Citation Information :
Wali A, Siddiqui TM, Shamim A, Majeed T, Khan M. Attitude and Practice toward Delivering of Verbal Postoperative Instructions by Undergraduates and Trainees: A Descriptive Study. World J Dent 2015; 6 (2):71-76.
Dentists’ knowledge and attitudes toward oral health concern provides the structure for their professional work and should be able to convey evidence-based knowledge of oral healthcare to the community. The delivery of safe and appropriate care and instructions to patients is of prime importance to dental professionals.
Materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted for analysis of attitude and practice toward delivering of postoperative instructions by undergraduates and trainees. A cluster sampling technique was used and 220 forms were distributed in five dental institutes of Karachi. Two hundred forms were fully filled and returned. Students of final year and house surgeons were included in the study. Data were statistically analyzed for frequencies and percentages with Chi-square test using SPSS version 19.
Results
The result of the present study reported that 124 (62%) of the respondents informed the patients that how long the anesthesia will last and numbing wears off. One hundred and eleven (55.5%) of the respondents delivered verbal postoperative instructions after amalgam restoration and 127 (63.5%) after composite restorations. One hundred and thirty-one (65.5%) of the respondents informed patients about temporary filling materials. One hundred and twenty-two (61%) of the respondents delivered the verbal instructions after placing a post or doing core build-ups. Ninety-nine (49.5%) of the respondents verbally explained the importance of full coverage crown.
Conclusion
The present study concluded that majority of the students and trainees are lacking in uttering the required postoperative instructions after restorative treatment.
How to cite this article
Wali A, Siddiqui TM, Shamim A, Majeed T, Khan M. Attitude and Practice toward Delivering of Verbal Postoperative Instructions by Undergraduates and Trainees: A Descriptive Study. World J Dent 2015;6(2):71-76.
Knowledge of and attitudes towards preventive dental care among Iranian dentists. Eur J Dent 2007;1(4):222-229.
Approaches to improve access to dental care services. Int Dent Med J Adv Res 2015;1:1-4.
What is new in governance for conscious sedation in dental practice? Saad Digest 2013;29: 3-8.
Education and motivation in oral health—Preventing diseases and promoting health in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Dent Press J Orthod 2011;16:95-102.
Development of education and motivation program of the patient to the periodic return. Robrac 2000;9:37-40.
Practical marketing for dentistry, part 3: relationship marketing and patient/customer satisfaction. Br Dent J 1996;180(12):467-472.
Factors of patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction in a dental faculty outpatient clinic in Turkey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28(6):461-469.
Factors influencing patient loyalty to dentist and dental practice. Br Dent J 1997;183(10):365-370.
Patient mobility in Australian dentistry. Community Dent Health 1996;13(2):99-104.
Convergence and divergence: assessing criteria of consumer satisfaction across general practice, dental and hospital care settings. Soc Sci Med 1991;33(6):707-716.
Patient satisfaction in a regular and after-hours dental clinic. Spec Care Dentist 1996;16(5):194-198.
Monitoring patient satisfaction with university dental services under two fee-paying systems. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29(5):390-398.
Use of services, care-seeking behavior and satisfaction among university dental clinic patients in Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1984;12(5):297-302.
Treatment outcomes with mandibular removable partial dentures: a population based study of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(1):36-45.
Patient-evaluated dentistry: development and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for fixed prosthodontic treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24(4):332-341.
Patient compliance to instructions after oral surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:216-219.
The effects of postoperative preparatory information on the clinical course following third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:1165-1170.
An examination of patients understanding of information from healthcare providers. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1984;35:619-620.
Assessment of patient remembrance and satisfaction of post surgical instructions: verbal vs verbal and written instructions: a clinical trial. e-Journal of Dentistry 2012;2(4): 246-250.
Local anesthetic failure in endodontics; mechanisms and management. Endod Top 2002; 1:26-39.
Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87(3):284-293.
Neurochemical factors in injury and inflammation in orofacial tissues. In: Lavigne G, Lund J, Sessle B, Dubner R, editors. Orofacial Pain: Basic Sciences to Clinical Management. Chicago: Quintessence; 2001. p. 45-52.
Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(12):1699-1705.
Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. Techniques of Mandibular Anesthesia; p. 227-253.
The missed inferior alveolar block: a new look at an old problem. Anesth Prog 1984;31:87-90.
Pain management in dental practice: tramadol vs codeine combinations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130(7):1075-1079.
What is the cause of failure of local anesthesia? Revue Belge Med Dent 2000;55(1):41-50.
Assessing the duration of mandibular soft tissue anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126(11):1531-1536.
Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2005.
Pediatr Dent 2005;27(Suppl 7):101-106.
Localized complications from local anesthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26(9):677-682.
Effect of bonding systems on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites. Am J Dent 2006;19(3):151-154.
Failure risk of posterior composites with postoperative sensitivity. Oper Dent 2003;28(6):681-688.
Fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publication; 2006. p. 289-339.
A review of the incidence of pain after an operative treatment visit—part I. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(2):224-225.
Postoperative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1988;13(2):66-73.
Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(2): 229-231.
Postoperative pain following bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22(2):66-71.
Postoperative sensitivity in class V composite restorations: comparing soft start vs constant curing modes of LED. J Conser Dent 2011(14):1:76-79.
Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, TERM, and Fermit: a 21-day in vitro study. J Endod 1999;25(10):653-659.
‘A comparative study of four zinc oxide and eugenol formulations as restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1969;21(2): 176-183.
Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, and TERM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74(5):634-643.
Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater 1999;15(3):158-165.
Comparative study of the physical properties of core materials. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2002;22(4):355-363.