CASE REPORT


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1907
World Journal of Dentistry
Volume 13 | Issue 2 | Year 2022

Management of Facial Subcutaneous Emphysema during Third Molar Surgery: A Case Report


Giulia Petroni1, Fabrizio Zaccheo2, Alfredo Passaretti3, Shilpa H Bhandi4, Dario Di Nardo5, Luca Testarelli6, Andrea Cicconetti7

1,2,5-7Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta, Rome, Italy

3Private dental practitioner, Rome, Italy

4Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

Corresponding Author: Andrea Cicconetti, Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta, Rome, Italy, Phone: +39 333 9010579, e-mail: andrea.cicconetti@uniroma1.it

ABSTRACT

Aim and objective: Aim of this case report is to illustrate a rare subcutaneous emphysema during third molar extraction.

Background: Third molar extraction is a common procedure in oral surgery. Common complications that may occur after the surgical procedure include bleeding, pain, swelling, and trismus. Subcutaneous emphysema in an unusual complication during dental extraction and it could lead to life-threatening situations.

Case description: In this report, a 26-year-old female patient experienced a facial subcutaneous emphysema, occurred in a few seconds during the surgical extraction of an impacted lower left third molar performed by the use of a high-speed turbine. The patient showed a normal mouth opening but an impossibility to fully open the left eye; there was no pain or breathing difficulties. A manual reduction of the emphysematous zone was performed. Amoxicillin 875 mg with clavulanic acid 125 mg in tablets every 12 h for 6 days was prescribed; 4 mg of intramuscular betamethasone (Bentelan, Defiante Farm Unipessoal LDA, Funchal, Portugal) were injected locally at the intervention site, and 80 mg of ketoprofen every 8 hours in case of pain, were administered after surgery; the patient was observed for 4 hours then allowed to leave the hospital. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 days after surgery. The healing was obtained in 6 days.

Conclusion: The prevention of subcutaneous emphysema requires minimal invasive surgery avoiding the use of high-speed air-turbine and flaps should be minimal elevated and properly retracted by an expert operator. Even if subcutaneous emphysema is self-limiting and usually heals in 7- 10 days, its prevention and early and accurate diagnosis are essential to avoid complications or life-threatening conditions.

Clinical significance: The procedures described in this case report may be of clinical significance in the knowledge, prevention, and treatment of subcutaneous emphysema, a potentially life-threatening condition.

How to cite this article: Petroni G, Zaccheo F, Passaretti A, et al. Management of Facial Subcutaneous Emphysema during Third Molar Surgery: A Case Report. World J Dent 2022;13(2):172-175.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

Keywords: Oral subcutaneous emphysema, Oral surgery complications, Third molar extraction

BACKGROUND

The surgical extraction of third molars is a frequent procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Tooth extraction is indicated in patients with problems caused by impacted teeth. Alveolar osteitis, bleeding, pain, swelling, and trismus are common postoperative complications associated with this surgical operation. Subcutaneous emphysema is considered an unusual but serious complication.1,2 Emphysema occurs when air is forced into the fascial space beneath the tissues. Clinically, we can observe tumor and crepitus on palpation. The volume of air under the tissue and the involved way determines the severity of clinical situation. Subcutaneous emphysema has been also reported after root canal treatments and surgical endodontic procedures and after traumatic injuries. In some cases, emphysema can be exacerbated or favored by the patient’s behavior such as wrong cleaning attitudes after surgical procedures or abuse of drugs inhalation.3,4,5 This condition is usually limited to the head and neck but migration to other tissue planes is possible: in some cases, the air could migrate deeper in the tissues through the pterygomandibular, submasseteric, infratemporal, orbital, parapharyngeal, and retropharyngeal spaces. Through the deeper spaces, air could also migrate to the mediastinum.6 Heyman and Babayof reported an incidence of 71% of emphysema after dental procedures and the most common causes were correlated to the use of the air syringe, high-speed turbines, or a combination of the two.7 Timely diagnosis, close observations of the symptoms, early initiation of pharmacologic therapy, and straight follow-up are recommended. This case report presents a case of facial subcutaneous emphysema during mandibular left third molar surgery, and its postsurgical management.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 26-year-old female patient presented in February, 2020 to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences of University “Sapienza” of Rome with pain and swelling in the left mandibular third molar area. Intraoral clinical examination assessed the presence of gingival inflammation and suppuration around the lower left third molar associated with pain and dysphagia. Orthopanoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed due to obtain proper informations on the exact relationships with the inferior alveolar nerve and the adjacent tissues. The element was partially impacted in the mandible, in horizontal position, with two separated, but not divergent roots, contiguous to inferior alveolar nerve (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Panoramic radiograph shows the mandibular left third molar position

