World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride vs High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement for Management of Dentinal Caries in Primary Molars

Parika Vaid, Shikha Dogra, Shourya Tandon, Ranu Rai

Keywords : Deciduous teeth, Dentin caries, Glass ionomer cement, Silver diamine fluoride

Citation Information : Vaid P, Dogra S, Tandon S, Rai R. Evaluation of 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride vs High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement for Management of Dentinal Caries in Primary Molars. World J Dent 2023; 14 (6):486-491.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2250

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-08-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To compare the effect of sealing dentinal caries [International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) codes 4 and 5] by high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in primary molars over a period of 6 months. Materials and method: This study was conducted over a period of 6 months and included 50 primary molars with active dentinal occlusal lesions, aged 3–5 years, having ICDAS codes 4 and 5. Children were randomly assigned to group I: SDF application (n = 27) or group II: high viscosity GIC treatment (n = 23). Lesions were assessed clinically for any progression of caries extent by using International Caries Diagnosis and Assessment System II, topography of lesion and radiographically by International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) criteria after 6 months of intervention compared to baseline. Further, the evaluation of SDF-treated lesion status was by lesion texture and GIC restoration status was evaluated by caries-associated restorations and sealants (CARS) criteria. Results: After 6 months evaluation period, statistically significant, less progression of cases was observed in 7% of lesions after SDF application as compared to 39% in high-viscosity GIC group. Chairside time was statistically significant in between both the groups (p-value = 0.039). Conclusion: Techniques with minimal intervention, namely 38% SDF and high viscosity GIC for the occlusal surface cavity, appear to be effective in arresting the progress of dentinal caries in primary teeth. Clinical significance: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application stops the progression of dentinal lesions with less chairside time, being economical and can be used in patients of uncooperative behavior, including those with special healthcare needs.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Dorri M, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Walsh T, et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;12(12):CD008072. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2
  2. Torres PJ, Phan HT, Bojorquez AK, et al. Minimally invasive techniques used for caries management in dentistry. A review. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;45(4):224–232. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.4.2
  3. BaniHani A, Santamaría RM, Hu S, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2022;23(5):667–693. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-021-00675-6
  4. Gruythuysen RJ. [Non-restorative cavity treatment. Managing rather than masking caries activity]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2010;117(3):173–180. DOI: 10.5177/ntvt2010.03.09176
  5. Urquhart O, Tampi MP, Pilcher L, et al. Nonrestorative treatments for caries: systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2019;98(1):14–26. DOI: 10.1177/0022034518800014
  6. Duangthip D, Jiang M, Chu CH, et al. Non-surgical treatment of dentin caries in preschool children–systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:44. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-015-0033-7
  7. Cleary J, Al-Hadidi R, Scully A, et al. A 12-month randomized clinical trial of 38% SDF vs. restorative treatment. JDR Clin Trans Res 2022;7(2):135–144. DOI: 10.1177/23800844211072741
  8. Schroth RJ, Quiñonez C, Shwart L, et al. Treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia: a national review of Canadian data. J Can Dent Assoc 2016;82:g20.
  9. Eid SA, Khattab NMA, Elheeny AAH. Untreated dental caries prevalence and impact on the quality of life among 11 to14-year-old Egyptian schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):83. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01077-8
  10. Santamaría RM, Abudrya MH, Gül G, et al. How to intervene in the caries process: dentin caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 2020;54(4):306–323. DOI: 10.1159/000508899
  11. Giacaman RA, Muñoz-Sandoval C, Neuhaus KW, et al. Evidence-based strategies for the minimally invasive treatment of carious lesions: review of the literature. Adv Clin Exp Med 2018;27(7):1009–1016. DOI: 10.17219/acem/77022
  12. van Strijp G, van Loveren C. No removal and inactivation of carious tissue: non-restorative cavity control. In Caries Excavation: Evolution of Treating Cavitated Carious Lesions 2018;27,124–136. Karger Publishers
  13. Crystal YO, Niederman R. Evidence-Based Dentistry Update on Silver Diamine Fluoride. Dent Clin North Am 2019;63(1):45–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.08.011
  14. Punhagui MF, Jussiani EI, Andrello AC, et al. Effect of application time and concentration of silver diamine fluoride on the enamel remineralization. J Clin Exp Dent 2021;13(7):e653–e658. DOI: 10.4317/jced.58318
