World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Biotype and Recession in Smokers and Nonsmokers

Dipanjan Das, Nina Shenoy

Keywords : Colored periodontal probe, Gingival biotype, Gingival recession, Smokers

Citation Information : Das D, Shenoy N. Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Biotype and Recession in Smokers and Nonsmokers. World J Dent 2023; 14 (4):359-365.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2215

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 02-06-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare and determine the association between gingival biotype [gingival thickness (GT)] and recession in smokers and nonsmokers. Materials and methods: A total of 64 systemically healthy nonperiodontitis subjects aged between 20 and 35 years with gingival recession (GR) were included in this cross-sectional study and divided into two groups—smokers and nonsmokers as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for cigarette smoking. GT was assessed in the maxillary and mandibular teeth (premolar to premolar) using a colored periodontal probe (CPP) for the probe transparency method. Results were then subjected to statistical analysis. The Chi-squared test was used to assess the association between the habit of smoking and the gingival biotype and determine the association between the gingival biotype and GR. Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine the difference in quantitative data between smokers and nonsmokers. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Around 40.6% of smokers had thin gingival biotypes, 34.4% had medium, 15.6% had very thick, and 9.4% had thick biotypes. In the nonsmoking group, 40.6% of the nonsmokers (13 out of 32) were reported with medium gingival, 31.3% with thin, and 28.1 % with thick biotypes. A comparison of gingival biotypes in smokers and nonsmokers demonstrated a statistically significant association between the habit of smoking (smokers and nonsmokers) and the gingival biotype (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in mean GR among smokers (2.34 ± 0.94 mm) and nonsmokers (2.16 ± 1.08 mm) [(p > 0.05)]. No significant association was found between gingival biotype and GR in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that there exists a significant association between the habit of smoking and gingival biotypes. However, there was no significant association found between gingival biotypes and GR in both groups. Clinical significance: Assessment of gingival biotypes during routine dental procedures can help to predict how various biotypes would respond and enhance treatment outcomes for the recession in smokers and nonsmokers.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008;36(3):193–198. DOI: 10.1080/19424396.2008.12221481
  2. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969;13(1):87–102. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02947-0
  3. Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. Textbook of clinical periodontology. 1989;2:477–514.
  4. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(3):237–243.
  5. Shah HK, Sharma S, Shrestha S. Gingival biotype classification, assessment, and clinical Importance: a review. J Nepal Soc Periodontol Oral Implantol 2020;4(2):83–88. DOI: 10.3126/jnspoi.v4i2.34303
  6. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol 2018;89(Suppl 1):S204–S213. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671
  7. Rasperini G, Acunzo R, Cannalire P, et al. Influence of periodontal biotype on root surface exposure during orthodontic treatment: a preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35(5):665–675. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2239
  8. Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45(Suppl 20):S1–S8. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12935
  9. Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, et al. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession - An epidemiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19(6):671–675. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.156881
  10. Pradeep K, Rajababu P, Satyanarayana D, et al. Gingival recession: review and strategies in treatment of recession. Case Rep Dent 2012;2012:563421. DOI: 10.1155/2012/563421
  11. Danielsen B, Manji F, Nagelkerke N, et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on the transition dynamics in experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17(3):159–164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01080.x
  12. Sreedevi M, Ramesh A, Dwarakanath C. Periodontal status in smokers and nonsmokers: a clinical, microbiological, and histopathological study. Int J Dent 2012;2012:571590. DOI: 10.1155/2012/571590
  13. Gurunathan D, Thamaraiselvan M. Prevalence of gingival recession in smokers and non-smokers-a cross-sectional study. Drug Invention Today 2019;12(2):329–345. DOI: 10.26682/sjuod.2022.25.2.31
  14. Birlabose B, Jebaraj JC, Kannan AL, et al. Effect of nicotine on the thickness of gingiva: A pilot study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2020;12(Suppl 1):S168. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_50_20
  15. Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3):499–508.
  16. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR. Carranza's clinical periodontology 10th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier 2006:1075.
  17. O'leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43(1):38–42. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38
  18. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975;25(4):229–235.
