World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Facial Divine Proportions in Attractive North Indian Females: A Photographic Study

Anand Awadhesh Tripathi, Ragni Pradip Tandon, Navin Hantodkar

Citation Information : Tripathi AA, Tandon RP, Hantodkar N. Facial Divine Proportions in Attractive North Indian Females: A Photographic Study. World J Dent 2013; 4 (1):41-46.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1200

Published Online: 00-03-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to find the divine proportion in young attractive North Indian women.

Materials and methods

Thirty young unmarried women perceived to be attractive out of 100 subjects (18-26 years age group) representing North Indian population were selected by a panel of judges from different background. Divine proportions were evaluated in these women by using Ricketts RM (1982) Divine Proportion Analysis on frontal facial photographs.

Results and observations

The subjects in the group adhered to the golden proportions. The ‘t’ test was significant (t < 2.05) for facial height and width ratios.

Conclusion

Ratios in transverse and vertical dimension as well as soft tissue of attractive face affirm to the divine proportion.

How to cite this article

Tripathi AA, Tandon RP, Hantodkar N. Facial Divine Proportions in Attractive North Indian Females: A Photographic Study. World J Dent 2013;4(1):41-46.


PDF Share
  1. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006;76:204-10.
  2. The biologic significance of divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982 May;81(5):351-70.
  3. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1964;50:421-33.
  4. The golden divider. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:752-59.
  5. Musical and architectural proportions in anatomy of facial system: An anthropometric approach. Angle Orthod 1982;52:177-212.
  6. Natural head position: A revival. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:512-13.
  7. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1974;73:648-57.
  8. A photographic study of soft tissue profile in Negro population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1977;72:373-85.
  9. A panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304.
  10. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:514-18.
  11. Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese population. Br J Orthod 1991;18:43-49.
  12. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;10: 180-87.
  13. A critical appraisal of measurement of the soft tissue outline using photographs and video. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:397-409.
  14. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:164-68.
  15. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:1-7.
  16. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. E J Orthod 2002;24:1-7.
  17. Objective measures as indicators for facial esthetics in white adolescents. Angle Orthod 2006;76:551-56.
  18. Assessment of facial golden proportion among young Japanese women. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:168-74.
  19. Contemporary orthodontics (3rd ed). St. Louis: Mosby 1997;157-63.
  20. Divine proportion in the growing face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:472-79.
  21. An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;3:757-74.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.