World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  16 (2025)
Volume  15 (2024)
Volume  14 (2023)
Volume  13 (2022)
Volume  12 (2021)
Volume  11 (2020)
Volume  10 (2019)
Volume  9 (2018)
Volume  8 (2017)
Volume  7 (2016)
Volume  6 (2015)
Volume  5 (2014)
Volume  4 (2013)
Volume  3 (2012)
Volume  2 (2011)
Volume  1 (2010)
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Adhesives to Enamel: An In Vitro Study

Geeta Hiremath, Shreshtha Pramanik, Priya Horatti

Keywords : Bonding agents, Bond strength etchant, G-CEM resin cement

Citation Information : Hiremath G, Pramanik S, Horatti P. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Adhesives to Enamel: An In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2024; 15 (3):235-239.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2396

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-04-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a newly introduced self-adhesive resin cement, G-CEM ONE (GC Corporation, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan), and compare it with Maxcem Elite (Kerr Corporation, Orange, California, United States of America), to enamel—an in vitro study. Materials and methods: Cylindrical-shaped cement specimens (diameter, 2 mm; height, 3 mm) were bonded to etched buccal surface and nonetched lingual surface enamel of 40 caries-free premolars. Test specimens were stored in distilled water for 1 week. The test specimens were subjected to SBS using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Statistical analysis: Data (n = 20 per group) were statistically analyzed using the Mann–Whitney and Shapiro–Wilk test at the 0.05 level of significance. The bond strength [megapascals (MPa)] of G-CEM ONE (GC) was statistically higher than Maxcem Elite (Kerr). Results: The SBS of the G-CEM ONE (GC) group to enamel is better than the Maxcem Elite (Kerr) group. Clinical significance: This study helps in following the proper protocol for the success of adhesive restorations.

PDF Share
  1. Christensen GJ. Bonding to dentin and enamel: where does it stand in 2005? J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(9):1299–1302. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0348
  2. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 2006;76(1):123–126. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0123:COSBSO]2.0.CO;2
  3. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, et al. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9(3):161–167. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5
  4. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, et al. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mate J 2007;26(6):906–914. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.906
  5. Malik SA, Laxmikanth SM. Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength and de-bonding properties of self-etch adhesive composite cement (Maxcem Elite Chroma) vs. self-etching primer composite system (Transbond Plus Sep, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) used for orthodontic bracket bonding. Dentist 2019;1(1):1007.
  6. Lajarin LP, Garcia-Ballesta C, Cortes-Lillo O, et al. An evaluation of the bond strengths to enamel of two fissure sealants. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;24(4):287–290. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.24.4.f867h330272473pq
  7. Hattar S, Hatamleh MM, Sawair F, et al. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to tooth structure. Saudi Dent J 2015;27(2):70–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.006
  8. Garcia-Godoy F, Dodge WW, Donohue M, et al. Composite resin bond strength after enamel bleaching. Oper Dent 1993;18(4):144–144. PMID: 8152982.
  9. Garcia RN, Alvarez AEG, Dias CE, et al. Bond strength of contemporary restorative systems to enamel and dentin. RSBO Online 2011;8(1):60–67.
  10. Wang L, Xu H, Li S, et al. Bonding efficacy of a self-adhesive resin cement to enamel and dentin. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mater Sci Ed 2014;29(6):1307–1312. DOI: 10.1007/s11595-014-1086-1
  11. https://www.gcdental.co.jp/sys/data/item/1573/
  12. Salz U, Mücke A, Zimmermann J, et al. pKa value and buffering capacity of acidic monomers commonly used in self-etching primers. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(3):143–150. PMID: 16830660.
  13. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, et al. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000;13:25D–30D. PMID: 11763914.
  14. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21(10):895–910. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001
  15. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:20S–25S. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  16. Söderholm KJ, Soares F, Argumosa M, et al. Shear bond strength of one etch-and-rinse and five self-etching dental adhesives when used by six operators. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66(4):243–249. DOI: 10.1080/00016350802220088
  17. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):17–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
  18. Yoshioka M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Adhesion/decalcification mechanisms of acid interactions with human hard tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59(1):56–62. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.1216
  19. Lee SE, Bae JH, Choi JW, et al. Comparative shear-bond strength of six dental self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia. Materials 2015;8(6):3306–3315. DOI: 10.3390/ma8063306
  20. Sabatini C, Patel M, D’Silva E. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates. Operat Dent 2013;38(2):186–196. DOI: 10.2341/11-317-L
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.