World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of Salivary pH on Dental Caries Index and Periodontal Status: A Cross-sectional Study

Hamdan Alamri

Keywords : Dental caries, Oral health, Periodontal disease, Salivary hydrogen ion concentration

Citation Information : Alamri H. Influence of Salivary pH on Dental Caries Index and Periodontal Status: A Cross-sectional Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (7):617-620.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2444

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-10-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the current investigation was to assess the impact of salivary hydrogen ion concentration (pH) on dental caries index and periodontal status. Materials and methods: After obtaining the subjects’ informed consent, the current cross-sectional study involved a total of 120 participants. Subjects were then divided into three groups of 40 each: group I—clinically healthy gingiva, group II—gingivitis, and group III—periodontitis. The following characteristics were observed during the clinical examination: salivary pH, probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index, gingival index, and decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) score. The clinical findings were statistically analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Results: In the clinically healthy gingival group, the mean salivary pH was 7.09 ± 0.06, and the mean DMFT score was 7.2 ± 3.12. In the gingivitis group, the mean salivary pH was 7.02 ± 0.09, and the mean DMFT score was 7.9 ± 4.03. In the periodontitis group, the mean salivary pH was 6.87 ± 0.04, and the mean DMFT score was 8.4 ± 3.86. There was no significant difference found between the groups. The salivary pH in the healthy gingiva group was alkaline (7.09 ± 0.06) with a plaque score of 0.44 ± 0.02, compared to the periodontitis group (6.87 ± 0.04) with a plaque score of 2.38 ± 0.22. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups. The probing PD (6.96 ± 0.32) and CAL (7.89 ± 0.28) were observed in the periodontitis group with a salivary pH of 6.87. Conclusion: In conclusion, the DMFT index and salivary pH exhibit a significantly inverse relationship. The group with clinically healthy gingiva showed the least caries experience and better periodontal status, followed by the gingivitis group and then the periodontitis group. Clinical significance: Saliva plays a crucial role in regulating the progression of dental caries and periodontal disease, two of the most common disorders globally. It is a complex fluid that aids in maintaining dental hygiene and microbial flora. Saliva has predictive and diagnostic utility and varies in composition.


PDF Share
  1. Villalobos-Rodelo JJ, Medina-Solís CE, Maupomé G, et al. Socioeconomic and sociodemographic variables associated with oral hygiene status in Mexican schoolchildren aged 6 to 12 years. J Periodontol 2007;78(5):816–822. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060324
  2. Kubala E, Strzelecka P, Grzegocka M, et al. A review of selected studies that determine the physical and chemical properties of saliva in the field of dental treatment. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:6572381. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6572381
  3. Van Nieuw Amerongen A, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC. Salivary proteins: protective and diagnostic value in cariology? Caries Res 2004;38(3):247–253. DOI: 10.1159/000077762
  4. Singh S, Sharma A, Sood PB, et al. Saliva as a prediction tool for dental caries: an in vivo study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2015;5(2):59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.05.001
  5. Alkhateeb AA, Mancl LA, Presland RB, et al. Unstimulated saliva related caries risk factors in individuals with cystic fibrosis: a cross-sectional analysis of unstimulated salivary flow, pH, and buffering capacity. Caries Res 2017;51:1–6. DOI: 10.1159/000450658
  6. Prasad M, Toshi, Sehgal R, et al. Periodontal disease and salivary pH: case control study. IAIM 2019;6(2):1–6.
  7. Manikandan S, Ayyappan, Ilanchez hian T, et al. Salivary pH as a diagnostic marker of oral health status. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2018;51(1):41–44.
  8. Henskens YM, van der Weijden FA, van den Keijbus PA, et al. Effect of periodontal treatment on the protein composition of whole and parotid saliva. J Periodontol 1996;67(3):205–212. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.205
  9. Schultze LB, Maldonado A, Lussi A, et al. The impact of the pH value on biofilm formation. Monograph Oral Sci 2021;29:19–29. DOI: 10.1159/000510196
  10. Braine NR, Centanini IA, Pontes LS, et al. Evaluation of the salivary pH and its correlation with dental caries in a population of Brazilian adolescents. Concilium 2023;23(6):430–439. DOI: 10.53660/CLM-1152-23D29
  11. Hurlbutt M, Novy B, Young D. Dental caries: a pH-mediated disease. CDHA Journal-Winter 2010;25(1):9–15.
  12. Baliga S, Muglikar S, Kale R. Salivary pH: a diagnostic biomarker. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17(4):461–465. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.118317
  13. Galgut PN. The relevance of pH to gingivitis and periodontitis. J Int Acad Periodontol 2001;3(3):61–67. PMID: 12666943.
  14. Flores-de-Jacoby L, Bruchmann S, Mengel R, et al. Periodontal conditions in Rio de Janeiro City (Brazil) Using the CPITN. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19(2):127–128. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00127.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.