An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-351.
A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:500-506.
A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 1995;21(4):173-176.
Effectiveness of nickel-titanium files for preparing curved root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 11(3):121-123.
Rationale for the use of low-torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16(3):95-100.
A new root canal instrument and instrumentation technique: a preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:198-207.
Shaping ability of lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in stimulated root canals: Part 1. J Endod 1997;23:698-702.
Online information available at http://www.tulsadental.com/PDFs/ProSystem_GT_brochure_BR108_3-03C.pdf (accessed June 2013).
Online information available at http://store.tulsadental.com/catalog/protaper_main.htm (Accessed July 2013).
Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 2001;14: 324-333.
Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296.
An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33:297-310.
Online information available at http://www.k3endo.com/index.htm (accessed July 2013).
Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence Int 2010;41:479-488.
Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile0.04 rotary instruments during preparation of curved canals. Int Endod J 2002;35(4):379-389.
Effect of coronal-radicular flaring on apical transportation. J Endod 1991;17(4):147-149.
Effect of preflaring on Root ZX apex locators. J Endod 1999;25(9):625-626.
An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endod 1984;10(10):491-498.
Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. Int Endod J 1998;31:268(4)-274.
Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J 1998;31(4):259-267.
An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999;25:441-445.
Evaluation of rotary root canal instruments in vitro: a review. Endo 2007;1(3):189-203.
Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickeltitanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:807-813.
Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments: Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2006;39:196-202.
Comaprative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2004; 37:229-238.
A comparative study of root canal preparation using Flex Master and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36:358-366.
Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004;37:359-364.
Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary NiTi instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:593-601.
A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:715-718.
