World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2018 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of Effectiveness of Home Remedies for Toothbrush Decontamination using Vinegar and Vinegar with Common Salt

Arathi Rao, Vinay Mavani, Karuna Y Mahabala, Ethel Suman, P Anupama Nayak

Citation Information : Rao A, Mavani V, Y Mahabala K, Suman E, Anupama Nayak P. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Home Remedies for Toothbrush Decontamination using Vinegar and Vinegar with Common Salt. World J Dent 2018; 9 (1):19-23.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1500

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 00-02-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.



The aim of the study was to evaluate if vinegar and vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine gluconate for disinfection of toothbrushes.

Materials and methods

The study consisted of three groups: group I: 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, group II: 38% white vinegar, and group III: 38% white vinegar with 3.5% sodium chloride. Two new toothbrushes were cultured to check their sterility before use. Eight children in the age group of 6 to 12 years were given oral hygiene instructions and four sets of oral hygiene kits. At the end of the 1st week, one set of used toothbrushes was cultured to check for total viable count. Again at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sets of brushes were collected, subjected to respective decontamination treatment for 12 hours, and then cultured for microbial analyses. The obtained data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.


In group I, three out of eight brushes showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, in group II, one out of eight cases showed >10,000 colonies and two out of eight showed 1 to 10,000 colonies, and in group III, all the eight cases showed no colonies upon culturing.


Out of all the tested decontaminating agents, combination of 38% white vinegar and 3.5% sodium chloride was found to be the most efficient.

Clinical significance

Toothbrushes become contaminated upon use and act as a reservoir for microorganisms. Thus, toothbrush decontamination should become a routine practice. Testing the disinfecting efficacy of vinegar and common salt is, thus, beneficial as they are available in every kitchen.

How to cite this article

Mavani V, Mahabala KY, Suman E, Natarajan S, Nayak PA, Srikrishna SB, Rao A. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Home Remedies for Toothbrush Decontamination using Vinegar and Vinegar with Common Salt. World J Dent 2018;9(1):19-23.

PDF Share
  1. Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2011 Jan-Jun;1(1):20-26.
  2. The infected toothbrush, the infected denture, and transmission of disease: a review. Compendium 1992 Jul;13(7):592, 594, 596-598.
  3. Toothbrush contamination: a review of the literature. Nurs Res Pract 2012 Jan;2012:420630.
  4. Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination. Pediatr Dent 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):381-384.
  5. Effect of a single-use toothbrush on plaque micro flora. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Oct-Dec;20(4):404-406.
  6. Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes. Braz Oral Res 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):28-33.
  7. , Ito IY. Antimicrobial spray for toothbrush disinfection: an in vivo evaluation. Quintessence Int 2005 Nov-Dec;36(10):812-816.
  8. A quantitative approach to the effectiveness of ozone against micro biota organisms colonizing toothbrushes. J Dent 2008 Aug;36(8):600-605.
  9. Bacterial survival rate on toothbrushes and their decontamination with antimicrobial solutions. J Appl Oral Sci 2004 Apr-Jun;12(2):99-103.
  10. A comparison between chlorhexidine and some quaternary ammonium compounds with regard to retention, salivary concentration and plaque-inhibiting effect in the human mouth after mouth rinses. Arch Oral Biol 1978 Feb;23(4):289-294.
  11. Microbial contamination of tooth brushes and their decontamination. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003 Sep;21(3):108-112.
  12. Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultraviolet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: a comparative clinical study. J Basic Clin Pharm 2014 Dec;6(1):12-18.
  13. Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods. Braz Oral Res 2016;30(1):e6.
  14. Antibacterial actin of vinegar against food-borne pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Part 2). Effect of sodium chloride and temperature on bactericidal activity. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1997 May;71(5):451-458.
  15. Microbiological contamination of toothbrushes and identification of a decontamination protocol using chlorhexidine spray. Rev Odonto Cienc 2012;27(3):213-217.
  16. Crossover trials. In: Wang D, Bakhai A, editors. Clinical trials a practical guide to design, analysis, and reporting. Spain: Remedica Press; 2006. pp. 91-99.
  17. Toothbrush contamination: a potential health risk? Quintessence Int 1986 Jan;17(1):39-42.
  18. A study of toothbrush contamination at different time intervals and comparative effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions in reducing toothbrush contamination. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1996 Mar;14(1):10-13.
  19. Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-5.
  20. Vinegar as an antimicrobial agent for control of Candida spp. In complete denture wearers. J Appl Oral Sci 2008 Nov-Dec;16(6):385-390.
  21. Vinegar: medicinal uses and antiglycemic effect. MedGenMed 2006 May;8(2):61.
  22. In vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of vinegar against oral microorganisms: part I. J Int Oral Health 2016 Jan8(11):999-1002.
  23. The effect of sodium chloride and pH on the antimicrobial effectiveness of essential oils against pathogenic and food spoilage bacteria: implications in food safety. Int Sch Sci Res Innov 2011 Jan;5(9):572-577.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.