World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Bond Strength of Luted Fiberglass Posts with Different Cementation Protocols: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Daniel Alvítez-Temoche, Román Mendoza, Iván Calderón, Doris Salcedo-Moncada, Romel Watanabe, Frank Mayta-Tovalino

Keywords : Bond strength, Cementation, Fiber post, In vitro study

Citation Information : Alvítez-Temoche D, Mendoza R, Calderón I, Salcedo-Moncada D, Watanabe R, Mayta-Tovalino F. Comparison of Bond Strength of Luted Fiberglass Posts with Different Cementation Protocols: A Comparative In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2022; 13 (1):40-45.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1886

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-12-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: To compare the bond strength of fiberglass posts luted with different adhesive luting protocols. Materials and methods: Thirty bovine teeth that underwent endodontic treatment were used. The crowns were removed, and the root canals were prepared. In the first group, the posts were cemented with an etch-and-rinse protocol with universal adhesive and resin cement; for the second group, a self-etching protocol with universal adhesive and resin cement was adopted; for the third group, a protocol with self-adhesive cement was adopted. The roots of the teeth were sectioned into 2-mm thick specimens, corresponding to the middle, cervical, and apical thirds of the space prepared for the post. The specimens were pushed out using a universal testing machine. The normality of the data was tested by the Shapiro–Wilk test, and statistical analyses included ANOVA and Bonferroni test. Results: The mean adhesion force was 21.2 ± 4.7 MPa in the first group, 22.6 ± 5.1 MPa in the second, and 12.3 ± 2.1 MPa in the third group. At the cervical level, the mean adhesion force was 17.5 ± 5.2 MPa, at the level of the middle third, it was 17.7 MPa ± 5.4, and at the apical level, 21.0 ± 7.3 MPa. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the mean adhesion\'s forces between groups 1 and 2, while the values of group 3 were significantly lower than those of the other groups. Clinical significance: This research allows us to know the impact of bonding systems on the different cementation protocols for fiberglass posts.

PDF Share
  1. Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015;41(3):309–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006
  2. Robles G, Huertas-Mogollón G, Mendoza-Martiarena Y, et al. Comparison of the resistance of bond strength of cemented fiberglass posts in different root thirds with and without silanization: an ex vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;21(3):261–266. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024–2774
  3. Archana CH, Krishna Raju SM, Yadhav SS, et al. Effect of surface pretreatment and thermal activation of silane coupling agent on bond strength of fiber posts to resin cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1293–1296. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024–2687
  4. Eid R, Azzam K, Skienhe H, et al. Influence of adaptation and adhesion on the retention of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing glass fiber posts to root canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(9):1003–1008. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024–2654
  5. Ubaldini ALM, Benetti AR, Sato F, et al. Challenges in luting fibre posts: adhesion to the post and to the dentine. Dent Mater 2018;34(7):1054–1062. DOI: 10.1016/
  6. Sarkis-Onofre R, Fergusson D, Cenci MS, et al. Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. J Endod 2017;43(2):175–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.025
  7. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Dietrich T, et al. Dentin-like versus rigid endodontic post: 11-year randomized controlled pilot trial on no-wall to 2-wall defects. J Endod 2017;43(11):1770–1775. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.030
  8. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Lenz J, et al. Teeth restored using fiber-reinforced posts: in vitro fracture tests and finite element analysis. Acta Biomater 2010;6(9):3747–3754. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.012
  9. Limeira FIR, Carvalho MFF, Nascimento VVD, et al. Bond strength of resin cements fixing fiber posts to human and bovine teeth of different ages. J Adhes Dent 2019;21(5):423–431. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43180
  10. Liu C, Liu H, Qian YT, et al. The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post. Int J Oral Sci 2014;6(1):56–60. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2013.83
  11. Lorenzetti CC, Bortolatto JF, Ramos ATPR, et al. The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth. Microsc Res Tech 2019;82(7):1191–1197. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23268
  12. Amiri EM, Balouch F, Atri F. Effect of self-adhesive and separate etch adhesive dual cure resin cements on the bond strength of fiber post to dentin at different parts of theroot. J Dent (Tehran) 2017;14(3):153–158. PMC5694848.
  13. Graiff L, Rasera L, Calabrese M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts: pull-out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods. Int J Dent 2014:148571. DOI: 10.1155/2014/148571
  14. Farid F, Rostami K, Habibzadeh S, et al. Effect of cement type and thickness on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018;12(4):277–282. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2018.043
  15. Rodrigues RV, Sampaio CS, Pacheco RR, et al. Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118(4):493–499. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.006
  16. Almulhim KS, Oliveira-Haas L, Farhangpour A. Effect of resin cement, aging process, and root level on the bond strength of fiber-posts: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2016;29(5):255–260. PMID: 29178737.
  17. Zamanian AH, Hakimaneh SMR, Mojahedi SM, et al. Efficiency of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser in debonding cemented glass fiber posts: an in vitro study. J Dent (Shiraz) 2021;22(1):1–7. DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.83933.1062
  18. Kırmalı Ö, Üstün Ö, Kapdan A, et al. Evaluation of various pretreatments to fiber post on the push-out bond strength of root canal dentin. J Endod 2017;43(7):1180–1185. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.006
  19. Šimundić Munitić M, Bago I, Glockner K, et al. Effect of different laser treatments on the bond strength of intracanal fiber posts cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement. J Prosthodont 2019;28(1):e290-e296. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12738
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.