World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2011 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparing the Efficacy of Plaque Removal between Salvadora persica (Miswak) and Manual Toothbrush in 12 to 15 Years School Children

Aruna M Devi, Pooja Hampannavar, G Radha, Sushi Kadanakuppe, SR Nagashree, Vinod A Kumar

Citation Information : Devi AM, Hampannavar P, Radha G, Kadanakuppe S, Nagashree S, Kumar VA. Comparing the Efficacy of Plaque Removal between Salvadora persica (Miswak) and Manual Toothbrush in 12 to 15 Years School Children. World J Dent 2011; 2 (1):29-33.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1049

Published Online: 00-03-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To compare the efficacy of plaque removal between chewing stick (Miswak—Salvadora persica) and manual toothbrush in 12 to 15 years old school children.

Methods

A randomized, examiner-blind, parallel design study was conducted over a 2-month period, among 12 to 15 years old students of Sri Sajjan Rao Vidya Samasthe, Bengaluru. A sample size of 60 subjects was randomly allocated into two groups, 30 subjects in group A (manual toothbrush) and 30 subjects in group B (chewing stick). The plaque index (Turesky et al, modified Quigley Hein plaque index) was used for base line, pre- and postintervention assessment. Then the data was collected and subjected to statistical analysis and the test used was Student-t test.

Results

The results were given separately for between and within group comparison. The difference in mean PI score between toothbrush users and tooth stick users is found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). Higher mean PI score was found in tooth stick users compared to toothbrush users and the mean difference was statistically significant. The difference in mean PI score in both the groups, before and after intervention was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Manual toothbrush and Miswak tooth sticks (Salvadora persica) both are effective in removal of plaque, but manual toothbrush was more effective than Miswak tooth stick, which was statistically significant.


PDF Share
  1. wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvadora_persica/ Retrieved August 12, 2009.
  2. Miswak: The natural toothbrush. Journal of Clinical Dentistry 19978(5):125-29.
  3. Knowledge and behavior related to oral health among secondary school students in Khartoum Province, Sudan. Int Dent J 2005;55(4):224-30.
  4. Indian plants and drugs with their medical properties and uses (1st ed). 2005;348.
  5. Comparative effect of chewing sticks and toothbrushing on plaque and gingival health. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry 2005;4:301-07.
  6. Int Dent J 2000;50:139.
  7. “Acceptance Program Guidelines for Toothbrushes”, 1998; http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/standards/Guide_toothbrushed.pdf, Retrieved September 25, 2007.
  8. Efficiency of traditional chewing sticks in oral hygiene programs among Ethiopian school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;6:105-09.
  9. Miswak chewing stick versus conventional toothbrush as an oral hygiene aid. Clin Preventive Dent 1990;12:19-23.
  10. Effect of two common Nigerian chewing sticks on gingival health and oral hygiene. Odonto-Stomatologie Tropicale 1999.
  11. Three-month assessment of safety and efficacy of two electric toothbrushes. J of Dent 2005;33(Suppl 1):23-28.
  12. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol 1970;41:41-43.
  13. Cleaning effectiveness of chewing sticks among Tanzanian school children. J Cli Periodontol 1992;19:460-63.
  14. The effectiveness of chewing stick miswak on plaque removal. Saudi Dental Journal 2006;18(3):125-33.
  15. Periodontal status of a subject sample of Yemen. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:437-43.
  16. Chewing sticks versus toothbrushes in West Africa. Clin Preventive Dent 1989;11:11-13.
  17. The relationship between chewing sticks (miswak) and periodontal health (Part 1). Quintessence Int 1990;21:913-17.
  18. Significance of chewing sticks (miswak) in oral hygiene from a pharmacological view point. J Pak Med Assoc 1981;31:89-95.
  19. The effect of the extract of the Miswak (Chewing stick) used in Jordan and the Middle East on oral bacteria. Int Dent J 1995;45:218-22.
  20. Inhibition of peptidase and glycosidase activities of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides intermedius and Treponema denticola by plant extracts. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:305-10.
  21. The antimicrobial effects of bark and pulp extracts of miswak (Salvadora persica). Biomedical Letters 1999;60:71-75.
  22. Plants used as chewing sticks. J Prev Dent 1980;6:71-73.
  23. Botanicals promoting oral and dental hygiene: A Review. RJPBCS April-June 2010;1(2):202-06.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.