World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Qualitative Research and its Role in Public Health Dentistry

Kothuri N Ravalika, Gururaghavendran Rajesh, Ashwini Rao, BH Mithun Pai

Keywords : Evidence-based dentistry, Mixed methods, Qualitative research, Research designs

Citation Information : Ravalika KN, Rajesh G, Rao A, Pai BM. Qualitative Research and its Role in Public Health Dentistry. World J Dent 2019; 10 (3):246-250.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1630

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this review was to comprehensively explore various aspects of qualitative research, its methods, applications, challenges, and recommendations pertaining to dentistry. Background: Qualitative research is a form of social inquiry concerned primarily with how people see and understand their social world. It has hypothesized the field of social sciences and proved to be helpful in health sciences as well. It has a descent from anthropology and philosophy to sociology. Evidence shows that this method was first used by anthropologists and sociologists back in the early decades of 20th century, as a method of inquiry. The qualitative research cycle consists of three interlinked methods: the design cycle, ethnographic cycle, and analytical cycle. In-depth interviews, focus group discussions, observation, and documentary analysis are methods to collect data. Most commonly practiced methods are the first two approaches. An approach of investigation involving both quantitative and qualitative data analysis is called as mixed methods research. Review results: Literature search was done with the help of Endnote software, followed by systematically arranging the retrieved articles in a synchronized manner. Few studies were found in the field of public health dentistry, which employed a qualitative approach to probe into a few sensitive issues. Conclusion: Although the future scope of qualitative research in this field is immense, it continues to be underutilized. Qualitative research complements quantitative research work as it explores complex phenomena and areas in which quantitative research alone may not be amenable to.


PDF Share
  1. Bogdan R, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1997.
  2. Van Maanen J. Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: a preface. Adm Sci Q 1979 Dec 1;24(4):520–526. DOI: 10.2307/2392358.
  3. Atkins S, Lewin S, et al. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 Apr;8(1):21–31. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.
  4. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2003.
  5. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research in Health Care. London: Blackwell BMJ Books; 2006.
  6. McMillan WJ. Finding a method to analyze qualitative data: using a study of conceptual learning. J Dent Educ 2009 Jan;73(1):53–64.
  7. Neutens J, Rubinson L. Qualitative research. Res Tech Health Sci 2002;3:163–192.
  8. Hoepfl M. Choosing qualitative research: a primer for technology education researchers. J Technol Educ 1997;9:1–16. DOI: 10.21061/jte.v9i1.a.4.
  9. Medeiros M. Thinking about qualitative research. Rev Eletr Enf 2012 Jun;14(2):224–225.
  10. Dunbar G. Evaluating research methods in psychology: a case study approach. USA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
  11. Al-Busaidi ZQ. Qualitative research and its uses in health care. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2008 Mar;8(1):11–19.
  12. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 Jul;8(1):45–55. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
  13. Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ 1998 Apr;316(7139):1230–1240. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230.
  14. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995 Jul;311(6996):42. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42.
  15. Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, et al. Handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage; 2010.
  16. Lichtman M. Qualitative research for the social sciences. London: Sage Publications; 2013.
  17. Prasad P. Crafting qualitative research: working in the post positivist traditions. New York: ME Sharpe; 2005.
  18. Hall A. Qualitative research and its role in nursing knowledge. Nurs Times 2006;102(20):32–35.
  19. Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage; 2009.
  20. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R, et al. Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
  21. Ehigie BO, Ehigie RI. Applying qualitative methods in organizations: a note for industrial/organizational psychologists. Qual Rep 2005;10(3):621–638.
  22. Guest G. Public health research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2014.
  23. Belk RW. Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2007.
  24. Edwards R, Holland J. What is qualitative interviewing?. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2013.
  25. Ritchie J, Lewis J, et al. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013.
  26. Tesch R. Qualitative research: analysis types and software. Routledge; 2013.
  27. Kinalski DD, Paula CC, et al. Focus group on qualitative research: experience report. Rev Bras Enferm 2017 Apr;70(2):424–429. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0091.
  28. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage; 2011.
  29. Banister P, Burman E, et al. Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994.
  30. Hennink M, Hutter I, et al. Qualitative research methods. London: Sage; 2011.
  31. George RP, Kruger E, et al. Qualitative research and dental public health. Indian J Dent Res 2012 Jan;23(1):92–96. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.99047.
  32. Krueger RA. Focus Group Kit. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
  33. Gill P, Stewart K, et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 2008 Mar;204(6): 291–295. DOI: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
  34. Kawulich BB. Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qual Soc Res 2005 May;6(2):43.
  35. Babbie ER. The basics of social research, 6th ed. USA: Cengage Learning; 2014.
  36. Hennink M, Hutter I, et al. Qualitative research methods. London: Sage; 2011.
  37. Ayres C. (n.d.). Advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research. [Blog] Vittana.org. Available at: https://vittana.org/23-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-qualitative-research, accessed 28 Jan. 2019.
  38. Surbhi S. Difference between qualitative and quantitative research. 2016, [Blog] keydifferences.com. Available at: https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-qualitative-and-quantitative-research.html, Accessed 28 Jan. 2019.
  39. Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. London: Sage publications; 2014.
  40. Cameron R. Mixed Methods Research: The Five Ps Framework. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2011 Sep;9(2):96–108.
  41. Faltermaier T. Why public health research needs qualitative approaches: subjects and methods in change. Eur J Public Health 1997 Dec;7(4):357–363. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/7.4.357.
  42. Santha B, Sudheer H, et al. Qualitative research in dental public health care: An overview. Pharma Innov J 2015;4(2):83–86. DOI: 10.7897/2277-4572.04220.
  43. Pearlin LJ. Structure and meaning in medical sociology. J Health Soc Behav 1992;33:1–9. DOI: 10.2307/2136853.
  44. Bower E, Scambler S. The contributions of qualitative research towards dental public health practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007 Jun;35(3):161–169. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00368.x.
  45. Abrahamsson KH, Berggren U, et al. Dental phobic patients’ view of dental anxiety and experiences in dental care: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 2002 Jun;16(2):188–196. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00083.x.
  46. Gallagher J, Clarke W, et al. Understanding the motivation: a qualitative study of dental students’ choice of professional career. Eur J Dent Educ 2008 May;12(2):89–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00506.x.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.