The treatment plan provided the surgical extraction of the included left third molar with the elevation of a full-thickness flap and odontotomy. The previsioned risks for the surgical procedure were the temporary paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve and lesions to the lingual nerve.

Routine preoperative laboratory tests (full blood count, blood clotting tests, glycemia, azotemia, and creatinine) and cardiologic visit with electrocardiogram were performed. The patient was informed on the risks and benefits of the surgical intervention. The informed consent was obtained, and the extraction was scheduled. After local anesthesia, a full-thickness flap with a release incision positioned mesially to the second molar was performed by using a bard parker #15 scalped blade. The flap was elevated and maintained by the use of a Langenbeck retractor.8,9 The complete crown exposition was performed through ostectomy with a Lindemann stainless steel bur on a low-speed contra-angle handpiece with sterile saline irrigation. Tooth section was performed by using a conventional high-speed air turbine with rosette cutter (length 28 mm and diameter 2.1 mm) and it was obtained partially. During this surgical phase, swelling was observed from the lower margin of the jaw, up to the orbital area, with the partial closure of the eye, in the left hemiface of the patient (Fig. 2A). The procedure with high-speed turbine was suspended. The retractor was held by the assistant in a wrong position and the air followed the way created by the partially disinserted fibers of the masseter muscle. The subcutaneous emphysema was located in the left infraorbital area, cheek, and mandibular angle.

Figs 2A and B: (A) Intraoperative tissue swelling from the lower margin of the jaw, up to the orbital area; (B) partial closure of the left eye

The patient experienced no pain or breathing difficulties, but there was an impossibility to fully open the eye (Fig. 2B); there were no lesions on the eye sclera; palpation reveals the presence of crackling, without pain and the patient showed a normal mouth opening. A manual reduction of the emphysematous zone was performed. The coronal odontotomy was completed by using a red ring contra-angle handpiece 1:5 with rosette cutter (length 28 mm and diameter 2.1 mm) (Fig. 3); the mesial portion of the crown was removed; by using the same handpiece the coronal-radicular odontotomy was completed and the remaining portions of the dental element were removed; rinses of saline solution, revision of the alveolar cavity, and suture with vicryl 3.0 were performed.

Fig. 3: Removed tooth with separated fragments

Amoxicillin 875 mg with clavulanic acid 125 mg in tablets every 12 h for 6 days was prescribed; 4 mg of intramuscular betamethasone (Bentelan, Defiante Farm Unipessoal LDA, Funchal, Portugal) was injected locally at the intervention site, and 80 mg of ketoprofen every 8 hours in case of pain was administered after surgery; the patient was observed for 4 hours then allowed to leave the hospital. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 days after surgery.

The following day, the patient showed a partial reduction of the swelling, with a marked decrease in the crackle on palpation, and a partial reopening of the eyelid rim (Fig. 4A).

Figs. 4A to C: Extraoral condition of the patient after (A) 1 day; (B) 3 days; (C) 6 days; from the surgery

After 3 days, it was appreciable a further reduction of the swelling, absence of crackle on palpation, and total reopening of the eyelid rim (Fig. 4B).

After 6 days, the patient showed a total resolution of emphysema; slight postoperative edema persisted (Fig. 4C). The post-extractive alveolus was healed, and the suture removal was performed: no local or systemic complications were still present.

