World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of a New Generation Anticavity Mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus Count: A Microbiological Study

Karthik Venkataraghavan, Shanal Shah

Citation Information : Venkataraghavan K, Shah S. Effectiveness of a New Generation Anticavity Mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus Count: A Microbiological Study. World J Dent 2014; 5 (3):152-156.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1278

Published Online: 01-09-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the antibacterial effect of a new generation anticavity mouthwash (CariFree CTx4 treatment rinse) with that of a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (Clohex), 0.05% sodium fluoride mouthwash (Colgate Plax Complete Care), 2% povidone iodine mouthwash (Betadine gargle and mouthwash) against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Materials and methods

Strains of S. mutans and L. acidophilus were grown on suitable media and the inhibitory effect of the test substances was noted by disk diffusion method and Agar well diffusion method. The results obtained were then subjected to statistical analysis.

Result

Efficacy of CTx4 treatment rinse mouthwash was less than chlorhexidine for both S. mutans and L. acidophilus whereas its efficacy was comparable to that of povidone iodine and sodium fluoride mouthwash for S. mutans and to that of sodium fluoride for L. acidophilus.

Conclusion

It was concluded that chlorhexidine is still the best mouthwash available.

How to cite this article

Venkataraghavan K, Shah S, Choudhary P, Kaur M, Shah S, Trivedi K. Effectiveness of a New Generation Anticavity Mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus Count: A Microbiological Study. World J Dent 2014;5(3):152-156.


PDF Share
  1. Antimicrobial activity of propolis against streptococcus mutans. Afr J Biotechnology 2010;9(31):4966-4969.
  2. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in 9-and 13-year-old Italian school children and the relation to oral health. Clinical Oral Investigations 1999;3(1): 7-10.
  3. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine and sodium fluoride mouthwashes on streptococcus mutans. J Nepal Dental Association 2011 Jan-Jun;12(1):17-21.
  4. Effect of povidone-iodine on streptococcus mutans in children with extensive dental caries. Pediatric Dentistry 2004 Jan-Feb; 26(1):5-10.
  5. Mouthwashes; Australian Prescriber 2009; 32(6):162-164.
  6. Effects of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine mouth rinses on the bond strength of an orthodontic composite. Angle Orthodontics 2005 May;75(3):392-396.
  7. Effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate-containing mouthwash on the vitality and antimicrobial Susceptibility of in vitro oral bacterial ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003Aug;69(8):470-476.
  8. Comparison of the antibacterial effects of persica mouthwash with chlorhexidine on streptococcus mutans in orthodontic patients. J Pharmac Sci 2006;14(4):178-182.
  9. The antimicrobial potential of ten often used mouthwashes against four dental caries pathogens. J Microbiology 2010;3(1):15-27.
  10. Antimicrobial efficacy of herbal and chlorhexidine mouth rinse—a systematic review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 2012 Nov-Dec;2(4):5-10.
  11. Comparative in vitro evaluation of efficacy of mouthrinses against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli and Candida albicans. Oral Health Preven Dent 2011;9(3):261-268.
  12. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of sodium fluoride, chlorhexidine and triclosan mouth rinses in reducing the mutans streptococci count in saliva: an in vivo study. J Ind Soc Pedodon Preven Dent 2003 Sep;21(3):98-104.
  13. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinses. J Clin Periodon 1978 Aug;5(3):198-205.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.