World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Osteoprotegerin Level Differences in Orthodontic Treatment with Self-ligating and Conventional Preadjusted Brackets at Early Aligning and Leveling Phase

Retno Widayati, Muhammad SK Adiwirya, Nurtami Soedarsono

Citation Information : Widayati R, Adiwirya MS, Soedarsono N. Osteoprotegerin Level Differences in Orthodontic Treatment with Self-ligating and Conventional Preadjusted Brackets at Early Aligning and Leveling Phase. World J Dent 2018; 9 (1):2-7.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1497

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

This study aims to investigate the differences in osteoprotegerin (OPG) concentrations in early aligning and leveling of orthodontic treatments using self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets.

Materials and methods

Three groups consisting of two experimental groups and one control group participated in this study. A total of 18 patients were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: Little's irregularity index on maxillary anterior teeth ranging from 4 to 9 mm, nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the experimental group, and no previous orthodontic treatment. The experimental group received orthodontic treatment with either a passive self-ligating or conventional preadjusted bracket system, while the control group did not receive orthodontic treatment. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection was done at baseline, 1, 24, and 168 hours on five points of maxillary anterior proximal sites, from the mesiolabial side of the canine to the mesiolabial side of its contralateral side. The OPG concentration was assessed by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

The OPG concentration on both bracket systems was decreased in a time-dependent manner. Decreasing concentration was maintained up until 168 hours on the self-ligating bracket, while conventional preadjusted bracket showed significantly increasing concentration at 168 hours (p = 0.004). Levels of OPG were significantly lower on self-ligating bracket compared with the conventional bracket at 1, 24, and 168 hours (p < 0.005).

Conclusion

Both bracket systems showed decreasing OPG concentration up to 24 hours after orthodontic activation. A maintained decreasing level of OPG was observed on the self-ligating bracket group at 168 hours, and it showed significant lower OPG concentration compared with the conventional preadjusted bracket group at 1, 24, and 168 hours after initial force application.

Clinical significance

The maintained decreasing level of OPG could indicate bone resorption that allows tooth movement into correct alignment that still occurs on self-ligating bracket up to 168 hours after initial activation.

How to cite this article

Widayati R, Adiwirya MSK, Soedarsono N. Osteoprotegerin Level Differences in Orthodontic Treatment with Self-ligating and Conventional Preadjusted Brackets at Early Aligning and Leveling Phase. World J Dent 2018;9(1):2-7.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Biology of orthodontic tooth movement: the evolution of hypotheses and concepts. In: Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z, editors. Biological mechanisms of tooth movement. 2nd ed. Ames (IA): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2015. pp. 15-29.
  2. Inflammation and tooth movement: the role of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Semin Orthod 2012 Dec;18(4):257-269.
  3. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Apr;129(4):469.e1-469.e32.
  4. Osteoprotegerin in gingival crevicular fluid under long-term continuous orthodontic force application. Angle Orthod 2008 Nov;78(6):988-993.
  5. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008 May;473(2):139-146.
  6. M-CSF mediates TNF-induced inflammatory osteolysis. J Clin Invest 2005 Dec;115(12):3418-3427.
  7. Biomarkers of orthodontic tooth movement in gingival crevicular fluid: a Systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015 Jul;16(7):578-587.
  8. Levels of RANKL and OPG in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement and effect of compression force on releases from periodontal ligament cells in vitro. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006 May;9(2):63-70.
  9. Effects of aging on RANKL and OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006 Aug;9(3):137-142.
  10. Induction of cytokines, MMP9, TIMPs, RANKL and OPG during orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 2013 Oct;35(5):644-651.
  11. Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: a 40-year perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015 Jun;147(6):654-662.
  12. OPG-RANKL levels after continuous orthodontic force. Gazi Med J 2013 Apr;24(2):33-36.
  13. The reliability of little's irregularity index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models. J Dent 2014 Oct;42(10):1320-1326.
  14. The simplified oral hygiene index. The Journal of The American Dental Association. 1964;68:7-13.
  15. The use of crevicular fluid prostaglandin E2 levels as a predictor of periodontal attachment loss. J Periodontal Res 1986 Mar;21(2):101-112.
  16. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976 May;72:248-254.
  17. The development and history of fixed appliances. In: Ludwig B, Bister D, Baumgaertel S, editors. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics: current concepts and techniques. New York: Thieme; 2012. pp. 2-6.
  18. The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Semin Orthod 2008 Mar;14(1):5-18.
  19. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth. Angle Orthod 2009 May;79(3):533-539.
  20. Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets. Dent Press J Orthod 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):91-97.
  21. Superficial morphology and mechanical properties of in vivo aged orthodontic ligatures. Dental Press J Orthod 2013 May-Jun;18(3):107-112.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.