World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Evaluation of the Four most commonly used Pediatric Liquid Formulations in Ahmedabad City: An in vitro Study

Karthik Venkataraghavan

Citation Information : Venkataraghavan K. Comparative Evaluation of the Four most commonly used Pediatric Liquid Formulations in Ahmedabad City: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2017; 8 (3):190-195.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1436

Published Online: 01-06-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).



This study was conducted to assess the cariogenic potential of pediatric liquid medicaments (PLMs) of Allopathic, Homeopathic, Ayurvedic, and Unani formulations specifically in Ahmedabad.

Materials and methods

Four commonly used PLMs were selected based on a survey. Thirty-nine exfoliated deciduous teeth samples were placed in selected PLM for 1 minute, 10 minutes, and 8 hours and observed under scanning electron microscope to check the erosive potential. Their endogenous pH, calcium dissolution potential, viscosity, and type and amount of sugar were checked.


In all the four groups, a specific type of enamel prism pattern was seen in all the samples irrespective of magnification and immersion time. However, the degree of erosion increases with the increase in immersion time. All the four syrups were acidic in nature. Lowest pH (3.73) and highest calcium dissolution (7.106) were seen in Saduri®. Viscosity was higher with Benadryl® mainly due to high sugar content (36.10), especially glucose (27.21).


All the PLMs used in this study showed an erosive effect on the primary enamel surface though major effect was seen with Saduri®.

Clinical significance

With respect to this study, Unani medications are most cariogenic for the teeth among all the four types of medications in children.

How to cite this article

Shah V, Venkataraghavan K, Choudhary P, Trivedi K, Shah S, Bhandi S. Comparative Evaluation of the Four most commonly used Pediatric Liquid Formulations in Ahmedabad City: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2017;8(3):190-195.

PDF Share
  1. Pediatric medicines and their relationship to dental caries. Braz J Pharm Sci 2010 Jan-Mar;46(1):157-164.
  2. Pediatricians’ perceptions of the use of sweetened medications related to oral health. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008 Winter;32(2):133-137.
  3. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 1975;9(5):373-387.
  4. Pediatric liquid medicaments – do they erode the teeth surface? An in vitro study: Part I. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008 Spring;32(3):189-194.
  5. In vitro study of enamel erosion caused by soft drinks and lemon juice in deciduous teeth analysed by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 1996;30(5):373-378.
  6. Erosive potential of medicated syrups on primary teeth: an in-vitro comparative study. Br J Med Med Res 2015;5(4):67-74.
  7. In vitro analysis of the cariogenic and erosive potential of paediatric antitussive liquid oral medications. Tanzan J Health Res 2012 Apr;14(2):139-145.
  8. Fluoride concentration and pH of pediatric medicines regularly and long-term used by children. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011 May 1;16(3):e459–e462.
  9. Erosive effect of an antihistamine liquid formulation on bovine teeth: influence of exposure time. Braz J Oral Sci 2010;9(1):20-24.
  10. Cariogenic potential of pediatric liquid medicaments – an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012 Summer;36(4):357-362.
  11. Free sugar concentration and pH of paediatric medicines in Brazil. Community Dent Health 2005 Sep;22(3):180-183.
  12. Evaluation of total soluble solids content (TSSC) and endogenous pH in antimicrobials of pediatric use. Indian J Dent Res 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):498-501.
  13. Sweeteners and endogenous pH of pediatric medicines [Abstract B – 110]. J Dent Res 2000;79:1130
  14. Cariogenic and erosive potential of the medication used by HIV-infected children: PH and sugar concentration. Community Dent Health 2008 Sep;25(3):170-172.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.