World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Assessment of Occlusal Contacts Following Bi-jaw Orthognathic Surgery Using T-scan: A Prospective Clinical Study

Vikram Shetty, Subhajit Das, Tripthi P Shetty, Ganaraj Shetty

Keywords : Bite force, Masticatory efficiency, Occlusion, Orthognathic surgery

Citation Information : Shetty V, Das S, Shetty TP, Shetty G. Assessment of Occlusal Contacts Following Bi-jaw Orthognathic Surgery Using T-scan: A Prospective Clinical Study. World J Dent 2023; 14 (7):625-628.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2257

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of the study was to assess occlusion in patients undergoing bi-jaw orthognathic surgeries (OGS). Materials and methods: A prospective study was done on 20 patients between the age-group of 18 and 32 years having skeletal malocclusions requiring bi-jaw OGS. The occlusal contacts of patients undergoing bi-jaw OGS were assessed in two phases using a T-scan device—(1) immediately prior to surgery and (2) after 3 months of orthognathic surgery. Patients were made to sit in a natural position with Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the ground, occlusal contacts were recorded using specialized wafers, and information was recorded digitally using a T-scan device. Results: The study included 20 patients (7 males and 13 females) with a mean age of 22.7 years. The mean number of teeth in contact increased from 2.7 to 3.3 on the left side and 3.3 to 3.7 on the right side when assessed 3 months postoperatively indicating a significant improvement in postoperative occlusal contacts. Conclusion: The significant increase in the occlusal contacts over the left and right side postoperatively implies a better stomatognathic system and improved masticatory efficiency postorthognathic surgery. Clinical significance: Orthognathic surgery has been routinely performed to enhance the patient's facial esthetics, thus the concept of functional occlusion is sometimes forgotten. This study helps in assessing the functional aspect of orthognathic surgery in terms of occlusal contacts which is a keystone in a successful orthognathic surgery.

PDF Share
  1. Nalini MS, Sinha M. Role of T-scan in digital occlusal analysis – a review. IJRRD 2018;1(2):1–7. DOI: 10.9734/IJRRD/2018/v1i230092
  2. Agbaje JO, Casteele EV, Salem AS, et al. Assessment of occlusion with the T-Scan system in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):5356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05788-x
  3. Wieczorek A, Loster J, Loster BW. Relationship between occlusal force distribution and the activity of masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in asymptomatic young adults. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:354017. DOI: 10.1155/2013/354017
  4. Kerstein RB, Farrell S. Treatment of myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome with occlusal equilibration. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(6): 695–700. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90328-a
  5. Sathyanarayana HP, Premkumar S, Manjula WS. Assessment of maximum voluntary bite force in adults with normal occlusion and different types of malocclusions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(4):534–538. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1181
  6. Khechoyan DY. Orthognathic surgery: general considerations. Semin Plast Surg 2013;27(3):133–136. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357109
  7. Iwase M, Ohashi M, Tachibana H, et al. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35(12):1102–1107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.08.014
  8. Baan F, van Meggelen EM, Verhulst AC, et al. Virtual occlusion in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;50(9):1219–1225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.12.006
  9. Majithia IP, Arora V, Anil Kumar S, et al. Comparison of articulating paper markings and T Scan III recordings to evaluate occlusal force in normal and rehabilitated maxillofacial trauma patients. Med J Armed Forces India 2015;71(Suppl 2):S382–S388. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.09.014
  10. Garrido García VC, García Cartagena A, González Sequeros O. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24(12):899–903. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00586.x
  11. Garg AK. Analyzing dental occlusion for implants: Tekscan's TScan III. Dent Implantol Update 2007;18(9):65–70.
  12. Trpevska V, Kovacevska G, Benedeti A, et al. T-scan III system diagnostic tool for digital occlusal analysis in orthodontics - a modern approach. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki) 2014;35(2):155–160. DOI: 10.2478/prilozi-2014-0020
  13. Sonnesen L, Bakke M. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(1):58–63. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjh069
  14. Ahlgren J. Pattern of chewing and malocclusion of teeth. A clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1967;25(1):3–13. DOI: 10.3109/00016356709072519
  15. Roldán SI, Restrepo LG, Isaza JF, et al. Are maximum bite forces of subjects 7 to 17 years of age related to malocclusion? Angle Orthod 2016;86(3):456–461. DOI: 10.2319/051315-323.1
  16. Alam MK, Alfawzan AA. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with malocclusion: multifactor analysis. J Int Med Res 2020;48(10):300060520962943. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520962943
  17. Khadka A, Liu Y, Li J, et al. Changes in quality of life after orthognathic surgery: a comparison based on the involvement of the occlusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112(6):719–725. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.002
  18. Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, et al. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4(1):7–12. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7
  19. Hejne AJ. The influence of occlusal interferences on pulp vitality threshold in permanent dentition. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2003;49: 277–289.
  20. Brennan DS, Spencer AJ, Roberts-Thomson KF. Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Qual Life Res 2008;17(2):227–235. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9293-2
  21. Henrikson T, Ekberg E, Nilner M. Can orthodontic treatment improve mastication? A controlled, prospective and longitudinal study. Swed Dent J 2009;33(2):59–65.
  22. Bakke M. Bite force and occlusion. Semin Orthod 2006;12(2):120–126. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.01.005
  23. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, et al. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5(1):63–68. DOI: 10.1007/s007840000099
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.