary samples were collected from each subject at T0 (before force application), T1 (1 hour after force application), and T2 (1 month after force application). The salivary samples were analyzed for leptin levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. The rate of tooth movement was also measured at T2 on study models.
Results: The mean salivary leptin concentration in conventional bracket (591.4 ± 213.2) and self-ligating bracket (608.1 ± 217.7) groups showed a significant initial increase at T1, and then decreased at T2 (423.1 ± 208.2 and 407.1 ± 214.3, respectively), whereas in the control group, there were no changes. In the self-ligating bracket group, both normal-weight (0.85 ± 0.03) and overweight (0.77 ± 0.02) participants had a significantly higher mean rate of tooth movement than the conventional (0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.71 ± 0.02, respectively) bracket group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The overall salivary leptin concentration in the self-ligating bracket group at T2 was much lower than its baseline compared to other groups. There was a significant inverse relationship between salivary leptin concentration and tooth movement rate.
Clinical significance: Leptin has cytokine-like effects that are responsible for bone remodeling, and since orthodontic tooth movement involves the inflammatory process, leptin can affect the rate of orthodontic tooth movement, with a difference in orthodontic tooth movement between normal-weight and overweight persons.
Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129(4):469e.1–469e.32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.007
Alhashimi N, Frithiof L, Brudvik P, et al. Orthodontic tooth movement and de novo synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(3):307–312. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.110809
Jr Andrade I, Taddei SRA, Alencar de Souza PE. Inflammation and tooth movement: the role of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Semin Orthod 2012;18(4):257–269. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2012.06.004
Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, et al. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 1994;372(6505):425–432. DOI: 10.1038/372425a0
Paul RF, Hassan M, Nazar HS, et al. Effect of body mass index on serum leptin levels. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2011;23(3):40–43. PMID: 23272432.
Considine RV, Sinha MK, Heiman ML, et al. Serum immunoreactive-leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese humans. N Engl J Med 1996;334(5):292–295. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340503
Lago R, Gomez R, Lago F, et al. Leptin beyond body weight regulation: current concepts concerning its role in immune function and inflammation. Cell Immunol 2008;252(1–2):139–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.004
Steppan CM, Crawford DT, Chidsey-Frink KL, et al. Leptin is a potent stimulator of bone growth in ob/ob mice. Regul Pept 2000;92(1–3):73–78. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-0115(00)00152-x
Ducy P, Amling M, Takeda S, et al. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: a central control of bone mass. Cell 2000;100(2):197–120. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81558-5
Purwar P, Khan MA, Mahdi AA, et al. Salivary and serum leptin concentrations in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol 2015;86(4):588–594. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2014.140581
Srinivasan B, Chitharanjan A, Kailasam V, et al. Evaluation of leptin concentration in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during orthodontic tooth movement and its correlation to the rate of tooth movement. J Orthod Sci 2019;8:6. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_58_18
Groschl M, Rauh M, Wagner R, et al. Identification of leptin in human saliva. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86(11):5234–5239. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.7998
Randeva HS, Karteris E, Lewandowski KC, et al. Circadian rhythmicity of salivary leptin in healthy subjects. Mol Genet Metab 2003;78(3):229–235. DOI: 10.1016/s1096-7192(03)00004-0
Neeley WW 2nd, Gonzales DA. Obesity in adolescence: Implications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(5):581–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.028
Hamrick MW, Ferrari SL. Leptin and the sympathetic connection of fat to bone. Osteoporosis Int 2008;19(7):905–912. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0487-9
Agrawal S, Gollapudi SH, Su H, et al. Leptin activates human B cells to secrete TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 via JAK2/STAT3 and p38MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathway. J Clin Immunol 2011;31(3):472–478. DOI: 10.1007/s10875-010-9507-1
Myers MG, Cowley MA, Munzberg H. Mechanisms of leptin action and leptin resistance. Annu Rev Physiol 2008;70:537–556. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100707
Jayachandran T, Srinivasan B, Padmanabhan S. Salivary leptin levels in normal-weight and overweight individuals and their correlation with orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 2017;87(5):739–744. DOI: 10.2319/120216-869.1
Moresca R. Orthodontic treatment time: can it be shortened? Dental Press J Orthod 2018;23(6):90–105. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.090-105.sar
Harradine N. The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Semin Orthod 2008;14(1):5–18. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2007.12.002
Amanda J, Widayati R, Soedarsono N, et al. RANKL concentrations in early orthodontic treatment using passive self-ligating and preadjusted edgewise appliance bracket systems. J Phys Conf Ser 2018;1073(4):042002. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/4/042002
Widayati R, Adiwirya MSK, Soedarsono N. Osteoprotegerin level differences in orthodontic treatment with self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets at early aligning and leveling phase. World J Dent 2018;9(1):2–7. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1497
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bullet World Health Organization 2001;79(4):373–374. PMID: 11357217.
World Health Organization Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363(9403):157–163. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3
Sueri MY, Turk T. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction. Angle Orthod 2006;76(6):1010–1014. DOI: 10.2319/100605-351
Khambay BS, McHugh S, Millett DT. Magnitude and reproducibility of forces generated by clinicians during laceback placement. J Orthod 2006;33(4):270–275. DOI: 10.1179/146531205225021762
Thanakun S, Watanabe H, Thaweboon S, et al. An effective technique for the processing of saliva for the analysis of leptin and adiponectin. Peptides 2013;47:60–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.06.010
Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Br Med J 1940;2(4158):358–359.
Tuncer BB, Ozmeriç N, Tuncer C, et al. Levels of interleukin-8 during tooth movement. Angle Orthod 2005;75(4):631–636. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[631:LOIDTM]2.0.CO;2
Reid IR, Comish J. Direct actions of leptin on bone remodelling. Calcif Tissue Int 2004;74(4):313–316. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-0015-z
Turner RT, Kalra SP, Wong CP, et al. Peripheral leptin regulates bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 2013;28(1):22–34. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1734
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M, et al. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth. Angle Orthod 2009;79(3):533–539. DOI: 10.2319/050508-249.1
Higa RH, Semenara NT, Henriques JF, et al. Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets. Dent Press J Orthod 2016;21(6):91–97. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.091-097.oar
Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(4):416–422. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.14
Ehsani S, Mandich MA, El Bialy TH, et al. Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2009;79(3):592–601. DOI: 10.2319/060208-288.1
Lamghari M, Tavares L, Camboa N, et al. Leptin effect on RANKL and OPG expression in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem 2006;98(5):1123–1129. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20853
Guimaraes GS, de Morais LS, de Souza MM, et al. Superficial morphology and mechanical properties of in vivo aged orthodontic ligatures. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18(3):107–112. DOI: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000300017
Morberg CM, Tetens I, Black E, et al. Leptin and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in obese and nonobese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88(12):5795–5800. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030496
Leonard MB, Shults J, Wilson BA, et al. Obesity during childhood and adolescence augments bone mass and bone dimensions. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(2):514–523. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.514