Impact Strength of Thermopolymerized Poly(methylmethacrylate) Denture Resin Incorporated with Polyetheretherketone Microparticles at Various Concentrations: An In Vitro Research
Citation Information :
Anuradha V, Devaki V, Balu K, Viswanathan M, Vishnupriya SB. Impact Strength of Thermopolymerized Poly(methylmethacrylate) Denture Resin Incorporated with Polyetheretherketone Microparticles at Various Concentrations: An In Vitro Research. World J Dent 2023; 14 (12):1108-1111.
Aim: To evaluate the impact strength (IS) of poly(methylmethacrylate) [P(MMA)] denture resin incorporated with polyetherether ketone (PEEK) microparticles at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% concentrations.
Materials and methods: The study groups were divided into groups I, II, III, IV, and V reinforced based on the five PEEK incorporations. A total of 50 bar-shaped heat-cured resin samples (80 × 10 × 4 mm3) were prepared for the five groups based on the PEEK concentrations with 10 samples in each group. These samples were tested for their IS using Charpy's impact tester. The obtained data were recorded and statistically analyzed.
Results: A new hybrid polymer P(MMA-PEEK) has resulted. The IS of group V (5.44 J/mm2) was the highest followed by the group IV sample with 15% (4.94 J/mm2), group III (4.66 J/mm2), and group II PEEK (4.10 J/mm2). The IS of group I was the lowest (3.93 J/mm2). There were also significant differences (p < 0.001) among the studied groups.
Conclusion: The incorporation of PEEK microparticles with P(MMA) has increased the IS of the heat-polymerized acrylic resin. P(MMA-PEEK) with 20 wt% PEEK microparticles exhibited the highest IS when compared to neat P(MMA).
Clinical significance: Denture fractures occur due to an accidental fall or by inadvertent occlusal loads. The incorporation of PEEK microparticles in P(MMA) ensued in a new hybrid polymer P(MMA-PEEK) with improved IS. This polymer reduces the risk of denture fracture and prolongs the clinical serviceability of dentures in the senile geriatric population.
Asar NV, Albayrak H, Korkmaz T, et al. Influence of various metal oxides on mechanical and physical properties of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5(3):241–247. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.241
Narva KK, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The static strength and modulus of fiber reinforced denture base polymer. Dent Mater 2005;21(5):421–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.007
Spasojevic P, Zrilic M, Panic V, et al. The mechanical properties of a poly(methylmethacrylate) denture base material modified with dimethyl itaconate and di-n-butyl itaconate. Int J Polym Sci 2015;5:1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2015/561012
Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA. Monomer modifications of denture base acrylic resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11(Suppl 2):S112–S125. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_34_19
Tekin S, Cangil S, Adiguzel O, et al. Areas for use of PEEK material in dentistry. Int Dent Res 2018;8(2):84–92. DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.6
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60(1):12–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001
Skirbutis G, Dzingute A, Masiliunaite V, et al. A review of PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija 2017;19(1):19–23. PMID: 29243680.
Mahfooz AMB, Alammari MR. The use of fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis and cell viability assay to assess pre-polymerized CAD/CAM acrylic resin denture base materials. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 2018;7(2):111–118. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0424-y
Al-Ali AAS, Kassab-Bashi TY. Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy of new copolymers of acrylic resin denture base materials. Int J Enhanced Res Sci Tech Eng 2015;4(4):172–180.
Rodriguez LS, Paleari AG, Giro G, et al. Chemical characterization and flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin with monomer 2-tert-butylaminoethyl methacrylate. J Prosthodont 2013;22(4):292–297. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00942.x
Spasojevic P, Panic V, Seslija S, et al. Poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials modified with ditetrahydrofurfuryl itaconate: significant applicative properties. J Serb Chem Soc 2015;80(9):1177–1192. DOI: 10.2298/JSC150123034S
Wicaksono ST, Rasyida, Ardhyananta H. Synthesis and characterization of acrylic-based photopolymer as a candidate for denture base material. Mater Sci Eng 2017;202:1–10. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/202/1/012079
Yu SH, Lee Y, OH S, et al. Reinforcing effects of different fibers on denture base resin based on the fiber type, concentration, and combination. Dent Mater J 2012;31(6):1039–1046. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-020
Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, et al. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2012;100(4):1044–1052. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32669
Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, et al. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):217. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7
Brillhart M, Botsis J. Fatigue crack growth analysis in PEEK. Int J Fatigue 1994;16(2):134–140. DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90103-1
Muhsin SA, Hatton PV, Johnson A, et al. Determination of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) mechanical properties as a denture material. Saudi Dent J 2019;31(3):382–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.03.005
Sobieraj MC, Rimnac CM. PEEK Biomaterials Handbook, 1st edition. Waltham, Massachusetts: Elsevier; 2012. pp. 61–73.
Reinhart TJ, Clements LL. Engineered Materials Handbook. Ohio, United States: ASM International; 1993; pp. 27–34.
Merrett K, Cornelius RM, McClung WG, et al. Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2002;13(6):593–621. DOI: 10.1163/156856202320269111
Callister Jr WD. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 7th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2007. p. 532.
Begum SS, Ajay R, Devaki V, et al. Impact strength and dimensional accuracy of heat-cure denture base resin reinforced with Zro2 nanoparticles: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11(Suppl 2):365–370. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_36_19
Gad MM, Rahoma A, Al-Thobity AM, et al. Influence of incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the repair strength of polymethyl methacrylate denture bases. Int J Nanomedicine 2016;11:5633–5643. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S120054
Asopa V, Suresh S, Khandelwal M, et al. A comparative evaluation of properties of zirconia reinforced high impact acrylic resin with that of high impact acrylic resin. Saudi J Dent Res 2015;6(2):146–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.02.003
Ayad NM, Badawi MF, Fatah AA. Effect of reinforcement of high-impact acrylic resin with zirconia on some physical and mechanical properties. Rev Clin Pesq Odontol 2008;4:145–151. DOI: 10.7213/AOR.V4I3.23218
Paul L, Ravichandran R, Karunakaran HK, et al. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles incorporation on tensile and impact strength in two different acrylic denture base resins. Int Dent J Stud Res 2020;8(2):65–74. DOI: 10.18231/j
Ebrahim MI. A study of PMMA reinforced with titanium dioxide nanosized particles on transverse and impact strengths. Open Access J Biomed Sci 2022;4(6):2187–2192. DOI: 10.38125/OAJBS.00051
Ahmed MA, El-Shennawy M, Althomali YM, et al. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different types of acrylic resin denture base. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering 2016;6:111–119. DOI: 10.4236/wjnse.2016.63011
Ali Aljafery AM. Flexural resistance and impact resistance of high-impact acrylic resin with addition of TiO2-Al2O3 nanoparticles. Nano Biomed Eng 2018;10(1):40–45. DOI: 10.5101/nbe.v10i1.p40-45
Alhotan A, Yates J, Zidan S, et al. Assessing fracture toughness and impact strength of PMMA reinforced with nano-particles and fibre as advanced denture base materials. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(15):4127. DOI: 10.3390/ma14154127
John J, Gangadhar SA, Shah I. Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(4):424–427. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.118564