World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2023 ) > List of Articles

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE

Minimally Invasive Implant Surgery Using Soft Tissue Punch Technique: A Randomized Split-mouth Clinical Study

Dhwani K Dedhia, Vijayalakshmi Rajaram, Jaideep Mahendra, Burnice N Kumari, Pavithra H Dave, N Ambalavanan, Thodur M Balaji

Keywords : Crestal bone levels, Flapless implant surgery, Minimally invasive approach, Soft tissue punch technique

Citation Information : Dedhia DK, Rajaram V, Mahendra J, Kumari BN, Dave PH, Ambalavanan N, Balaji TM. Minimally Invasive Implant Surgery Using Soft Tissue Punch Technique: A Randomized Split-mouth Clinical Study. World J Dent 2023; 14 (11):1019-1025.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2329

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 16-01-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the crestal bone levels surrounding the implants on 0, 90th, and 180th day using the flapless soft tissue punch technique with and without repositioning of the punched soft tissue back at the osteotomy site after the surgery. Flapless implant surgery is a boon to dentistry, which comprises a marginally invasive procedure for the placement of the implant. In recent times, it has been widely used for flapless implant placement either by using a soft tissue punch or a direct drill method. Flapless implant surgery with soft tissue punch has been seen to minimize the crestal bone loss when compared to the direct drill method or conventional technique. Materials and methods: Seven subjects with bilateral posterior edentulous sites were selected for this study which were segregated into two groups. In group I, placement of implants was done using flapless soft tissue punch technique without repositioning of punched soft tissue back at osteotomy site, and in group II, seven implants were placed using flapless soft tissue punch technique with repositioning of punched soft tissue back at osteotomy site. For measuring the crestal bone height, digital radiographic images were obtained at 0, 90th, and 180th day and changes were evaluated using CorelDRAW software. Results: On intragroup comparison, there was a significant crestal bone loss seen in both groups I and II, from 0 to 180th days (p = 0.001). On intergroup comparison, no statistically significant difference in crestal bone height measurements was found between groups I and II from 0 to 180th days. Conclusion: Hence, it is concluded that the flapless soft tissue punch technique with repositioning produced faster healing, less scar formation, and minimal bleeding. However, in terms of crestal bone changes, it showed similar results to the flapless soft tissue punch technique without repositioning. Clinical significance: The soft tissue punch technique can be implemented as an appropriate protocol, showing clinician's ease, less time-consuming, and improved patient compliance owing to the faster healing and less scar formation with minimal crestal bone loss.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Cranin AN. Glossary of implant terms. J Oral Implantol 2007:0_1.
  2. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scad J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;16:1–132. PMID: 356184.
  3. Shahnaz A, Jamali R, Mohammadi F, et al. A preliminary randomized clinical trial comparing diode laser and scalpel periosteal incision during implant surgery: impact on postoperative morbidity and implant survival. Lasers Med Sci 2018;33(1):19–25. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2315-6
  4. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11–25. PMID: 3527955.
  5. Salama H, Salama MA, Garber D, et al. The interproximal height of bone: a guidepost to predictable aesthetic strategies and soft tissue contours in anterior tooth replacement. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10(9):1131–1141; quiz 1142. PMID: 10093558.
  6. Lin GH, Chan HL, Bashutski JD, et al. The effect of flapless surgery on implant survival and marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2014;85(5):e91–e103. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130481
  7. Auty C, Siddiqui A. Punch technique for preservation of interdental papillae at nonsubmerged implant placement. Implant Dent 1999;8(2):160–166. PMID: 10635158.
  8. Gomez-Roman G. Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):61–67. PMID: 11280363.
  9. Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Billy EJ, et al. Effect of flapless implant surgery on soft tissue profile: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006;77(5):874–882. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050169
  10. Jeong SM, Choi BH, Kim J, et al. A 1-year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111(1):41–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.037
  11. Bhavsar V, Bandish Jhala, Ramya P. Flapless implant surgery: a clinical evaluation. Br J Pharm Med Res 2019;4(3):1928–1940. DOI: 10.24942/bjpmr.2019.523
  12. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, et al. Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: follow-up results from a multicenter study. J Periodontol 2009;80(2):347–352. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080286
  13. Job S, Bhat V, Naidu EM. In vivo evaluation of crestal bone heights following implant placement with ’flapless’ and ’with-flap’ techniques in sites of immediately loaded implants. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19(4):320–325. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.44535
  14. Wadhwa B, Jain V, Bhutia O, et al. Flapless versus open flap techniques of implant placement: a 15-month follow-up study. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26(4):372–377. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.167629
  15. Kaur T, Kumar S, Jain S, et al. A radiographic evaluation of peri-implant bone level in immediate and conventionally loaded implants using flap and flapless techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(6):707–715. PMID: 31358714.
  16. Sunitha RV, Sapthagiri E. Flapless implant surgery: a 2-year follow-up study of 40 implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116(4):e237–e243. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.027
  17. Al-Juboori MJ, Ab Rahman S, Hassan A, et al. What is the effect of initial implant position on the crestal bone level in flap and flapless technique during healing period? J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43(4):153–159. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.4.153
  18. Brodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:118–125. PMID: 19885439.
  19. Romero-Ruiz MM, Mosquera-Perez R, Gutierrez-Perez JL, et al. Flapless implant surgery: a review of the literature and 3 case reports. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7(1):e146–e152. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51985
  20. Divakar TK, Gidean Arularasan S, Baskaran M, et al. Clinical evaluation of placement of implant by flapless technique over conventional flap technique. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2020;19(1):74–84. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01218-9
  21. Voulgarakis A, Strub JR, Att W. Outcomes of implants placed with three different flapless surgical procedures: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43(4):476–486. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.024
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.