World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Cellular Toxicity of Three Heat Polymerized Acrylic Resins: An In Vitro Study

Jerry J Chokkattu, Singamsetty Neeharika, Indira P Brahmajosyula, Lakshmi Thangavelu

Keywords : Absorbance spectrum, Acrylic resins, Cytotoxicity, HT1080 fibroblasts, Optical density

Citation Information : Chokkattu JJ, Neeharika S, Brahmajosyula IP, Thangavelu L. Comparative Evaluation of Cellular Toxicity of Three Heat Polymerized Acrylic Resins: An In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2023; 14 (6):492-497.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2256

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-08-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: This research aims to assess the cytotoxicity of Triplex Hot, Trevalon H, and dental products of India (DPI) heat cure acrylic resins by comparing their optical density at 1, 24, and 72 hours and evaluating the residual monomer's effect on fibroblast cells. Materials and methods: A total of 90 heat-cured acrylic resin specimens (30 each of Trevalon H, Triplex Hot, and DPI) were divided into three groups. HT-1080 fibroblasts were cultured, and resin samples were introduced into respective wells. The inflammatory response was assessed after 1, 24, and 72 hours of incubation. Cell vitality was measured using an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)—2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's test. Results: All three groups have displayed cytotoxicity at varied levels after 1 hour, 24 hours, and 72 hours, but with no significant difference among groups after 24 hours, increasing safety concerns towards their usage. H3 samples showed a higher level of cytotoxicity in general when compared with H1 and H2. Conclusion: It has been concluded that levels of cytotoxicity were found to be higher and lower after 1 hour and 72 hours incubation period respectively, whereas all the resins displayed similar levels of cytotoxicity after 24 hours explaining that the residual monomers will percolate maximum within the first 24 hours after processing of dentures. Clinical significance: It was discovered that resin had varying degrees of cytotoxic effects, raising concerns about the safe clinical application of these materials. Hence proper care should be taken during the selection of resin materials to prevent adverse effects on operators and patients.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Kostic M, Najman S, Najdanovic J, et al. Application of direct contact test in evaluation of cytotoxicity of acrylic denture base resins. Acta Medica Medianae 2012;51(1):66–72. DOI: 10.5633/amm.2012.0112
  2. Zafar MS. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): an update. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12(10):2299. DOI: 10.3390/polym12102299
  3. Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, et al. Biocompatibility of denture base acrylic resins evaluated in culture of L929 cells. Effect of polymerisation cycle and post-polymerisation treatments. Gerodontology 2007;24(1):52–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00146.x
  4. Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Van Noort. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials. Materials 2009;2(2):514–548. DOI: 10.3390/ma2020514
  5. Lopes MS, Azevedo A, Teixeira A, et al. Cytotoxicity of acrylic based resin compound in a human gingival fibroblast cell line. Rev Port Estamatol Med Dent Cir Maxillofac 2013;54:87–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpemd.2013.02.003
  6. Ebrahimi Saravi, Vojdani M, Bahrani F. Evaluation of cellular toxicity of three denture base acrylic resins. J Dent (Tehran) 2012;9(4): 180–188.
  7. Freshney RI. Cytotoxicity. In: culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique. 5th ed, John Wiley & Son's publications, Inc, 2005;359–374.
  8. Nishimiya H, Yamada M, Ueda T, et al. N-acetyl cysteine alleviates inflammatory reaction of oral epithelial cells to poly (methyl methacrylate) extract. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73(8):616–625. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1021834
  9. Ivkovic N, Bozovic D, Ristic S, et al. The residual monomer in dental acrylic resin and its adverse effects. Contemporary Materials 2013;4(1):84–91. DOI: 10.7251/COMEN1301084I
  10. Gautam R, Singh RD, Sharma VP, et al. Biocompatibility of polymethylmethacrylate resins used in dentistry. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012;100(5):1444–1450. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32673
  11. ISO20795-1:2013, Dentistry – Base polymers - Part 1:. Denture base polymers.
  12. Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, et al. Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(2): 190–193. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00349-4
  13. Koutis D, Freeman S. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture. Australas J Dermatol 2001;42(3):203–206. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00517.x
  14. Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, et al. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):217. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7
  15. Ajay R, Suma K, SreeVarun M, et al. Evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity of heat-cure denture base resin processed with a dual-reactive cycloaliphatic monomer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1279–1285.
  16. Ajay R, Suma K, Arulkumar S, et al. Histocompatibility of novel cycloaliphatic comonomer in heat-cured denture base acrylic resin: histomorphometric analysis in rats. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2020;12(Suppl 1):S453–S461. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_139_20
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.