DISCUSSION

The present case report described a case of facial subcutaneous emphysema occurring after lower third molar surgery. Surgical removal of third molar is a frequent surgical procedure performed by dental surgeons. Bui CH et al., in a retrospective cohort study, analyzed 583 patients who had a total of 1,597 extracted third molars; the overall complication rate was 4.6%.1

Common postoperative complications are alveolar osteitis, bleeding, pain, swelling, trismus, abscess formation/osteomyelitis, excessive bleeding or hemorrhage, secondary infection, and chronic fistula associated with oroantral communication. Emphysema is a rare but serious complication and is defined a clinical state where air is present subcutaneously.1,4,6,10

More dental procedure such as crown preparation, endodontic therapy, oral surgery procedures such as sinus lift, CO22 laser, NO2 cryomachine, air abrasive system, and dental restorations are recognized as a cause of subcutaneous emphysema.11,12,13,14,15

This rare complication occurs mainly in patients in the 3rd and 5h decade of life after the third molar removal, particularly during mandibular extractions and right-sided treatment. The use of an air syringe, high-speed handling, or their combination has been reported in most of the cases.16,17

Kung et al. described a similar case of subcutaneous emphysema after mandibular third molar removal, with swelling, pain, and difficulty in swallowing: the air progressed to the neck, but without pneumomediastinum. In this case, the authors decided to recover the patient and perform an incision and drainage of the air by the insertion of a cannula. The symptoms improved immediately after the drainage and the patient was discharged after 6 days with a complete resolution of the conditions after 2 weeks.18 Tay et al. reported a rare case of extensive cervicofacial subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and pneumorrhachis following third molar extraction. In this case, the patient experienced no pain, difficulty in swallowing, or respiratory distress, but the recovery was prescribed, and supplemental oxygen was given to the patient for 3 days in association with perfusion of intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. The patient was discharged after 5 days without symptoms.6 When the mucoperiosteal flap is reflected, the tooth is excised with a standard dental handpiece, air usually only invades the spaces around the tooth but sometimes penetrates the soft tissue through the flap and it can spread laterally into the buccal space, posteriorly into the masticatory space or lingually into the sublingual and submandibular space. Air in the masticatory spaces can track superiorly, gradually involving the pterygomandibular, submasseteric, and infratemporal areas, leading to the extracoronal space of the orbit. Subcutaneous emphysema is characterized by rapid onset, rarely associated with pain or functional defects.16

The pathognomonic sign of subcutaneous emphysema is crepitus on palpation: it is fundamental to differentiate this condition by other complications, which can similarly produce swelling of the soft tissues (hemorrhage, allergic reaction, or angioedema).19,20

North and Sulman described a case of emphysema after third molar extraction with the involvement of the vocal cords, which caused a persistent dysphonia due to a massive pneumomediastinum, which caused injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve.21 Generally, the condition resolves spontaneously without consequences for the patient. However, there are case reports in the literature, which have demonstrated that the air passage to the submandibular and parapharyngeal spaces could migrate downwards into the mediastinum: condition that could seriously compromise the patient’s health.22

Treatment is symptomatic: prophylactic antibiotic therapy, observation of the airway, and monitoring the progression of the extension of the gas are recommended. Most cases of subcutaneous emphysema usually start improving after 3-5 days and may completely solve after 7-10 days. In rare cases, hospitalization is required.17

Prevention of emphysema requires minimal mucoperiosteal flap elevation, preservation of muscle attachments, gentle retraction of mucoperiosteal flap and the use of contra-angle multiplier (1:5) handpieces, which do not use high-speed air flow when working. Patient should be also advised to avoid dangerous procedures such as self-insufflation of drugs or strong nose blowing during the convalescence period.23

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of subcutaneous emphysema should be based on medical history and clinical examinations.

Immediate identification and early diagnosis of air emphysema are the keys to make an appropriate treatment plan. The use of contra-angles instead of air turbines during surgical extractions could avoid this complication and a prompt management of the patient could prevent severe progression to more dangerous conditions.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Subcutaneous emphysema is a rare but possible complication during third molar extraction. From the clinical point of view, it is important to carry out an early and appropriate differential diagnosis with other clinical cases that show swelling of the soft tissues. Although this situation is benignant and self-limiting, it is important to make an early recognition to avoid life-threatening conditions.

