World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of Three Dentinal Sealers on Retention of Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study

Ashish R Jain, R Pradeep, Sashi Deepth Reddy Janapala, P Sesha Reddy

Citation Information : Jain AR, Pradeep R, Janapala SD, Reddy PS. The Effect of Three Dentinal Sealers on Retention of Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2015; 6 (1):10-15.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1305

Published Online: 00-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Dentinal sealers (desensitizing agents) are used to protect the pulp from possible injurious effects after tooth preparation and also prevent the penetration of dentinal tubules by bacteria and their products which are currently thought to cause most of the pulpal inflammation under the crowns.

Aim

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of effect of three different desensitizing agents on retention of crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

Materials and methods

Forty freshly extracted maxillary first premolars were notched for retention and the teeth specimens were mounted in autopolymerising resin. The axial height of all the specimens was 4 mm with a 20° angle of convergence. Impressions of the prepared teeth were made, later waxed invested and casted. Thirty teeth were coated with three different desensitizing agents were used in this study: Cavity varnish (Namuvar, Deepti Dental Products), Glutaraldehyde (Gluma- Heraeus Kulzer), Resin (AdheSE, Ivoclar Vivadent). Ten teeth were not coated with desensitizing agents to act as control group. Independent T test used to compare the mean values between groups.

Results

Tensile strength for average surface area of the groups I, II, III and IV are 0.3759, 0.2375, 0.2411, 0.2348 respectively. The t-test shows ‘p’-value is statistically not significant (p < 0.05) for groups II and III, where as in group IV ‘p’-value is statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The use of AdheSE/resin-based dentinal sealer showed increase in bond strength of the crowns luted with resin-modified glass ionomer cement when compared with control group. This study advocates the use of resin-based sealer or a glutaraldehyde-based sealer before cementation of the crowns. The cavity varnish, however, reduces the bond strength and is not acceptable.

How to cite this article

Janapala SDR, Reddy PS, Jain AR, Pradeep R. The Effect of Three Dentinal Sealers on Retention of Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2015;6(1):10-15.


PDF Share
  1. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response. JADA 1987;114:607-611.
  2. Dentin permeability: Self-etching and one bottle dentin bonding systems. JPD 2003;90:42-49.
  3. The effect of varnish on dentinal bonding of five dental cements. JPD 1976;35:403-406.
  4. Effect of resin sealing of dentin on the bond strength of ceramic restorations. Dental Materials 2002; 18:304-310.
  5. The effect of resin densensitizing agents on crown retention. JADA 1997;128:195-200.
  6. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold casting. JPD 1961;11:487-500.
  7. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crown using standardized crown preparations. JPD 2000;83:459-465.
  8. O'Meara, Jan A, et al. Dentin permeability: Effect of cavity varnishes and bases JPD 1985;53:511-516.
  9. Crown retention with use of 5% gluteraldehyde sealer on prepared dentin. JPD 1998;79:671-676.
  10. The effect of resin based sealer on crown retention for three types of cements. JPD 2004;91:428-431.
  11. Retention of metal ceramic crowns cemented with resin cements: effects of preparation taper and height. JPD 1996;76:524-529.
  12. s., Omar. Retentive strength, disintegration and marginal quality of cements. JPD 1992;68:269-274.
  13. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structure. Dental Materials 2004;20:322-329.
  14. Acidity of conventional luting cements and their diffusion through boving dentine. Int Endodont J 2003;36:622-628.
  15. Pulp reaction crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation and permanent cementation. JPD 1965;15:129-143.
  16. The effect of environmental pressure charges during diving on the retentive strength of different luting agents for full cast crowns. JPD 1997;78: 522-527.
  17. Effect of a fluoride varnish on the maginal leakage and retention of luted provisional crowns. JPD 2003;89:70-75.
  18. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesive, glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements and a computer in contact with dentin caries sample. Operat Dentist 2000;25:265-269.
  19. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. JPD 1998;80:280-301.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.