World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Assessment of Primary Caregiver\'s Burden in Oral Cancer Patients: A Descriptive Study

Anand Amirthraj, Subhagata Chakraborty, N Srikant, Partho S Chakraborty

Keywords : Burden, Oral cancer, Primary caregiver

Citation Information : Amirthraj A, Chakraborty S, Srikant N, Chakraborty PS. Assessment of Primary Caregiver\'s Burden in Oral Cancer Patients: A Descriptive Study. World J Dent 2018; 9 (5):412-417.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1572

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-10-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Caregiver burden refers to people\'s emotional response to the changes and demands of giving support to another. This study aims to highlight the burdens faced by the primary caregiver of oral cancer patients and assess which amongst them contributes to the highest stress. Materials and methods: The study was conducted at oncology ward of our hospital. The cross-sectional correlational study design was employed. The data was collected through a structured questionnaire. A total of 50 oral cancer patients\' primary caregivers consented to participate in the study. Two-step data analysis was done. First descriptive statistics were used to analyze the background characteristics. Then the patient\'s overall burden was calculated based on the scoring system obtained from ZBI. In the second step, regression analysis was done to predict the burden degree and also to find the main cause of the burden. Results: Binary logistic regression analysis revealed the following burdens (stressed managing to balanc–0.896, embarrassed–0.896, no privacy–0.980 and uncomfortable about having friends–1.094) as statistically significant. Again with those significant variables, forward stepwise logistic regression was done which revealed the following burdens (not enough time for themselves–0.013 and uncomfortable about having friends–0.023) very significantly associated. Conclusion: This study highlights that the caregivers, though burdened to some extent, wanted to take care of their relatives till the last day. Clinical significance: The purpose of the study was to create awareness among the professionals to give more importance to the primary caregiver. The importance of primary caregiver in the life of the diseased is paramount because of the emotional attachment they share. So this inter-relationship between the doctor, the patient, and the primary caregiver will help in a significant way in the wellbeing of the patient.


PDF Share
  1. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Dicker DJ, Chimed-Orchir O, Dandona R, Dandona L, Fleming T. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA oncology. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548.
  2. Tang ST, McCorkle R. Use of family proxies in quality of life research for cancer patients at the end of life: a literature review. Cancer Invest. 2002;20(7–8):1086511104.
  3. Zarit SH, Robertson SM. Positive dimensions of mental health. Taylor & Francis; 2006.
  4. DesRoches C, Blendon R, Young J, Scoles K, Kim M. Caregiving in the post-hospitalization period: findings from a national survey. Nurs Econ. 2002;20(5):216.
  5. Chandu A, Sun KC V, DeSilva RN, Smith ACH. The assessment of quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for oral cancer: a preliminary report. J oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(11):1606-1612.
  6. Sharpe L, Butow P, Smith C, McConnell D, Clarke S. The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14(2):102-114.
  7. Goldstein NE, Concato J, Fried TR, Kasl S V. Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer. J Palliat Care. 2004;20(1):38.
  8. Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist. 1990;30(5):583-594.
  9. Bédard M, Molloy DW, Squire L, Dubois S, Lever JA, O'Donnell M. The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):652-657.
  10. Bevan JL, Pecchioni LL. Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(3):356-364.
  11. Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles R, Huddart R, et al. Prostate cancer patients' support and psychological care needs: survey from a non-surgical oncology clinic. Psycho-Oncology. 2003;12(8):769-783.
  12. Hassanein KA-AM, Musgrove BT, Bradbury E. Psychological outcome of patients following treatment of oral cancer and its relation with functional status and coping mechanisms. J cranio-maxillo-facial Surg. 2005;33(6):404-409.
  13. Braun M, Mikulincer M, Rydall A, Walsh A, Rodin G. Hidden morbidity in cancer: Spouse caregivers. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(30):4829-4834.
  14. Bevans M, Sternberg EM. Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients. Jama. 2012;307(4):398-403.
  15. Taylor SE, Falke RL, Shoptaw SJ, Lichtman RR. Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986;54(5):608.
  16. Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(7):743-760.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.