Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Reda R, et al. Metallurgical tests in endodontics: a narrative review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022;9(1):30. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9010030
Zanza A, D'Angelo M, Reda R, et al. An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective—an overview. Bioengineering 2021;8(12):218. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8120218
Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, et al. Classification and cyclic fatigue evaluation of new kinematics for endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J 2019;45(2):154–162. DOI: 10.1111/aej.12294
Grande NM, Ahmed HM, Cohen S, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review-part I: historic perspectives and current applications. J Endod 2015;41(11):1778–1783. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.014
Plotino G, Ahmed HM, Grande NM, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review–part II: properties and effectiveness. J Endod 2015;41(12):1939–1950. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.018
Kyaw MS, Ebihara A, Kasuga Y, et al. Influence of rotational speed on torque/force generation and shaping ability during root canal instrumentation of extracted teeth with continuous rotation and optimum torque reverse motion. Int Endod J 2021;54(9):1614–1622. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13485
Çapar ID, Arslan H. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49(2):119–135. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12432
Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, et al. Comparison of torque, screw-in force, and shaping ability of glide path instruments in continuous rotation and optimum glide path motion. J Endod 2021;47(1):94–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.013
Seracchiani M, Reda R, Zanza A, et al. Mechanical performance and metallurgical characteristics of 5 different single-file reciprocating instruments: a comparative in vitro and laboratory study. J Endod 2022;48(8):1073–1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.009
Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? Int Endod J 2014;47(5):430–436. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12166
Kim JW, Ha JH, Cheung GS, et al. Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2014;40(10):1671–1675. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.002
Capar ID, Arslan H, Ertas H, et al. Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal retreatment instruments used with rotary or reciprocating adaptive motion in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2015;48(1):79–83. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12279
Simões LP, Dos Reis-Prado AH, Bueno CRE, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rotary and reciprocating kinematics for retreatment of curved root canals: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(2):e22. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e22
da Silveira MT, Batista SM, Mamede Veloso SR, et al. Effect of reciprocating and rotary systems on postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran Endod J 2021;16(1):1–16. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v16i1.27944
Pawar AM, Bhardwaj A, Zanza A, et al. Severity of post-operative pain after instrumentation of root canals by XP-endo and SAF full sequences compared to manual instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med 2022;11(23):7251. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237251
