Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickeltitanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:807-813.
Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments: Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2006;39:196-202.
Comaprative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2004; 37:229-238.
A comparative study of root canal preparation using Flex Master and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36:358-366.
Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004;37:359-364.
Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary NiTi instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:593-601.
A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:715-718.