World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of a Grander-Modified Adhesive System to Bovine Dentin

Daphne Câmara Barcellos, Cesar Rogério Pucci, Maria Filomena Rocha Lima Huhtala, Eduardo Bresciani, Daniel Gomes Duarte, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves

Citation Information : Barcellos DC, Pucci CR, Huhtala MF, Bresciani E, Duarte DG, de Paiva Gonçalves SE. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of a Grander-Modified Adhesive System to Bovine Dentin. World J Dent 2012; 3 (2):176-179.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1152

Published Online: 01-06-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the Grander technology on the shear bond strength of total-etch adhesive system Single Bond 2 to dentin.

Materials and methods

Forty bovine incisors were used. They were sectioned and the buccal surfaces worn down with abrasive paper. Acid etching was performed, and the specimens were divided into two groups (n = 20): Group G1—Single Bond 2 adhesive system (3M ESPE) under normal conditions; group G2—Single Bond 2 adhesive system modified by physical contact for 48 hours with the flexible unit Grander system. The resin composite was inserted with the aid of a metallic matrix over the prepared area. After the mechanical shear test, data were submitted to the statistical t-test (5%). The t-test showed that the results for G1 and G2 were similar (p > 0.05). The mean values (± SD) were: G1—6.66 (± 2.40); G2—5.26 (± 2.15).

Conclusion

Grander technology did not influence the initial shear bond strength of the Single Bond 2 adhesive system to dentin.

How to cite this article

Duarte DG, de Paiva Gonçalves SE, Barcellos DC, Huhtala MFRL, Bresciani E, Pucci CR. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of a Grander-Modified Adhesive System to Bovine Dentin. World J Dent 2012;3(2):176-179.


PDF Share
  1. Dentin Bond strenght: Influence of laser irradiation, acid etching and hypermineralization. J Clin Med Surg 1999;17:77-859.
  2. Permeability of demineralizated dentin to HEMA. Dent Mater 2000;16:7-14.
  3. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9:167-73.
  4. Surface and adhesion phenomens. In Materiais Dentários. Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana, 1981.
  5. A comparative study of the physical properties of conventional and Grander-modified adhesive systems. J Dent Sci 2011;26(4):315-20.
  6. Influence of the Grander technology in the physical properties of the self-etch adhesive system. World J Dent 2012;3(1):1-5.
  7. Physical and physical-chemical data in the application of revitalized and non-revitalized water and the use of Grander water revitalization in industry. March, 2000. [serial online] Available at: http://www.grander-tecnologie.com/en/wissenschaft-forschung/DiplomarbeitUniGrass.php. Accessed May 26, 2011.
  8. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 1991 Feb;22(2):73-74.
  9. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992(Suppl 5):137-50.
  10. Effect of collagen removal on shear bond strength of two single-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2000;25(5):395-400.
  11. Factors that affect the shear bond strength of multiple component and single bottle adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2003 Apr;16(2):120-24.
  12. Grander system—a new technology to reduce surface tension of adhesive systems in dentistry. 2011; No prelo.
  13. Multipurpose adhesives: Evaluation of bond strength to dentin by the shear test. Braz Dent Sci 1996;25:113-21.
  14. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991;3(4):133-38.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.