World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Obturation Materials

K Kranthi Raja, Afaf Al-Haddad, Padmini Hari, Kiran P Singbal

Citation Information : Kranthi Raja K, Al-Haddad A, Hari P, P Singbal K. Comparison of Adaptability of Three Different Root Canal Obturation Materials. World J Dent 2017; 8 (6):452-456.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1485

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


Objective: The aim was to evaluate and compare the adaptability of the three obturation materials: gutta-percha, GuttaFlow, and Soft-Core to the root canal walls. Materials and methods: Totally 30 mandibular premolar teeth were selected. The teeth were standardized and prepared with ProTaper rotary files. The teeth were randomly and equally divided into three groups—gutta-percha group: obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer using lateral compaction technique; Soft-Core group: obturated using Soft-Core system; and GuttaFlow: obturated with GuttaFlow. The roots of the teeth were sectioned at three levels (apical, middle, and coronal) and were observed under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification. Area of voids (AVs), frequency of voids, and location of the voids were analyzed using image analysis software. Results: The lowest mean of AV was obtained by GuttaFlow 1.25% ± 1.93, followed by gutta-percha 1.33% ± 2.16, and Soft- Core 1.74% ± 2.23. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference among the three groups and the levels of the root. The frequency of voids in the coronal and the middle levels was more than the apical for all groups. The highest frequency of voids was detected in Soft-Core, followed by GuttaFlow and gutta-percha respectively. The voids were located in the interphase between sealer and obturation material as well as sealer and root canal walls in the gutta-percha and Soft-Core groups, whereas it was almost confined to the core for GuttaFlow group. Conclusion: GuttaFlow has a better adaptability to the walls compared with Soft-Core system and laterally compacted gutta-percha with AH Plus sealer. Clinical significance: GuttaFlow is an appropriate obturation material to enhance endodontic treatment.

PDF Share
  1. Schilder H. Filling root canal in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 1967 Nov:723-744
  2. Assessment of the sealing ability of a new root canal obturation material. J Endod 2006 Sep;32(9):876-878
  3. A fluid filtration comparison of gutta-percha versus resilon, a new soft resin endodontic obturation system. J Endod 2006 Jul;32(7):642-645
  4. The long-term sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta percha obturation techniques. Int Endod J 2002 Mar;35(3):275-282
  5. Long-term sealing ability of pulp canal sealer, AH-plus, gutta flow and epiphany. Int Endod J 2008 Mar;41(3):219-226
  6. In vitro microbial leakage of endodontically treated teeth using new and standard obturation techniques. J Endod 2004 Mar;30(3):154-158
  7. Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha techniques: thermafil, JS quick-fill, softcore, microseal, system B and lateral condensation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003 Jul;96(1):91-95
  8. Outcome of root canal treatment using soft-core and cold lateral compaction filling techniques: a randomized clinical trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 Jan 1;10(1):74-81
  9. Homogeneity and adaptation of a new gutta-percha paste to root canal walls. J Endod 2005 Sep;31(9):687-690
  10. Comparison of root canals obturated with pro taper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study. Braz J Oral Sci 2011;10:37-41
  11. Comparison of laterally condensed .06 and .02 tapered gutta-percha and sealer in vitro. J Endod 2001 Dec;27(12):786-788
  12. A comparison of apical sealing ability between guttaflow and AH plus: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016 Jul-Aug;6(4):377-382
  13. Dentinal wall adaptation of thermoplasticized gutta-percha in the absence or presence of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 1993 Nov;19(11):558-562
  14. Apical microleakage after lateral condensation, hybrid gutta-percha condensation and softcore obturation: an in vitro evaluation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999 Oct;15(5):239-243
  15. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001 Mar;34(2):137-141
  16. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1978 Jul;97(1):47-50
  17. Leakage of teeth root-filled with guttaflow and a single GP cone compared to lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation. SADJ 2009 Apr; 64(3):104, 106-108
  18. Comparison of seal after obturation techniques using a polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealer. J Endod 2006 Dec;32(12):1188-1190
  19. An in vitro assessment of apical microleakage in root canals obturated with gutta-flow, resilon, thermafil and lateral condensation: a stereomicroscopic study. J Conserv Dent 2011 Apr;14(2):173-177
  20. New selfcuring root canal filling material: Gutta flow 2. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2014;2:15-20
  21. Apical sealing ability of 2 epoxy resin-based sealers used with root canal obturation techniques based on warm gutta-percha compared to cold lateral condensation. Quintessence Int 2007 Mar;38(3):229-234.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.