EDITORIAL


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1920
World Journal of Dentistry
Volume 13 | Issue 3 | Year 2022

An Update on the Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of New Generation Ni-Ti Rotary Instruments


Maurilio D’Angelo1, Andrea Cicconetti2, Shilpa Bhandi3, Federico Valenti Obino4, Edit Khajanka5, Alberto De Biase6

1,2,4,6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

3Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

5Department of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Tirana, Rruga e Dibrës, Tirana, Albania

Corresponding Author: Maurilio D’Angelo, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, Phone: +393473261393, e-mail: maurilio.dangelo@gmail.com

How to cite this article: D’Angelo M, Cicconetti A, Bhandi S, et al. An Update on the Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of New Generation Ni-Ti Rotary Instruments. World J Dent 2022;13(3):181-181.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

In recent years, various heat treatments have been introduced for Ni-Ti alloys by manufacturers, to improve the mechanical characteristics of resistance to torsional and flexural stresses, which have led to a high level of resistance of current rotary Ni-Ti instruments.1,2 This state makes increasingly difficult for the clinician to navigate the vast panorama of available Ni-Ti rotary files, and in this regard, the static tests used up to now to conduct this type of evaluation are no longer sufficient to discriminate in this difficult choice.3-5 After careful 3D planning, made extremely easy by modern CBCTs, even with a low dose of radiation, it is possible to tackle even the most complex anatomies with instruments that are increasingly resistant to a great multitude of stresses, and which allow to obtain extremely linear root canal preparations that can be easily filled in three dimensions.6,7 As an evaluation of the summation of the stresses to which these instruments are subjected, so that it can also be performed dynamically, the Operative Torque and the Polar Moment of Inertia have recently been proposed.4,8The Operative Torque allows to dynamically evaluate the torsional stresses that the instrument accumulates in relation to the torque it generates in its intracanal rotation.9 The Polar Moment of Inertia allows to study the resistance to torsional stress as a function of the tendency that a body rotating on its axis opposes this movement.8 This feature allows a more precise comparative evaluation of the instruments than the previous methods used to compare the resistance to torsional stresses.3,8 It is also necessary to remember that in recent years other physical characteristics of the instruments have also been analyzed, including the influence of shaft length, that should be considered as an instrument related factor, on torsional resistance of a nickel-titanium rotary instrument and could be stated that the longer the instrument, the higher the torsional resistance is.10,11 The study of cyclic fatigue, and in general of the physical characteristics of rotating instruments, needs, to date, to be conducted exclusively with dynamic tests, which better represent the real dynamics of rotating instruments in their clinical use.5,12 It is therefore necessary, to date, the introduction of standardized dynamic tests to compare the multitude of instruments offered on the market, which allow the clinician to choose the most suitable instrument for the specific clinical case due to its mechanical characteristics.8

REFERENCES

1. Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Reda R, et al. Role of the crystallographic phase of Ni-Ti Rotary instruments in determining their torsional resistance during different bending conditions. Materials 2021;14(21):6324. DOI: 10.3390/ma14216324

2. Bhandi S, Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, et al. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: an in vitro comparison (torsional resistance of two heat-treated reciprocating files). J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22(4):361–364. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3081

3. Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Relucenti M, et al. In vitro evaluation of a recently developed rotary file: AF Rotary Braz Dent Sci 2021;24(4). DOI: 10.14295/bds.2021.v24i4.2558

4. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, D’angelo M, et al. The relevance of operative torque and torsional resistance of nickel–titanium rotary instruments: A preliminary clinical investigation. Saudi Endod J 2020;10:260–264. DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_157_19

5. Seracchiani M, Miccoli G, Reda R, et al. A comprehensive in vitro comparison of mechanical properties of two rotary endodontic instruments. World J Dent 2020;11(3):185–188. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1729

6. Alhammadi MS, Al-Mashraqi AA, Alnami RH, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of facial measurements of digital photographs and wrapped cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) photographs. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(5):757. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050757

7. Bhandi S, Mashyakhy M, Abumelha AS, et al. Complete obturation-cold lateral condensation vs. thermoplastic techniques: a systematic review of micro-CT studies. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(14):4013. DOI: 10.3390/ma14144013

8. Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, et al. A paradigm shift for torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a finite element analysis. J Endod 2021;47(7):1149–1156. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.017

9. Di Nardo D, Zanza A, Seracchiani M, et al. Angle of insertion and torsional resistance of nickel–titanium rotary instruments. Materials 2021;14(13):3744. DOI: 10.3390/ma14133744

10. Gambarini G, Seracchiani M, Zanza A, et al. Influence of shaft length on torsional behavior of endodontic nickel–titanium instruments. Odontology 2021;109(3):568–573. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00572-2

11. Ferreira F, Adeodato C, Barbosa I, et al. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of Ni-Ti rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2017;50(2):143–152. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12613

12. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc blue, reciproc, and WaveOne gold reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2017;43(8):1360–1363. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.036

________________________
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.