World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Efficacy of Different Remineralizing Agents and Iontophoresis-enhanced Remineralization on Surface Microhardness: An In Vitro Study

Anshu Gupta, Navneet Kukreja, Anamika Thakur, Sunpreet Kaur, Swati Chhabra, Urvashi Sukhija

Keywords : Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, Grape seed extract, Iontophoresis, NovaMin, Vicker's hardness

Citation Information : Gupta A, Kukreja N, Thakur A, Kaur S, Chhabra S, Sukhija U. Comparative Efficacy of Different Remineralizing Agents and Iontophoresis-enhanced Remineralization on Surface Microhardness: An In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (4):331-335.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2412

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-05-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy of different remineralizing agents and to evaluate the beneficial role of iontophoresis along with remineralizing agents. Materials and methods: A total of 120 specimens were divided into four groups—control group (n = 15), demineralized group (n = 15), remineralized group (n = 45), and remineralized + iontophoresis group (n = 45). The remineralized group was further divided into subgroup A = casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) (n = 15), subgroup B = 8% grape seed extract (GSE) (n = 15), and subgroup C = NovaMin (n = 15). The remineralized + iontophoresis group was also divided into three subgroups—subgroup A1 = CPP-ACP + iontophoresis (n = 15), subgroup B1 = GSE + iontophoresis (n = 15), and subgroup C1 = NovaMin + iontophoresis (n = 15). Vickers microhardness test was used to measure the changes in the hardness of enamel, which occurred in three phases (i.e., control, after demineralization, and after treatment). Data was recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: The mean microhardness for the control group was highest (359.72 kg/mm2 ± 15.3), while the demineralized group had the lowest value (294.2 kg/mm2 ± 16.3), which was statistically significant. Among the remineralizing agents, results were nonsignificant; however, CPP-ACP (330.4 ± 11.3 kg/mm2) had shown the highest mean microhardness values. On intragroup comparison, data was statistically significant for each group, with an increase in microhardness values in the remineralized + iontophoresis group compared to using remineralizing agent alone. Conclusion: Mean microhardness values in descending order—control group > remineralized + iontophoresis group > remineralized group > demineralized group. CPP-ACP application, along with iontophoresis, had superior remineralizing efficiency compared to other groups. Clinical significance: A pivotal goal of modern dentistry is to manage the noncavitated lesions noninvasively through the remineralization process in order to prevent disease progression and to improve esthetics, strength, and function. Iontophoresis has been shown to effectively accelerate the remineralization speed by driving the remineralizing agents deep into the subsurface enamel lesion in less time, leading to optimal enamel surface hardness.


PDF Share
  1. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369(9555):51–59. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2
  2. Hegde S, Roma M, Shetty D. Non-fluoridated remineralization agents in dentistry. J Pharm Sci Res 2016;8(8):884–887. Available from: https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/vol8Issue08/jpsr08081644.pdf
  3. Rao A, Malhotra N. The role of remineralizing agents in dentistry: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32(6):27–34. PMID: 21894873.
  4. Bishara SE, Ostby AW. White spot lesions: formation, prevention, and treatment. In Semin Orthod 2008;14(3):174–182. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.002
  5. Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Huq NL, et al. New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. J Dent Res 2010;89(11):1187–1197. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510376046
  6. Philip N. State of the art enamel remineralization systems: the next frontier in caries management. Caries Res 2019;53(3):284–295. DOI: 10.1159/000493031
  7. Naveena Preethi P, Nagarathana C, Sakunthala BK. Remineralizing agent then and now - an update. Dent 2014;4(9):256–261. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7633.1000256
  8. Mirkarimi M, Eskandarion S, Bargrizan M, et al. Remineralization of artificial caries in primary teeth by grape seed extract: an in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2013;7(4):206–210. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2013.033
  9. Shihabi S, AlNesser S, Comisi JC. Comparative remineralization efficacy of topical novamin and fluoride on incipient enamel lesions in primary teeth: scanning electron microscope and Vickers microhardness evaluation. Eur J Dent 2020;15(3):420–424. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721311
  10. Deswal R, Kukreja N, Chhabra S, et al. Comparative assessment of enamel microhardness using various remineralising agents on artificially demineralized human enamel. Cureus 2022;14(10):e30281. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30281
  11. Nobahar S, Mirzaeei S, Simaei L, et al. Comparative study of the effect of flavonoids and the whey extract on enamel microhardness: an in vitro study. Avicenna J Dent Res 2020;12(3):81–85. DOI: 10.34172/ajdr.2020.17
  12. Mehta AB, Kumari V, Jose R, et al. Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: an in-vitro pH-cycling study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(1):3–7. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.124085
  13. Thakur S, Devadiga D, Hegde NM. Comparative evaluation of the effect of various remineralizing agents on bleached enamel surface: an in vitro study. J Pharm Sci Innov 2016;4(6):324–328. DOI: 10.7897/2277-4572.04671
  14. Rai PM, Devadiga D, Jain J, et al. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the novel remineralizing agents’ effects on enamel surface hardness. J Int Dent Med Res 2019;12(2):454–459. Available from: http://www.jidmr.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/14_19100-ED-2-OK_layout.pdf
  15. Wilson JM, Fry BW, Walton RE, et al. Fluoride levels in dentin after iontophoresis of 2% NaF. J Dent Res 1984;63(6):897–900. DOI: 10.1177/00220345840630061701
  16. Zhang YY, Wong HM, McGrath CP, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of electrophoresis-aided casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate remineralisation system on pH-cycling and acid-etching demineralised enamel. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):8904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27304-5
  17. Yanko N. Agents used for enamel remineralisation and reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a comprehensive review. Med Ecol Probl 2020;24(1-2):30–35. DOI: 10.31718/mep.2020.24.1-2.07
  18. Elqady HIMI. Effect of desensitizing OTC toothpaste products versus fluoride iontophoresis on microhardness of dentin surface. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2021;24(2):133–140. DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.58072.1147
  19. Pakanati S, Gone PH, Pratap SNVG, et al. Efficacy of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and grape seed extract (GSE) on enamel remineralization. An in vitro study. Br J Pharm Med Res 2019;4(3):1810–1820. DOI: 10.24942/bjpmr.2019.512
  20. Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, et al. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of a paste containing bioactive glass and a topical cream containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: an in vitro study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatr Clin Integr 2019;19:e4668–e4675. DOI: 10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.61
  21. Khamverdi Z, Kordestani M, Soltanian AR. Effect of proanthocyanidin, fluoride and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate remineralizing agents on microhardness of demineralized dentin. J Dent (Tehran) 2017;14(2):76–83. PMID: 29104598.
  22. Rubel M, Prashhant G, Naveen K, et al. Effect of grape seed extract on remineralization of artificial caries: an in vitro study. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2016;9(5):174–176. DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i5.13175
  23. Reynolds EC. Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: the scientific evidence. J Adv Dent Res 2009;21(1):25–29. DOI: 10.1177/0895937409335619
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.