World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2018 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review

Padma Ariga, Deepak Nallaswamy, Ashish R Jain, Dhanraj M Ganapathy

Citation Information : Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World J Dent 2018; 9 (1):68-75.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1509

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Various anthropometric measurements have been used to determine the size of maxillary anterior teeth. However, which anthropometric measurement is the most reliable indicator to determine the width of maxillary anterior teeth remains unclear.

Aims and objectives

To evaluate which anthropometric measurement is the most reliable indicator in determining the width of maxillary anterior teeth.

Materials and methods

An electronic search was conducted for scholarly articles discussing various anthropometric measurements used for determination of width of maxillary anterior teeth, written in English or translated into English listed with PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, and Google scholar databases. The search strategy yielded 119 articles. Out of them, 70 were excluded following reading of abstract, and 49 were selected for full-text reading. Of these, 21 were excluded based on exclusion criteria. Finally, 28 articles were included for final search. Due to heterogenicity of studies, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Results

High degree of correlation was seen between interalar width (IAD), interpupillary distance (IPD), bizygomatic width (BW), and width of maxillary anterior teeth, in Indian population, whereas in Saudi population, intercanthal distance (ICD) has high degree of correlation to the width of maxillary anterior teeth, and in Brazilian (mulatto and blacks) population, high degree of correlation was seen between intercommissural width (ICOW) and width of maxillary anterior teeth.

Conclusion

The anthropometric measurement used depends on the population group in which it is being used. There is no single anthropometric measurement that can be used to determine the width of maxillary anterior teeth. Hence, more studies with large sample size and different population groups need to be conducted.

Clinical significance

In Indian population, high degree of correlation was seen between IAD, IPD, BW, and width of maxillary anterior teeth. The results of the previous study should be validated by including a large population size spread over entire Indian subcontinent. This would also help to generate multiplication factor for various anthropological measurements for use limited to the Indian population.

How to cite this article

Jain AR, Nallaswamy D, Ariga P, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World J Dent 2018;9(1):68-75.


  1. Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth width and facial dimensions of 3 ethnicities. J Prosthet Dent 2017 Oct;118(4):504-510.
  2. Relationship between maxillary central incisor proportions and facial proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2016 Jun;115(6):741-748.
  3. Correlation between innercanthal distance and mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in a Thrissur, Kerala, India, Population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016 May;17(5):382-387.
  4. Selecting maxillary anterior tooth width by measuring certain facial dimensions in the Kurdish population. J Prosthet Dent 2016 Mar;115(3):329-334.
  5. A comparative study to find out the relationship between the inner inter-canthal distance, interpupillary distance, inter-commissural width, inter-alar width, and the width of maxillary anterior teeth in aryans and mongoloids. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2016 Feb;8:29-34.
  6. The relationship between innercanthal dimension and interalar width to the intercanine width of maxillary anterior teeth in central Indian population. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):91-97.
  7. Intercanine width as a tool in two dimensional reconstruction of face: an aid in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015 Jan-Apr;7(1):1-7.
  8. The relationship of maxillary canines to the facial anatomical landmarks in a group of Thai people. J Adv Prosthodont 2013 Nov;5(4):369-373.
  9. The significance of biometric parameters in determining anterior teeth width. Vojnosanit Pregl 2013 Jul;70(7):653-659.
  10. Biometric ratio in estimating widths of maxillary anterior teeth derived after correlating anthropometric measurements with dental measurements. Gerodontology 2013 Jun;30(2):105-111.
  11. Correlating the curve distance between the distal of the canines to the combined width of the six anterior teeth when selecting denture teeth for different ethnic groups. J Prosthet Dent 2012 Jun;107(6):400-404.
  12. Facial approximation: evaluation of dental and facial proportions with height. Afr Health Sci 2012 Mar;12(1):63-68.
  13. Quantifying the selection of maxillary anterior teeth using intraoral and extraoral anatomical landmarks. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011 Nov;12(6):414-421.
  14. Canine tip marker: a simplified tool for measuring intercanine distance. J Prosthodont 2011 Jul;20(5):391-398.
  15. Inner canthal distance and golden proportion as predictors of maxillary central incisor width in south Indian population. Indian J Dent Res 2010 Oct-Dec;21(4):491-495.
  16. Correlation of nasal width to inter-canine distance in various arch forms. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2010 Jun;10(2):123-127.
  17. Relationship between pterygomaxillary notches and maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthodontc 2010 Apr;19(3):231-234.
  18. Distance between the medialis angles of the eyes as an anatomical parameter for tooth selection. J Oral Rehabil 2009 Nov;36(11):840-847.
  19. Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009 Feb;21(1):26-35.
  20. Stature estimation using odontometry and skull anthropometry. Indian J Dent Res 2008 Apr-Jun;19(2):150-154.
  21. Nasal width as a guide for the selection of maxillary complete denture anterior teeth in four racial groups. J Prosthodont 2006 Nov-Dec;15(6):353-358.
  22. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18(4):196-205.
  23. Intercommissural width in 4 racial groups as a guide for the selection of maxillary anterior teeth in complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):513-515.
  24. Inner canthal distance and geometric progression as a predictor of maxillary central incisor width. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Jul;88(1):16-20.
  25. The relationship between intercanthal dimension and the widths of maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2001 Dec;86(6):608-612.
  26. The relationship of interalar width, interpupillary width and maxillary anterior teeth width in Saudi population. Odontostomatol Trop 1998 Dec;21(84):7-10.
  27. A comparison of interalar width and intercanine distance in Malay males and females. Anthropol Anz 1997 Mar;55(1):63-68.
  28. Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 1986 Feb;55(2):219-221.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.