World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2014 ) > List of Articles


The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Matheus Coelho Bandéca, Vinicius Ibiapina Mascarenhas, Lívia Jacovassi Tavares, Lara Maria Ferreira Mendes

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, Mascarenhas VI, Tavares LJ, Mendes LM. The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review. World J Dent 2014; 5 (1):60-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1259

Published Online: 01-03-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Mascarenhas VI, de Molon RS, Tavares LJ, Mendes LMF, Tonetto MR, Bandeca MC. The use of Computer Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Rehabilitation: A Literature Review. World J Dent 2014;5(1):60-63.

PDF Share
  1. Computer-guided planning and placement of dental implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2012;20(1): 53-79.
  2. An alternative method for flapless implant placement and an immediate provisional crown: a case report. J Contemp Dent Prac 2009;10(3):89-95.
  3. Computer-guided surgery in implantology: review of basic concepts. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(6):1917-1921.
  4. Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach. J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2008;66(5):1015-1021.
  5. Guided surgery for implant therapy. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2011;23(2):239
  6. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intraoral techniques. J Oral Implant 1990;16(3): 156-164.
  7. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci 2006;48(1): 27-34.
  8. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2004;19(2):228-231.
  9. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111-120.
  10. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clinical Oral Implants Research 2000;11(5):409-414.
  11. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dento Maxillofacial Radiology 2000;29(1):46-51.
  12. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computerguided template-based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009;20 Suppl 4:73-86.
  13. Computerguided implant placement in a patient with severe atrophy. The Journal of Oral Implantology 2008;34(4):203-207.
  14. Flapless implant surgery using an image-guided system. A 1-to 4-year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2010;12(2):142-152.
  15. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012;23 Suppl 6:124-135.
  16. Inpatient evaluation of periodontal, esthetic and inflammatory parameters around dental implants and natural teeth. J Contemp Dent Prac 2013;14(1):90-95.
  17. Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012.
  18. Comparison of soft tissue healing around implants in beagle dogs: flap surgery versus flapless surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 2013;115(3):e21-27.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.