World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relationship between Perception of Maxillary Midline Diastema and Personality Profiles

Abdullah A Al Nazeh

Citation Information : Nazeh AA. Relationship between Perception of Maxillary Midline Diastema and Personality Profiles. World J Dent 2016; 7 (2):59-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1365

Published Online: 01-06-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between personality profiles and perception of maxillary midline diastema (MMD) among laypeople.

Materials and methods

Hundred total of 200 laypeople (100 females and 100 males, mean age = 28.8 ± 5.5 years) were recruited in this cross-sectional study. They were asked to rate the attractiveness of two digital photographs of ideal smile with 1 and 2 mm MMD on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Participants' personality and psychological profiles were assessed via neuroticism.extraversion.openness five-factor inventory. The statistically significant levels were set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The mean VAS scores were 5.7 (± 2.1) and 4.3 (± 2.0) for 1 and 2 mm MMD respectively. The participants rated the attractiveness of 1 mm diastema better than the attractiveness of 2 mm diastema (p < 0.001). Females showed no difference in rating diastema attractiveness in comparison with males (p > 0.05). Participants (from both genders) with higher neuroticism scores rated 1 and 2 mm diastemas as less attractive than those with lower neuroticism scores (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Psychological profiles (high neuroticism) might be associated with negative perceptions of attractiveness of MMD.

How to cite this article

Al Nazeh AA. Relationship between Perception of Maxillary Midline Diastema and Personality Profiles. World J Dent 2016;7(2):59-63.


PDF Share
  1. Treating a maxillary midline diastema in adult patients: a general dentist's perspective. J Am Dent Assoc 2011 Nov 30;142(11):1258-1264.
  2. Midline diastema and its aetiology – a review. Dent Update 2014 Jun;41(5):457-460, 462-464.
  3. Postretention stability after orthodontic closure of maxillary interincisor diastemas. J Appl Oral Sci 2014 Oct;22(5):409-415.
  4. Simple case treatment planning: diastema closure. Dent Clin N Am 2015 Jul 31;59(3):655-664.
  5. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2011 Aug 1;33(4):450-456.
  6. Perception of Saudi dentists and lay people to altered smile esthetics. Saudi Dent J 2013 Jan 31;25(1):13-21.
  7. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners. Int Orthod 2013 Dec 31;11(4):432-444.
  8. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: a symmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 Aug 31;130(2):141-151.
  9. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009 Jul;79(4):634-663.
  10. Laypersons’ esthetic perception of various computergenerated diastemas: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014 Oct 31;112(4):914-920.
  11. Change in frequency of the maxillary midline diastema appearing in photographs of Caucasian females in two fashion magazines from 2003 to 2012. J Orthod 2014 Jun;41(2):98-101.
  12. Prevalence of artificially created maxillary midline diastema and its complications in selected Nigerian population. Afr Health Sci 2015 Mar 11;15(1):226-232.
  13. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion among 12–18 years old secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Odontostomatol Trop 2005 Mar;28(109):39-48.
  14. Factors affecting patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2006 May;76(3):422-431.
  15. Relationship between oral healthrelated quality of life, satisfaction and personality in patients with prosthetic rehabilitations. J Prosthodont 2010 Jan 1; 19(1):2-9.
  16. Relationship between personality and impacts of implant treatment on daily living. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012 May 1;14(Suppl 1):e2–e10.
  17. Changes in quality of life during orthodontic correction of midline diastema. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S162-S164.
  18. Relationship between impacts of removable prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living, satisfaction and personality profiles. J Dent 2014 Mar 31;42(3):366-372.
  19. Relationship between impact of maxillary anterior fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living, satisfaction, and personality profiles. J Prosthet Dent 2016 Feb;115(2):170-176.
  20. Comparison of personality traits, attitude toward orthodontic treatment, and pain perception and experience before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2015 Oct 15; 85(3):474-479.
  21. Dental smile esthetics: the assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin Orthod 2012 Sep 30; 18(3):193-201.
  22. The effect of malocclusion and self-perceived aesthetics on the self-esteem of a sample of Jordanian adolescents. Eur J Orthod 2010 Dec 1;32(6):638-644.
  23. Combining normative and psychosocial perceptions for assessing orthodontic treatment needs. J Dent Educ 2008 Aug 1;72(8):876-885.
  24. Impacts on daily performances attributed to malocclusions by British adolescents. J Oral Rehabil 2009 Jan 1;36(1):26-31.
  25. McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. PAR Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Florida, USA, 1992.
  26. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. J Pers Assess 1998 Apr 1;70(2): 263-276.
  27. Psychological impact on implant patients’ oral health related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 Apr 1;17(2):116-123.
  28. Relationship between patients’ oral health-related quality of life, satisfaction with dentition and personality profiles. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 Nov 1;10(6):E049-E056.
  29. Relationship between impacts of complete denture treatment on daily living, satisfaction and personality profiles. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011 May 25;12(3):200-207.
  30. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995 Dec 1;17(6):505-512.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.