World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE S1 ( Supplementary Issue 1, 2022 ) > List of Articles

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE

Devise of an Innovative, UV-enabled, and Self-sanitizing Prosthesis Trimming Unit: A Clinical Technique

Anil Kumar Gujjari, Sankeerth Gujjari, Priya Mukherjee, Sheela Kumar Gujjari, Meenakshi Iyer, S Sowmya, KN RaghavendraSwamy

Keywords : Debris, Handpiece, Inhalation, Prosthesis, Sanitization, Trimming, Ultraviolet

Citation Information : Gujjari AK, Gujjari S, Mukherjee P, Gujjari SK, Iyer M, Sowmya S, RaghavendraSwamy K. Devise of an Innovative, UV-enabled, and Self-sanitizing Prosthesis Trimming Unit: A Clinical Technique. World J Dent 2022; 13 (S1):S113-S117.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2117

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to devise an innovative, ultraviolet (UV) enabled, self-sanitizing prosthesis trimming unit for dental prostheses in order to safeguard the dental operators and technicians from fine material pollutants and prevent nosocomial infection due to cross-contamination. Background: As the prosthesis remains soaked in the saliva, it tends to harbor microbes forming a safe haven for them. The process of trimming, for subsequent adjustments and corrections, makes these contaminated particles from the denture become airborne. The inhalation of the same infects the dental personnel. Therefore, trimming and smoothening of contaminated prostheses is considered a biological hazard, and it requires innovation and development to minimize the same. Technique: A closed unit of 12 × 15 inches Plexi fiber fitted with a straight handpiece and UV light was made for trimming of the prosthesis and later sanitization of the unit. A large transparent lid was hinged to the box from the top. A light-emitting diode (LED) light was used to enhance visibility during trimming. The box was fitted with gloves for the operator to insert their hands to trim the prosthesis with the handpiece inside. An inlet window of 2 × 4 inches covered with a split rubber dam sheet facilitated the placement of the prosthesis inside the unit for trimming. Sanitization of the unit was achieved by switching on an UV light of wavelength 222 nm placed inside the unit for 30 minutes. Conclusion: The unit has been designed to be effective in negating the danger of inhalation of contaminants released during denture trimming. The design helps in preventing aerosol contamination to the staff and cross-contamination to subsequent patients and the environment. Clinical significance: The unit has been developed to decrease aerosol contamination and safeguard the operatory from infections, especially considering the current COVID-19 scenario. The equipment can be effectively used in dental clinics and laboratories. It may be modified to accommodate dental lathes. Microbiological analysis of the unit to evaluate its quantitative efficacy can be further incorporated.


PDF Share
  1. Koksal T, Dikbas I. Color stability of different denture teeth materials against various staining agents. Dent Mater J 2008;27(1):139–144. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.27.139
  2. Naji SA. Determination of residual monomer in heat cured of acrylic resin denture base material after strengthening it with titanium nanotubes. J Glob Pharma Technol 2019;11(07S):648–655.
  3. Singh G, Agarwal A, Lahori M. Effect of cigarette smoke on the surface roughness of two different denture base materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;19(1):42–48. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_82_18
  4. Imirzalioglu P, Karacaer O, Yilmaz B, et al. Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee, and nicotine. J Prosthodont 2010;19(2):118–124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00535.x
  5. Lin JJ, Cameron SM, Runyan DA, et al. Disinfection of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):202–206. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70249-0
  6. Verran J, Kossar S, McCord JF. Microbiological study of selected risk areas in dental technology laboratories. J Dent 1996;24(1-2):77–80. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00052-6
  7. Harrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(4):429–437. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0207
  8. MacIntyre CR, Heslop DJ. Public health, health systems and palliation planning for COVID-19 on an exponential timeline. Med J Aust 2020;212(10):440–442. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50592
  9. Ananthanarayan R. Ananthanarayan and Paniker's textbook of microbiology. Orient Blackswan 2006.
  10. D'Orazio J, Jarrett S, Amaro-Ortiz A, et al. UV radiation and the skin. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14(6):12222–12248. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140612222
  11. Kritivasan S, Zareen N, Muralidharan NP, et al. Assessing the extent of aerosol spread in prosthetic dental lab. Int J Sci Res 2019;8(11).
  12. Nair VV, Karibasappa GN, Dodamani A, et al. Microbial contamination of removable dental prosthesis at different interval of usage: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soci 2016;16(4):346–351. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.176536
  13. Sharma A, Chaudhari B, Shrestha B, et al. Salivary microflora of complete denture wearing patients. Int J Dent Sci 2018;6(3):74–77. DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-6-3-4
  14. Gujjari SK, Gujjari AK, Patel PV, et al. Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2011;1(1):20–26. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.86383
  15. Alici NŞ, Beyan AC, Demıral Y, et al. Dental technicians’ pneumoconiosis; illness behind a healthy smile–case series of a reference center in Turkey. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2018;22(1):35–39. DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_41_18
  16. Tan HL, Faisal M, Soo CI, et al. Dental technician pneumoconiosis mimicking pulmonary tuberculosis: a case report. BMC Pulm Med 2016;16(1):131. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0293-2
  17. Debattista N, Zarb MJ, Portelli JM. Bacterial atmospheric contamination during routine dental activity. 2007;20(4).
  18. Williams DW, Chamary N, Lewis MA, et al. Microbial contamination of removable prosthodontic appliances from laboratories and impact of clinical storage. Br Dent J 2011;211(4):163–166. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.675
  19. McDevitt JJ, Rudnick SN, Radonovich LJ. Aerosol susceptibility of influenza virus to UV-C light. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78(6):1666–1669. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06960-11
  20. Welch D, Buonanno M, Grilj V, et al. Far-UVC light: a new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21058-w
  21. Ramakrishnan H, Raghupathi M. Covid 19 gadgets and equipments for a dental clinic-an overview and update. On J Dent Oral Health 2020;4(1). DOI: OJDOH.MS.ID.000576
  22. Raghunath N, Meenakshi S, Sreeshyla HS, et al. Aerosols in dental practice-a neglected infectious vector. Micro Res J Int 2016;14(2):1–8. DOI: 10.9734/BMRJ/2016/24101
  23. Abichandani SJ, Nadiger R. Cross-contamination in dentistry: a comprehensive overview. Chron Young Sci 2013;4(1). DOI: 10.4103/2229-5186.108807
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.