  19. Cairo F, Pini-Prato GP. A technique to identify and reconstruct the cementoenamel junction level using combined periodontal and restorative treatment of gingival recession. A prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(6):573–581.
  20. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002;30(7):521–526. DOI: 10.1080/19424396.2002.12223300
  21. Bergström J, Persson L, Preber H. Influence of cigarette smoking on vascular reaction during experimental gingivitis. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96(1):34–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01405.x
  22. Marini MG, Greghi SL, Passanezi E, et al. Gingival recession: prevalence, extension and severity in adults. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:250–255. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000300017
  23. Vandana KL, Savitha B. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(7):828–830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00757.x
  24. Chang LC. Comparison of age and sex regarding gingival and papillary recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(5):555–561.
  25. Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV, et al. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 2004;75(10):1377–1386. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1377
  26. Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, et al. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol 2018;89(11):1300–1309. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0125
  27. Dietrich T, Bernimoulin JP, Glynn RJ. The effect of cigarette smoking on gingival bleeding. J Periodontol 2004;75(1):16–22. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.1.16
  28. Macgregor ID, Edgar WM, Greenwood AR. Effects of cigarette smoking on the rate of plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12(1):35–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1985.tb01351.x
  29. Torrungruang K, Nisapakultorn K, Sutdhibhisal S, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on the severity of periodontal disease among older Thai adults. J Periodontol 2005;76(4):566–572. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.566
  30. Agarwal V, Mehrotra N, Vijay V. Gingival biotype assessment: variations in gingival thickness with regard to age, gender, and arch location. Indian J Dent Sci 2017;9(1):12–15. DOI: 10.4103/0976-4003.201639
  31. Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodonto 2014;18(4):478–481. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.138699
  32. Taltia A, Arjunkumar R. Assessment of gingival thickness in smokers and non-smokers-A clinical study. Int J Pharm Clin Res 2016;8(6):574–577.
  33. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(5):428–433. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x
  34. Lee SA, Kim AC, Prusa LA Jr, et al. Characterization of dental anatomy and gingival biotype in Asian populations. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41(1):31–33. DOI: 10.1080/19424396.2013.12222276
  35. Venkatesh PM, Varadhan KB, Hadal K, et al. The influence of racio-ethnicity on gingival thickness in dravidian and mongoloid population- a pilot study. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2019;8(35):2708–2713. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2019/588
  36. Johnson GK, Guthmiller JM. The impact of cigarette smoking on periodontal disease and treatment. Periodontol 2000 2007;44(1):178–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00212.x
  37. Gunsolley JC, Quinn SM, Tew J, et al. The effect of smoking on individuals with minimal periodontal destruction. J Periodontol 1998;69(2):165–170. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.165
  38. Calsina G, Ramón JM, Echeverría JJ. Effects of smoking on periodontal tissues. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(8):771–776. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290815.x
  39. Albandar JM, Streckfus CF, Adesanya MR, et al. Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking as risk factors for periodontal disease and tooth loss. J Periodontol 2000;71(12):1874–1881. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1874
  40. Putri F, Lessang R, Soeroso Y. The difference in pocket depth and gingival recession between both smokers and non-smokers with chronic periodontitis. J Int Dent Medical Res 2018;11(3):1007–1010.
  41. Banihashemrad SA, Fatemi K, Najafi MH. Effect of smoking on gingival recession. J Dent Res 2009;5(1).
  42. Seong J, Bartlett D, Newcombe RG, et al. Prevalence of gingival recession and study of associated related factors in young UK adults. J Dent 2018;76:58–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.005
  43. Slutzkey S, Levin L. Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134(5):652–665. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.054
  44. Maroso FB, Gaio EJ, Rösing CK, et al. Correlation between gingival thickness and gingival recession in humans. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2015;28(2):162–166. DOI: 10.1590/S1852-48342015000200011
  45. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, et al. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27(9):621–626. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009621.x
  46. Vasishta PA, Gajendran PL, Murthykumar K, et al. Association between gingival recession and its biotype among South Indian population-a retrospective study. J Pharm Negat Results 2022;29:864–870. DOI: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S04.102
  47. Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. Journal of periodontology 2020;91(3):311–338. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0337
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.