World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of Condylar Position in Treated Unilateral Unfavorable Mandibular Angle Fracture After 1-year Follow-up: A Prospective Study

Kathirvel Gopalakrishnan, Reena R John, Balamanikandasrinivasan Chandrasekaran

Keywords : Computed tomography analysis, Condyle position, Helkimo dysfunction index, Mandibular angle fracture, Unfavorable fracture

Citation Information : Gopalakrishnan K, John RR, Chandrasekaran B. Assessment of Condylar Position in Treated Unilateral Unfavorable Mandibular Angle Fracture After 1-year Follow-up: A Prospective Study. World J Dent 2023; 14 (6):503-509.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2254

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-08-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To assess the function and three-dimensional position of the condyle in unilateral horizontally unfavorable mandibular angle fracture preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively using the Helkimo clinical dysfunction index and computed tomography (CT), respectively. Materials and methods: A total of 10 patients with unilateral horizontal unfavorable angle fractures were subjected to clinical and radiographic assessment before and 1-year after surgical management. The position of the condyle was evaluated through CT and compared between the following groups—group I, preoperative fractured vs nonfractured side; group II, postoperative fractured vs nonfractured side; group III, preoperative vs postoperative fractured side. Statistical analysis was done with the Chi-square and paired student t-test. Results: Clinical evaluation showed severe dysfunction in 80% of patients preoperatively and showed no dysfunction in 80% of patients postoperatively (p = 0.001). CT evaluation in groups I and III showed changes in superior joint space (S1) and condylar angulation (CA) which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study has given insight into the potential long-term changes in the position and function of the condyle in unilateral unfavorable angle fractures. Though CT evaluation showed changes, its implications in terms of clinical symptoms were minimal. Clinical significance: From this study, it is understood that angle fracture influences condylar position in the sagittal and axial plane. Operating surgeons should remember that in a continuous bone-like mandible, a fracture of one part can impact the other. Therefore, appropriate fixation of angle fracture following protocols is paramount to avoid long-term Tempero Mandibular Joint (TMJ) dysfunction.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Koshy JC, Feldman EM, Chike-Obi CJ, et al. Pearls of mandibular trauma management. Semin Plast Surg 2010;24(4):357–374. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1269765
  2. Abotaleb BM, Al-Moraissi EA, Zhiqiang W, et al. A detailed analysis of mandibular fractures epidemiology, treatment and outcomes: a 5-year retrospective study, Gansu Province-China. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;30(3):197–205. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87820-9
  3. Braasch DC, Abubaker AO. Management of mandibular angle fracture. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013;25(4):591–600. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.07.007
  4. Perez R, Oeltjen JC, Thaller SR. A review of mandibular angle fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2011;4(2):69–72. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272903
  5. Munante-Cardenas JL, Facchina Nunes PH, Passeri LA. Etiology, treatment, and complications of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(3):611–615. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001273
  6. Lee JH. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg 2017;18(2):73–75. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2017.18.2.73
  7. Imai T, Sukegawa S, Kanno T, et al. Mandibular fracture patterns consistent with posterior maxillary fractures involving the posterior maxillary sinus, pterygoid plate or both: CT characteristics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43(2):20130355. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130355
  8. Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis E 3rd. What method for management of unilateral mandibular angle fractures has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72(11):2197–2211. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.023
  9. Suhas S, Ramdas S. Assessment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in condylar fracture of the mandible using the Helkimo index. Indian J Plast Surg 2017;50(2):207–212. DOI: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_125_16
  10. Choi BH, Huh JY, Yoo JH. Computed tomographic findings of the fractured mandibular condyle after open reduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32(5):469–473. DOI: 10.1016/S0901-5027(03)90427-9
  11. Shaffer SM, Brismée JM, Sizer PS, et al. Temporomandibular disorders. Part 1: anatomy and examination/diagnosis. J Man Manip Ther 2014;22(1):2–12. DOI: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000060
  12. Devireddy SK, Kumar RV, Gali R, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of unilateral subcondylar fracture using computed tomography after open reduction. Indian J Plast Surg 2014;47(2):203–209. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.138945
  13. Choi BH. Comparison of computed tomography imaging before and after functional treatment of bilateral condylar fractures in adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25(1):30–33. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80008-7
  14. Rajantie H, Snäll J, Thorén H. Temporomandibular dysfunction after surgery of mandibular fractures not involving the mandibular condyle: a prospective follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77(8):1657–1662. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.034
  15. Kumar S. Assessment of TMJ dysfunction in condylar fracture of the mandible using the Helkimo index: an observational study. Int J Med Biomed Stud 2020;4(7):241–243. DOI: 10.32553/ijmbs.v4i7.15226
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.