  15. Fung MHT, Duangthip D, Wong MCM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of 12% and 38% silver diamine fluoride treatment. J Dent Res 2018;97(2):171–178. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517728496
  16. Yan IG, Zheng FM, Gao SS, et al. Ion concentration of silver diamine fluoride solutions. Int Dent J 2022;72(6):779–784. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.04.005
  17. Saber AM, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM. Atraumatic restorative treatment and interim therapeutic restoration: a review of the literature. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7(1): DOI: 10.3390/dj7010028
  18. Yunus GY, Sharma H, Itagi ABH, et al. A comparative survival analysis of high viscosity glass ionomer restorations using conventional cavity preparation and atraumatic restorative treatment technique in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021;18:95. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.330876
  19. Dikmen B. Icdas II criteria (international caries detection and assessment system). J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2015;49(3):63–72. DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.38691
  20. Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M, et al. The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) an example of a caries management pathway. BMC Oral Health 2015;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S9
  21. Crystal YO, Marghalani AA, Ureles SD, et al. Use of silver diamine fluoride for dental caries management in children and adolescents, including those with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(5):135–145. PMID: 29179353.
  22. de Amorim, Frencken JE, Raggio DP. et al. Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest 2018;22:2703–2725. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018 -2625-5
  23. Desai H, Stewart CA, Finer Y. Minimally invasive therapies for the management of dental caries-a literature review. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9(12): DOI: 10.3390/dj9120147
  24. Singh N, Dubey N, Rathore M, et al. Impact of early childhood caries on quality of life: child and parent perspectives. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10(2):83–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.02.006
  25. Li T, Zhai X, Song F, et al. Selective versus non-selective removal for dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76(2):135–140. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1392602
  26. Antonioni MB, Fontana M, Salzmann LB, et al. Pediatric dentists’ silver diamine fluoride education, knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior: a national survey. J Dent Educ 2019;83(2):173–182. DOI: 10.21815/JDE.019.020
  27. Wakhloo T, Reddy SG, Sharma SK, et al. Silver diamine fluoride versus atraumatic restorative treatment in pediatric dental caries management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2021;11(4):367–375. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_83_21
  28. Schwendicke F, Walsh T, Lamont T, et al. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;7(7):CD013039. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2
  29. Duangthip D, Chu CH, Lo EC. A randomized clinical trial on arresting dentine caries in preschool children by topical fluorides–18 month results. J Dent 2016;44:57–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.006
  30. Jiang CM, Wong MCM, Chu CH, et al. Changes in parental satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life of preschool children after receiving atraumatic restorative treatment with or without prior silver diamine fluoride application. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2022;22(3):101751. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101751
  31. Mabangkhru S, Duangthip D, Chu CH, et al. A randomized clinical trial to arrest dentin caries in young children using silver diamine fluoride. J Dent 2020;99:103375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103375
  32. Abdellatif HM, Ali AM, Baghdady SI, et al. Caries arrest effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride compared to alternative restorative technique: randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2021;22(4):575–585. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-020-00592-0
  33. Sharma M, Tuli A, Dhawan P, et al. Evaluation of effect of silver diamine fluoride in arresting dental caries using international caries classification and management system (ICCMS): an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(Suppl 2):S172–S175. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2146
  34. Surendranath P, Krishnappa S, Srinath S. Silver diamine fluoride in preventing caries: a review of current trends. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(Suppl 2):S247–S251. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2167
  35. Chikkanarasaiah N, Mounashree N, Krishnamurthy NH, et al. Effectiveness of various fluoride varnishes in arresting cavitated dentinal lesion in preschool children: a randomized clinical trial. World J Dent 2022;13(S2):S144–S148. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2156
  36. Gadekar SV, Panse AM, Jathar P, et al. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of type IX GIC to demineralized dentin in primary teeth with and without application of SDF: an in vitro study. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Den 2022;5(3):157–163. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3248
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.