World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

An Evaluation of Tumor, Patient Characteristics and Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising from Different Types of Oral Epithelia

Amitha J Lewis, Karen Boaz, Manish Juneja, Aashima Mohindra, Mohan Baliga

Keywords : Mortality, Oral cancer, Prognosis, Recurrence, Squamous cell carcinoma, Survival analysis

Citation Information : Lewis AJ, Boaz K, Juneja M, Mohindra A, Baliga M. An Evaluation of Tumor, Patient Characteristics and Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising from Different Types of Oral Epithelia. World J Dent 2018; 9 (6):468-475.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1582

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy affecting the oral cavity. In spite of advanced therapeutic interventions, it is still a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The clinical presentation and prognosis of the carcinomas occurring at different sites in the oral cavity is varied and could be explained by the difference in the type of epithelia from which they originate. Therefore this study aimed to assess the patient and tumor characteristics, clinical presentation and behavior of a sample of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) to determine the parameters most likely to influence the prognosis based on the origin of the epithelium. Materials and methods: Eighty-nine cases of histologicallyproven oral squamous cell carcinoma with a minimum followup of three years were categorized based on their epithelia of origin. The clinical follow-up data and survival were collected from the patient\'s records. New malignancy grading by Anneroth et al. was utilized for histopathological grading following which the lymph nodes (in cases of neck dissection) were assessed for evidence of nodal metastasis. Results: Most of the carcinomas originated from the nonkeratinized epithelium (42.7% n = 38) followed by the keratinized epithelium. Carcinomas arising from the non-keratinized epithelium had the poorest outcome with a mortality of 27.7% (n = 10) and disease-free survival of 38.8% (n = 14) at the end of 36 months. Conclusion: The present study though limited in its sample size and follow-up concluded that the nature of epithelium of origin has a bearing on the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical significance: Knowledge of the prognostic significance of the oral squamous cell carcinomas based on the type of epithelia of origin will help the clinicians to plan a more aggressive treatment plan for patients with carcinomas originating from the non-keratinized epithelium.


PDF Share
  1. Howell RE, Wright BA, Dewar R. Trends in the incidence of oral cancer in Nova Scotia from 1983 to 1997. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(2):205-212.
  2. Del Corso G, Villa A, Tarsitano A, Gohel A. Current trends in oral cancer: A review. Cancer Cell and Microenvironment 2016;3:e1332.
  3. Maringá V. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences 2014;36(2): 273-279
  4. Nanci A. Ten Cate's Oral Histology Development, Structure 7th and Function. Edition Mosby Inc. Noida. India 2008. P. 323-333.
  5. Rautava J, Luukkaa M, Heikinheimo K, Alin J, Grenman R, Happonen RP. Squamous cell carcinomas arising from different types of oral epithelia differ in their tumour and patient characteristics and survival. Oral Oncol. 2007; 43: 911-919.
  6. Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer 2002; 94(9): 2511-6
  7. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 28th edition W.B. Saunders Page 1434
  8. Baxi SS, Pinheiro LC, Patil SM, Pfister DG, Oeffinger KC, Elkin EB. Causes of death in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2014 May 15;120(10):1507-1513.
  9. Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand J Dent Res. 1987;95(3):229-49.
  10. Al-Rajhi N, Khafaga Y, El-Husseiny J, Saleem M, Mourad W, Al-Otieschan A, Al-Amro A. Early stage carcinoma of oral tongue: prognostic factors for local control and survival. Oral oncology. 2000;36(6):508-514.
  11. Oliveira LR, Ribeiro-Silva A, Costa JP, Simões AL, Di Matteo MA, Zucoloto S. Prognostic factors and survival analysis in a sample of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2008;106(5):685-695.
  12. Khandekar SP, Bagdey PS, Tiwari RR. Oral Cancer and Some Epidemiological Factors: A Hospital Based Study. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2006;31(3):157-159
  13. Shenoi R, Devrukhkar V, Chaudhuri, Sharma B K, Sapre S B, Chikhale A. Demographic and clinical profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective study. Indian J Cancer 2012;49:21-26
  14. Collins LM, Dawes C. The surface area of the adult human mouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and oral mucosa. Journal of dental research. 1987;66(8):1300- 1302.
  15. Squier CA. The permeability of oral mucosa. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1991;2(1):13-32
  16. Schmidt BL, Dierks EJ, Homer L, Potter B. Tobacco smoking history and presentation of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(9):1055-1058
  17. Presland RB, Jurevic RJ. Making sense of the epithelial barrier: what molecular biology and genetics tell us about the functions of oral mucosal and epidermal tissues. J Dent Educ. 2002;66(4):564-574.
  18. Tankéré F, Camproux A, Barry B, Guedon C, Depondt J, Gehanno P. Prognostic value of lymph node involvement in oral cancers: a study of 137 cases. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(12): 2061-2065.
  19. Shingaki S, Takada M, Sasai K, Bibi R, Kobayashi T, Nomura T, Saito C. Impact of lymph node metastasis on the pattern of failure and survival in oral carcinomas. The Am J S. 2003;185(3):278-284.
  20. Jesse RH, Fletcher GH. Treatment of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 1977;39:868-872
  21. Bartelink H, Breur K, Hart G, Annyas B, van Slooten E, Snow G. The value of postoperative radiotherapy as an adjuvant to radical neck dissection. Cancer.1983;52(6):1008-1013.
  22. Ildstad ST, Tollerud DJ, Bigelow ME, Remensnyder JP. A multivariate analysis of determinants of survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Surg. 1989;209(2):237-241.
  23. Braakhuis BJ, Tabor MP, Kummer JA, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2003;63(8):1727-1730
  24. Chen TY, Emrich LJ, Driscoll DL. The clinical significance of pathological findings in surgically resected margins of the primary tumor in head and neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13(6):833-837
  25. Mathew Iype E, Pandey M, Mathew A, Thomas G, Sebastian P, Krishnan Nair M. Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue among young Indian adults. Neoplasia. 2001;3(4): 273-277.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.