World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cleaning of Root Canals using Protaper and K3 Rotary Systems: A SEM Study

K Shashikala, BS Keshava Prasad, Anukriti Tyagi

Citation Information : Shashikala K, Keshava Prasad B, Tyagi A. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cleaning of Root Canals using Protaper and K3 Rotary Systems: A SEM Study. World J Dent 2015; 6 (1):20-25.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1307

Published Online: 01-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Tyagi A, Prasad BSK, Shashikala K. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cleaning of Root Canals using Protaper and K3 Rotary Systems: A Sem Study. World J Dent 2015;6(1):20-25.


PDF Share
  1. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: Protaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2004;37(4):239-248.
  2. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2002;35(5):422-427.
  3. The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system. Endodontic Topics 2005;10(1):179-182.
  4. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: Profile. 04 and GT rotary. Int Endod J 2007;40(7):553-562.
  5. A comparative SEM investigation of the smear layer following preparation of root canals using nickel titanium rotary and hand instruments. J Oral Sci 2007;49(1);47-52.
  6. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94(6):658-66.
  7. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and Protaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004;37(12):832-839.
  8. Retention and wear in three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J 2006;32(3):107-111.
  9. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles. Stomatologija Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 2006;8(3):70-75.
  10. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET and Protaper instruments. Acta Medica Lituanica 2006;13(4):249-257.
  11. The removal of smear layer using the Quantec system. A study using the scanning electron microscope. Int Endod J 1999;32:217-224.
  12. The K3 rotary nickel-titanium file system. Dent Clin N Am 2004;48:137-157.
  13. The efficacy of different rotary instrumentation techniques on canal cleanliness: A comparative electron microscope study. Karolinska Institutet. 2004.
  14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and Protaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2005;38:8-16.
  15. Evaluation of rotary root canal instruments in vitro: a review. Endodontology 2007; 1(3):189-203.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.