World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Overview of the Current Survival Status and Clinical Recommendation for Porcelain Fused to Metal vs All-ceramic Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures

Karishma V Vijan

Citation Information : Vijan KV. An Overview of the Current Survival Status and Clinical Recommendation for Porcelain Fused to Metal vs All-ceramic Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures. World J Dent 2017; 8 (2):145-150.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1428

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Vijan KV. An Overview of the Current Survival Status and Clinical Recommendation for Porcelain Fused to Metal vs All-ceramic Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures. World J Dent 2017;8(2):145-150.


PDF Share
  1. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results. J Prosthet Dent 2012 Jun;107(6):373-379.
  2. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater 2012 Jan;28(1):102-111.
  3. All-ceramic restorations in different indications: a case series. J Am Dent Assoc 2011 Apr;142(Suppl 2):14S-19S.
  4. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015 Jun;31(6):603-623.
  5. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J Dent 2009 Sep;37(9):731-736.
  6. A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting. J Dent 2012 Jun;40(6):527-530.
  7. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials 2006 Feb;27(4):535-543.
  8. Ceramics: porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry. Vol. 6. Ch. 20. 2012. p. 509-514.
  9. From porcelain-fused-tometal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):83-96.
  10. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Feb;93(2):143-147.
  11. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006 Oct;96(4):237-244.
  12. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006 Feb;26(1):31-41.
  13. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008 Sep;139(Suppl):14S-18S.
  14. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metalceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999 Nov-Dec;12(6):519-526.
  15. Metal release from dental biomaterials. Biomaterials 1986 May;7(3):163-175.
  16. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998 Oct;80(4):450-456.
  17. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):478-484.
  18. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007 Nov;35(11):819-826.
  19. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012 Mar;107(3):170-177.
  20. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci 2010 Oct;118(5):443-450.
  21. Survival of zirconia-and metalsupported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):493-502.
  22. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study. J Dent 2013 Dec;41(12):1164-1174.
  23. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006 Dec;96(6):433-442.
  24. Survival rates of all-ceramic systems differ by clinical indication and fabrication method. JADA 2008;139:8S-13S.
  25. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007 Jun;18(Suppl 3):218-231.
  26. Residual stress measurement by successive extension of a slot: the crack compliance method. Appl Mech Rev 1999;52(2):75-96.
  27. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011 Apr;55(2):333-352, ix.
  28. Evaluation of bond strength of various margin ceramics to a zirconia ceramic. J Dent 2008 Oct;36(10):822-827.
  29. Bond strength of different veneering ceramics to zirconia and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Am J Dent 2010 Aug;23(4):213-216.
  30. Microtensile bond strength of three different veneering porcelain systems to a zirconia core for all ceramic restorations. Am J Dent 2010 Dec;23(6):347-350.
  31. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013 Oct;57(4):236-261.
  32. Single-tooth all-ceramic restorations. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry. Chapter 20. 2012. p. 496-507.
  33. Effect of multiple firing and silica deposition on the zirconia-porcelain interfacial bond strength. Dent Mater 2012 Jul;28(7):763-768.
  34. Zirconia-porcelain bonding: effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2013 Oct;15(5):467-472.
  35. The effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength of core-veneer zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 2013 Jan;22(1):49-53.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.