World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Survey to Evaluate the Awareness of Various Treatment Modalities to Replace Missing Teeth among Patients Visiting Kasturba Hospital, Manipal: A Prosthodontic Perspective

SV Siva Teja, Vishnu Ravi Kumar, Vinu Thomas George

Citation Information : Teja SS, Kumar VR, George VT. A Survey to Evaluate the Awareness of Various Treatment Modalities to Replace Missing Teeth among Patients Visiting Kasturba Hospital, Manipal: A Prosthodontic Perspective. World J Dent 2015; 6 (4):217-221.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1346

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background

The disabilities associated with oral health; like missing teeth, are many. The management of these disabilities is of utmost importance to any dental practitioner.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted at the outpatient department (OPD) of Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, located in Udupi district of South-West Karnataka, with a population of 11.7 lakh of whom 305 patients (146 females and 159 males) took part in the study to assess their awareness to various treatment options available to replace missing teeth.

The subjects filled out a close-ended questionnaire of 11 questions; clinical examination of the oral cavity then followed. They all had at least 1 missing tooth (3rd molars excluded). The data were analyzed using SPSS Version 2.0, with a Chi-square test significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Of the 305 patients who participated, 69.2% of males and females wanted to get their teeth replaced.

The remaining 15.2% males and 12.6% females who did not want to get their teeth replaced stated that the lack of time prevented them from doing so. A total of 5% of females and a 1.4% of males said that previous traumatic dental experience prevented them from getting treatment.

Majority of both men and women were aware of the removable partial prosthesis as a treatment option (71.9% males and 74.9% females). A small portion of the study group, 21.9% males and 25.2% of females were aware of dental implants.

The most preferred treatment option, chosen by 53.5% females and 49.3% males was the fixed partial prosthesis (tooth supported).

These findings indicate that 56% of women were more inclined to avail treatment for missing teeth, and only 44% of men felt the need to avail treatment.

A total of 76.7% males and 76.1% females felt that their masticatory functions were affected.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that awareness regarding implants is lacking, and that motivation brought about by outreach programs has not yet reached most sections of the Indian society.

How to cite this article

Teja SVS, Kumar VR, George VT. A Survey to Evaluate the Awareness of Various Treatment Modalities to Replace Missing Teeth among Patients Visiting Kasturba Hospital, Manipal: A Prosthodontic Perspective. World J Dent 2015;6(4):217-221.


PDF Share
  1. Edentulousness, denture wear and denture needs of Indian elderly—a communitybased study. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:467-476.
  2. Dental beliefs, knowledge, and behavior of Chinese people in the United Kingdom. Community Dent Health 1999;16:33-39.
  3. Complete denture success for patients and dentists. Int Dent J 2003;53:340-345.
  4. Sentiments expressed in relation to tooth loss: a qualitative study among edentulous Saudis. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:515-520.
  5. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998;184:90-93.
  6. Influence of psychological factors on the acceptance of complete dentures. Gerodontol 2001;18:35-40.
  7. A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69(10):662.
  8. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2004:6-23.
  9. Part ial edentulousness in a rural population based on Kennedy's classification: an epidemiological study. J Ind Prosthodont Soc 2009;9:18-23.
  10. Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J 2000;189:598-603.
  11. Attitudes of Saudi male patients toward the replacement of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(6):571-577.
  12. Patients’ self-perceived impacts and prosthodontic needs at the time and after tooth loss. Braz Dent J 2007;18:91-96.
  13. Variation in dental health in 70-year-old men and women in Goteborg, Sweden: a crosssectional epidemiological study including longitudinal and cohort effects. Swed Dent J 1984;8:29-48.
  14. Social and functional: impact of reduced posterior dental units in older adults. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:1-10.
  15. Trends, awareness and attitudes of patients towards replacement of missing teeth at University College of Dentistry. Pak Oral Dent J 2014;34(1):190-193.
  16. Dental visits among older US adults, 1999: the roles of dentition status and cost. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1154-1162.
  17. Tooth loss, the wearing of dentures and associated factors in Sri Lankan older individuals. Gerodontol 2005;22:193-199.
  18. Single-tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities. BMC Oral Health 2011;11:34.
  19. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:401-408.
  20. Treatment need for fixed metal ceramic bridge prosthesis in patients treated by dental students in 1984-1996. J Oral Rehab 2001;28: 1101-1105.
  21. Future of dentistry and dental workforce. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133: 1226-1235.
  22. Sociodemographic factors and edentulism: the Nigerian experience. BMC Oral Health 2004;4(1):3.
  23. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(5):621-633.
  24. Public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(2):228-232.
  25. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(2):223-229.
  26. Single-tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities. BMC Oral Health 2011;11:34.
  27. Needs and demands of prosthetic treatment among two groups of individuals. Ind J Dent Res 2010;21:564-567.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.