World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Impacted Third Molars and Its Propensity to stimulate External Root Resorption in Second Molars: Comparison of Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Almas Binnal, Zeena V D'Costa, Junaid Ahmed

Citation Information : Binnal A, D'Costa ZV, Ahmed J. Impacted Third Molars and Its Propensity to stimulate External Root Resorption in Second Molars: Comparison of Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. World J Dent 2017; 8 (4):281-287.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1451

Published Online: 01-08-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).



This study was designed to compare the efficiency of conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) with panoramic radiography to discern external root resorption (ERR) in second molars.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study with a sample size of 50 participants who had a total of 120 impacted third molars visible on panoramic radiographs and CBCT images. The presence of ERR on the neighboring second molar was assessed and the position of impacted third molar was determined using Pell and Gregory classification. The ERR was registered according to Al-Khateeb and Bataineh's criteria. The location and severity were assessed by Ericson et al criteria, and grading of ERR was done as per the criteria given by Nemcovsky.


The CBCT was able to locate and identify extremely large number of cases with ERR on second molars in comparison with the panoramic radiographs. Based on Pell and Gregory classification, position B was most common. The ERR on second molars was most commonly seen at the cervical region. Most of the cases had mild severity. As per grading mentioned by Nemcovsky, maximum number of cases were given grade A followed by grade B.


According to our study and considering the threedimensional information obtained from CBCT, we found that ERR was better detected with CBCT.

Clinical significance

If on panoramic radiographs, a close contact is detected between the second molar and an impacted third molar, CBCT can be advised taking into account the “risk vs reward ratio.”

How to cite this article

D'Costa ZV, Ahmed J, Ongole R, Shenoy N, Denny C, Binnal A. Impacted Third Molars and Its Propensity to stimulate External Root Resorption in Second Molars: Comparison of Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. World J Dent 2017;8(4):281-287.

PDF Share
  1. Prospective analysis of frequency and contributing factors of nerve injuries following third-molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2010 May;21(3):784-786.
  2. Impacted mandibular third molars: presentation and postoperative complications at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2007 Jan-Mar;17(1):26-29.
  3. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod 2000 Dec;70(6):415-423.
  4. Periodontal health of orthodontically extruded impacted teeth. A split-mouth, long-term clinical evaluation. J Periodontol 2000 Nov;71(11):1708-1714.
  5. Long-term evaluation of estimates of need for third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000 Mar;58(3):288-291.
  6. Third molars: a review. Am J Orthod 1983 Feb;83(2):131-137.
  7. Asymptomatic mandibular third molars: oral surgeons’ judgment of the need for extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992 Apr;50(4):329-333.
  8. The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int 2002 Sep;33(8):613-617.
  9. Influence of lower third molar position on the incidence of preoperative complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2006 Dec;102(6):725-732.
  10. Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of third molar teeth? Update. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014 Feb;52(2):185-189.
  11. Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006 Nov;64(11):1598-1602.
  12. Unerupted mandibular third molars: symptoms, associated pathologies, and indications for removal in a Turkish population. Quintessence Int 2007 Sep;38(8):e497-e505.
  13. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2008 Jun;105(6):e41-e47.
  14. VI radiography and photography roentgenographic features of external root. Quintessence Int (Berl) 1982;1:51-55.
  15. Accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in detecting external root resorption. Iran Endod J 2014 Fall;9(4):241-245.
  16. Clinical and histological aspects of peripheral cervical resorption. J Periodontol 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):534-538.
  17. Root resorption of mandibular second molar teeth associated with the presence of the third molars. Aust Dent J 1999 Jun;44(2):112-116.
  18. Effect of non-erupted third molars on roots of approximal teeth. A radiographic, clinical and histologic study. J Oral Pathol Med 1997 Nov;26(10):464-469.
  19. Root resorption: types and treatment. Gen Dent 1997 Jan-Feb;45(1):42-45.
  20. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study. Biomed J 2013 Jan-Feb;36(1):18-22.
  21. Early radiographic diagnosis of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of maxillary incisors. Eur J Orthod 1998 Feb;20(1):57-63.
  22. Prevalence of impacted teeth and their radiographic signs in panoramic radiographs of patients referred to hamadan dental school in 2009. Avicenna J Dent Res 2011;3(1):21-27.
  23. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars. Indian J Dent Res 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):219-224.
  24. Journey from 2D to 3D : implant imaging a review. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2014;2014:091114
  25. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011 Aug;40(8):834-839.
  26. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42(1):98870341
  27. Assessment of the associated symptoms, pathologies, positions and angulations of bilateral occurring mandibular third molars: is there any similarity? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2009 Sep;108(3):e26-e32.
  28. Root resorption associated with impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979 Sep;48(3):281.
  29. The unpredictability of impacted third molar development – the danger of passive observation. Br Dent J 1990 Feb 10;168(3):92
  30. Root resorption associated with impacted maxillary third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992 Jun;73(6):765-766.
  31. Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996 Jul;82(1):10-17.
  32. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars. Review of 1001 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995 Feb;79(2):142-145.
  33. Does an impacted tooth cause root resorption of the adjacent one? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981 Mar;51(3):221-224.
  34. Effect of non-erupted 3rd molars on distal roots and supporting structures of approximal teeth. A radiographic survey of 202 cases. J Clin Periodontol 1996 Sep;23(9):810-815.
  35. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012 Mar 1;17(2):e281–e286.
  36. Does the canine dental follicle cause resorption of permanent incisor roots? A computed tomographic study of erupting maxillary canines. Angle Orthod 2002 Apr;72(2):95-104.
  37. Nonparametric statistics for health care research: statistics for small samples and unusual distributions. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015.
  38. Association between the presence of a partially erupted mandibular third molar and the existence of caries in the distal of the second molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012 Oct;41(10):1270-1274.
  39. Root resorption – diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol 2003 Aug;19(4):175-182.
  40. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014 Aug;72(8):1444-1455.
  41. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 Dec;136(6):764.e1-764.e11.
  42. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011 Feb;33(1):93-102.
  43. Cone beam computed tomography functionalities in dentistry. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2015;2015:040515
  44. A long-term, follow-up, radiographic evaluation of asymptomatic impacted third molars in orthodontically treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994 Oct;23(5):279-285.
  45. Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars – a conebeam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 Mar;73(3):379-386.
  46. Tooth eruption results from bone remodelling driven by bite forces sensed by soft tissue dental follicles: a finite element analysis. PLoS One 2013;8(3):e58803
  47. Mandibular third molar impactions in male adults: Relationship of operative time and types of impaction on inflammatory complications. J Int Oral Health 2014 Apr;6(2):9-15.
  48. The unerupted or impacted third molar – a critical appraisal of its pathologic potential. J Can Dent Assoc 1989 Mar;55(3):201-207.
  49. CBCT – a paradigm shift in the management of dental impactions. Indian J Multidiscip Dent 2011;1(2):64-118.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.