REFERENCES

1. Bui CH Seldin EB Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(12):1379-1389. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001

2. Eklund SA Pittman JL. Third-molar removal patterns in an insured population. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132(04):469-475. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0209

3. Fasoulas A Boutsioukis C Lambrianidis T. Subcutaneous emphysema in patients undergoing root canal treatment: a systematic review of the factors affecting its development and management. Int Endod J 2019;52(11):1586-1604. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13183

4. Fehrle C Gillissen A. Mediastinal and Cutaneous Emphysema Following Dental Extraction. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019;116(12):212. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0212a

5. Shah N Shafi A Benech R et al. Extensive Post-Traumatic Surgical Emphysema Exacerbated by Cocaine Insufflation. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31(02):e114-e116. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005900

6. Tay YBE, Loh WS. Extensive subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and pneumorrhachis following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(12):1609-1612. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.023

7. Heyman SN Babayof I. Emphysematous complications in dentistry, 1960-1993: an illustrative case and review of the literature. Quintessence Int 1995;26(08):535-543.

8. Laurito D Lollobrigida M Graziani F, et al. Periodontal Effects of a Transposed Versus a Conventional Flap in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(03):708-711. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002541

9. De Biase A Mazzucchi G Di Nardo D et al. Prevention of Periodontal Pocket Formation after Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Using Dentin Autologous Graft: A Split Mouth Case Report. Case Rep Dent 2020;2020:1762862. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1762862

10. Di Nardo D Mazzucchi G Lollobrigida M et al. Immediate or delayed retrieval of the displaced third molar: A review. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11(01):e55-e61. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55379

11. Cuccia AM Geraci A. Cervicofacial and mediastinal emphysema after dental extraction. Dent Med Probl 2019;56(02):203-207. DOI: 10.17219/dmp/108615

12. Farina R Zaetta A Minenna L et al. Orbital and Periorbital Emphysema Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(11):2192.e1-2192.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.186

13. Mitsunaga S Iwai T Kitajima H et al. Cervicofacial subcutaneous emphysema associated with dental laser treatment. Aust Dent J 2013;58(04):424-427. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12119

14. Willy PJ McArdle P Peters WJ. Surgical emphysema and Collet-Sicard syndrome after cryoblockade of the inferior alveolar nerve. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;41(03):190-192. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00043-3

15. Liebenberg WH Crawford BJ. Subcutaneous, orbital, and mediastinal emphysema secondary to the use of an air-abrasive device. Quintessence Int 1997;28(01):31-38.

16. Bavinger JV. Subcutaneous and retropharyngeal emphysema following dental restoration: an uncommon complication. Ann Emerg Med 1982;11(07):371-374. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80367-3

17. Heyman SN Babayof I. Emphysematous complications in dentistry, 1960-1993: an illustrative case and review of the literature. Quintessence Int 1995;26(08):535-543.

18. Kung JC Chuang FH Hsu KJ et al. Extensive subcutaneous emphysema after extraction of a mandibular third molar: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2009;25(10):562-566. DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70550-9

19. McKenzie WS Rosenberg M. Iatrogenic subcutaneous emphysema of dental and surgical origin: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(06):1265-1268. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.050

20. Bohnenkamp DM. Subcutaneous facial emphysema resulting from routine tooth preparation: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(01):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90336-4

21. North L Sulman C. Subcutaneous emphysema and vocal fold paresis as a complication of a dental procedure. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019;124:76-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.05.033

22. Döngel I Bayram M Uysal IO et al. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum complicating a dental procedure. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2012;18(04):361-363. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.26817

23. Melville JC Balandran SS Blackburn CP et al. Massive Self-Induced Subcutaneous Cervicofacial, Pneumomediastinum, and Pneumopericardium Emphysema Sequelae to a Nondisplaced Maxillary Wall Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77(09):1867.e1-1867.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.05.010

________________________
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.