World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

To Evaluate the Effect of Presence and Absence of Smear Layer with Different Instruments and Obturation Methods on Microleakage of Root Canal-Filled Teeth: An in vitro Study

Dinesh Shetty, Veerendra Uppin, Priyadarshini Shetty

Citation Information : Shetty D, Uppin V, Shetty P. To Evaluate the Effect of Presence and Absence of Smear Layer with Different Instruments and Obturation Methods on Microleakage of Root Canal-Filled Teeth: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2013; 4 (2):103-107.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1213

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the effects of presence and absence of smear layer with different instruments and obturation methods on microleakage of root canal-filled teeth.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 extracted human maxillary central incisors with closed apices and single roots were taken for the study. The teeth were divided into six groups A to F consisting of 15 teeth each. Control group consisted of 10 teeth with five positive and five negative teeth each.

Groups A, B, C and D were instrumented with rotary files and groups E and F were instumented with conventional stainless steel files.

Groups A, B, C and D were flushed with 3 ml of EDTA to remove the smear layer prior to obturation. All teeth were flushed with 5% NaOCl, then obturated with AH-26 sealer with lateral condensation technique on groups C, D, E, F and injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique on groups A and B.

Using electrochemical technique the current flow in the circuit was observed for 45 days. The magnitude of the current for each tooth was directly proportional to the extent of leakage. At the intervals of 10, 20, 30 and 45 days the groups A-F were compared to identify statistically significant differences using students t-test.

Results

Significantly less microleakage occurred when the smear layer was removed and when the canals were obturated with thermoplasticized gutta-percha. Canals instrumented with engine driven NiTi files exhibited less leakage than hand instrumented canals.

Conclusion

Rotary instrumentation of the root canals provides a superior preparation in comparison to hand instrumentation. Removal of smear layer increases the resistance of microleakage. Thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation appears to provide a superior seal as compared to lateral condensation.

How to cite this article

Shetty P, Uppin V, Shetty D. To Evaluate the Effect of Presence and Absence of Smear Layer with Different Instruments and Obturation Methods on Microleakage of Root Canal-Filled Teeth: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2013;4(2):103-107.


PDF Share
  1. Smear layer influence on the apical seal of four different obturation techniques. J Endod 2000;26(6):351-54.
  2. An apical leakage study in the presence and absence of smear layer. Int Endod J 1994;27: 87-93.
  3. An in vitro study of smear layer removal and microbial leakage along root canal fillings. Int Endod J 1996;29:99-107.
  4. Comparison of laterally condensed and low temperature thermoplasticized gutta percha root fillings. J Endod 2000;26(12):733-38.
  5. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14(7):346-51.
  6. A comparison of root canal preparation using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven and K-flex endodontic instruments. 1995;21(3):146-51.
  7. The assessment of apical leakage of root-filled teeth by the electrochemical technique. Aust Dent J 1993;38(1):22-27.
  8. The investigation of microleakage in root canal therapy. Oral Surg Oral Path Oral Med 1976;42(6):817-23.
  9. Electrochemical microleakage study of endodontic sealer/cements. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55(4):402-07.
  10. Scanning electron microscopic examination of root canal filling materials. J Endod 1976;2(4):98-110.
  11. Microleakage of four root canal sealer cements as determined by electrochemical technique. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;56(1):80-88.
  12. Comparison and reliability of techniques for measuring leakage and marginal penetration. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53(4):410-16.
  13. Evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical and coronal sealing ability of two sealers. J Endod 2004;30(6):406-09.
  14. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials. J Endod 1984;10(12):558-61.
  15. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endod 1986;12(1):21-27.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.