World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Different Occlusal Caries Detection Methods: A Comparative Study

Abdullah B Nabhan

Keywords : Laser fluorescence, Occlusal caries, Sensitivity, Specificity, Visual examination

Citation Information : Nabhan AB. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Different Occlusal Caries Detection Methods: A Comparative Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (6):468-471.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2421

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 05-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the extent and level of accuracy of two different occlusal caries detection techniques. Materials and methods: Freshly extracted 40 permanent human premolars for orthodontic or periodontal reasons were utilized in the study. The current study used two different methods of testing—a visual examination and an air-water syringe. Occlusal surfaces were inspected under a normal dental operatory light. Laser fluorescence examination—the DIAGNOdent (DD) pen tip was positioned perpendicular to the testing location, and the area where the lesion progressed more was recorded by rotating the pen tip. For every site, three readings were taken in a row, and all the teeth underwent both tests. Following section photography and attachment to a stereomicroscope set to ×10 magnification, the samples were validated. The student's t-test was used for intragroup and intergroup comparisons, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results: On visual examination, with air-drying score was 1.418, and without air-drying was 1.722. On laser fluorescence examination, with air-drying score was 1.142, and without air-drying, it was 1.286. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were determined using the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis approach was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). The diagnostic accuracy was higher (88.4%) in laser fluorescence examination with air-drying, with 93.7% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy without air-drying was 85.8% with 88.2% sensitivity and 63.2% specificity. On visual examination, the diagnostic accuracy with air-drying was 84.2% with 90.4% sensitivity and 70.3% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy without air-drying was 75.8% with 74.8% sensitivity and 76.4% specificity. Conclusion: In conclusion, enhanced efficacy in terms of sensitivity and specificity has been demonstrated by both the visual and laser fluorescence (DD) methods. However, the DD laser fluorescence instrument has demonstrated better diagnostic performance for occlusal caries. Clinical significance: Dental caries is a common chronic condition that affects virtually all individuals in developing nations. Early caries detection is essential for successful remineralization and a better prognosis. The subjective nature of visual examination makes it difficult for many healthcare professionals worldwide to diagnose smooth surface caries in their early phases, and newer methods are required to identify them.


PDF Share
  1. Neuhaus KW, Ellwood R, Lussi A, et al. Traditional lesion detection aids. Monogr Oral Sci 2009;21:42–51. DOI: 10.1159/000224211
  2. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35(3):170–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x
  3. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res 1997;31(3):224–231. DOI: 10.1159/000262404
  4. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 2002;62(4):201–213. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03446.x
  5. Costa AM, Yamaguti PM, De Paula LM, et al. In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries. ASDC J Dent Child 2002;69(3):249–253. PMID: 12613306.
  6. Zaidi I, Somani R, Jaidka S. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and intraoral camera for detection of occlusal caries. Indian J Dent Sci 2010;2:15–20.
  7. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, et al. Detection, diagnosing, monitoring and logical treatment of occlusal caries in relation to lesion activity and severity: an in vivo examination with histologic validation. Caries Res 1998;32(4):247–254. DOI: 10.1159/000016460
  8. Souza JF, Boldieri T, Diniz MB, et al. Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28(1):287–295. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1154-8
  9. Carounanidy U, Sathyanarayanan R. Dental caries: a complete changeover (part II)—Changeover in the diagnosis and prognosis. J Conserv Dent 2009;12(3):87–100. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.57631
  10. Attrill D, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001;190(8):440–443. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800998
  11. Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dental Res 2004;83(Spec No C):C35–C38. DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301s07
  12. Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JCP. Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 2004;38(2):104–108. DOI: 10.1159/000075933
  13. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gokalp S. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 2005;36(6):417–422. PMID: 15954247.
  14. Sridhar N, Tandon S, Rao N. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20(3):326–331. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.57376
  15. Anttonen V, Seppa L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children. Caries Res 2003;37(1):17–23. DOI: 10.1159/000068227
  16. Francescut P, Lussi A. Correlation between fissure discoloration, DIAGNOdent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 2003;25(6):559–564. PMID: 14733470.
  17. Burin C, Loguercio AD, Grande RH, et al. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of laser fluorescence and conventional methods. Pediatr Dent 2005;27(4):307–312. PMID: 16317971.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.