World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Castings Using Conventional and Accelerated Casting Technique with Different Pattern Materials: An In Vitro Study

Sujeet Patil, Akash Gopi, Shalabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Gyan Abhishek, Chandan Kumar

Keywords : Accelerated casting, Casting, Inlay wax, Marginal discrepancy, Pattern resin

Citation Information : Patil S, Gopi A, Kumar S, Gupta A, Abhishek G, Kumar C. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Castings Using Conventional and Accelerated Casting Technique with Different Pattern Materials: An In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2023; 14 (8):700-704.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2258

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the marginal fit of casting made by conventional and accelerated casting techniques using inlay wax and pattern resin. Materials and methods: A total of 40 cobalt-chromium copings were fabricated on typodont tooth using two types of pattern materials and two different casting techniques and divided into two groups of pattern resin and inlay wax with 20 copings each and two subgroups of conventional and accelerated casting technique with 10 copings each. A marginal gap of copings was examined under a stereomicroscope, and collected data were statistically analyzed. Result: Mean gap in inlay wax castings made using the traditional casting process was 258 µm, whereas the marginal gap in inlay wax castings made using the accelerated casting technique was 300.3 µm. The castings created with autopolymerizing pattern resin using conventional and accelerated casting procedures had maximum mean gaps of 358.4 and 392.5 µm, respectively. Conclusion: Within the constraints of this investigation, all castings fall within a range of clinical acceptability. Inlay wax is a better material than autopolymerizing pattern resin for pattern fabrication, and the conventional casting technique has the least vertical marginal discrepancy when compared to the accelerated casting technique. Clinical significance: Traditional casting methods that adhere to manufacturer instructions take a lot of time. Although documented, the accuracy of accelerated casting procedures using base metal alloys has not been sufficiently investigated. Also, there are very few studies to compare two pattern materials; inlay wax and pattern resin.


PDF Share
  1. Rajagopal P, Chitre V, Aras MA. A comparison of the accuracy of patterns processed from an inlay casting wax, an auto-polymerized resin and a light-cured resin pattern material. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23(2):152–156. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.100418
  2. Konstantoulakis E, Nakajima H, Woody RD, et al. Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):337–345. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70135-0
  3. Rosensteil S, Land M, Fulimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2007.
  4. Asgar K. Casting metals in dentistry: past-present-future. Adv Dent Res 1988;2(1):33–43. DOI: 10.1177/08959374880020011701
  5. Vaidya S, Parkash H, Bhargava A, et al. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated on three different marginal designs using conventional and accelerated casting techniques: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(5):641–647. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.147114
  6. Alex D, Shetty YB, Miranda GA, et al. Marginal accuracy of nickel chromium copings fabricated by conventional and accelerated casting procedures, produced with ringless and metal ring investment procedures: a comparative in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15(1):58–64. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.155043
  7. Parithimarkalaignan S, Hegde V. Evaluation of marginal gap of Ni-Cr-based base metal alloys invested in phosphate-bonded investment with the use of conventional and accelerated casting techniques—an in vitro study. Indian J Dent 2011;2(3):76–80. DOI: 10.1016/S0975-962X(11)60019-1
  8. Kalaignan PS, ShanmugaNathan N, Peeran SA. Evaluation of marginal gap of Ni-Cr based base metal alloys and the clinical acceptability of single casting invested in phosphate bonded investment with the use of conventional and accelerated casting techniques an in –vitro study. Sebha Med J 2008;7(2):13–20.
  9. Sushma R, Farias A, Soni R. Vertical marginal discrepancies of metal castings obtained using different pattern materials: a scanning electron microscope study. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2014;6(2):98–102. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0754.143492
  10. Malhotra S, Kumar S, Kaur D, et al. Comparative evaluation of marginal discrepancy of castings made with conventional and accelerated casting technique using two types of pattern materials. J Med Dent Sci 2018;5(1):11–17.
  11. Marzouk MA, Kerby J. The exothermic casting procedure: a comparative study of four thermal treatments. Chicago: Quintessence Yearbook. 1988:177–85.
  12. Campagni WV, Majchrovicz M. An accelerated casting technique for casting post and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66(2):155–156. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80040-x
  13. Bailey JH, Sherrad DJ. Post and core assemblies made with accelerated pattern elimination technique. J Prosthodont 1994;3(1):47–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1994.tb00125.x
  14. Schilling ER, Miller BH, Woody RD, et al. Marginal gap of crowns made with a phosphate bonded investment and accelerated casting method. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):129–134. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70239-8
  15. Phillips RW, Biggs DH. Distortion of wax patterns as influenced by storage time, storage temperature, and temperature of wax manipulation. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41(1):28–37. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1950.0145
  16. Lasater RL. Control of wax distortion by manipulation. J Am Dent Assoc 1940;27(4):518–524. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1940.0159
  17. Iglesias A, Powers JM, Pierpont HP. Accuracy of wax, autopolymerized, and light cured resin pattern materials. J Prosthodont 1996;5(3):201–205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00297.x
  18. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62(4):405–408. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  19. Boeckler AF, Stadler A, Setz JM. The significance of marginal gap and over extension measurement in the evaluation of the fit of complete crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6(4):26–37.
  20. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whittsett LD, et al. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publication; 1997. p. 365–383
  21. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, et al. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(1):26–31. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-j
  22. Quintas AF, Oliveria F, Bottia MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines and luting agents- an in-vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(3):250–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.023
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.