World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Salivary Cathelicidins (LL-37) as a Dental Caries Biomarker in Relation to Nutrition Status among a Group of Adolescents

Sarah H Yousif, Alhan A Qasim

Keywords : Adolescents, Cathelicidins, Comparative study, Dental Caries, Nutrition

Citation Information : Yousif SH, Qasim AA. Salivary Cathelicidins (LL-37) as a Dental Caries Biomarker in Relation to Nutrition Status among a Group of Adolescents. World J Dent 2023; 14 (4):352-358.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2223

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 02-06-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The study investigated salivary cathelicidins (LL-37) as a biomarker for dental caries in relation to nutritional status among a sample of adolescents. Materials and methods: The current study is an observational (comparative study) with (90) 15-year-old male and female adolescents. The participants were split into two groups—60 who had previously suffered from caries (the study group) and 30 who had not (the control group). Adolescents with various caries experiences were divided into two groups, according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines from 2013. A total of 30 had moderate (1_3) carious teeth and 30 had severe (DT >10) carious teeth. To quantify caries experience, the decayed, missing, and filled (DMFT) index was used. An unstimulated salivary sample was collected for analysis of cathelicidins, salivary flow rate (SFR), and salivary pH. Assessment of nutritional status by measurement of weight and height and using body mass index (BMI). Adolescents were classified as healthy, at risk of being overweight, or overweight based on their BMI. Results: Salivary cathelicidin levels decrease with caries severity and are significantly different in healthy weight groups and the entire sample. It increased within nutritional status and differed significantly within the severe caries group and the overall sample. Salivary cathelicidin has a weekly negative but not significant correlation with salivary pH and flow rate in nutritional status and caries severity groups, except in the mild caries group where it is strongly negatively correlated with SFR, and with the exception of the healthy weight group with SFR, the risk overweight group, and the overweight group with salivary pH. Conclusion: Salivary cathelicidin protects against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, hence its level decreases with caries severity. Nutritional status enhances salivary cathelicidin, especially in severe caries. Nutrition and dental caries affect salivary cathelicidin levels. Clinical significance: A substantial percentage of adolescents in Baghdad had severe caries teeth. To improve teenage oral health, public health dentists should create and implement prevention programs. Nutritional status is linked to dental caries. Thus, community-wide initiatives can prevent dental caries and obesity. To prevent dental cavities and obesity, promote healthy eating habits.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17030. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.30
  2. Al-Moosawi RIK, Qasim AA. The impact of dental environment stress on dentition status, salivary nitric oxide and flow rate. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020;10(2):163–170. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_427_19
  3. Jaddoa MF, Qasim AA. Assessment of the correlation between the salivary flow rate and dental caries experience among children with β-thalassemia major. Indian J Med Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14(1):1122–1127. DOI: 10.37506/v14/i1/2020/ijfmt/193058
  4. Diah J, Diab BS. Dental caries, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and salivary status of type 1 diabetic mellitus patients aged 18-22 years in relation to glycated haemoglobin. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2013;25(1):153–158. DOI: 10.12816/0014979
  5. Conrads G, About I. Pathophysiology of dental caries. Monogr Oral Sci 2018;27:1–10. DOI: 10.1159/000487826
  6. Al-Anbori DKA, Al-Nimer MSM, Al-Weheb AM. Antibacterial activity of ethanolic extract of Myrtus communis. L leaves against salivary Mutans streptococci. Saudi Dent J 2008;20(3):82–87.
  7. Majid AY, Diab BS, Alsaadi AAA. Caries experience and salivary constituents among overweight children aged 6-11 years in Baghdad, Iraq. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2010;22(2):75–80.
  8. Mahdi M, Haidar A. Evaluation of the efficacy of caries removal using papain gel (Brix 3000) and smart preparation bur (in vivo comparative study). J Pharm Sci Res 2019;11(2):444–449.
  9. Aziz AR, Taha A. The salivary inflammatory biomarkers (Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein) in relation with caries-experience among a group of 12 year old obese boys. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2016;28(1):138–142. DOI: 10.12816/0024723
  10. Flayyih AS, Hassani HH, Wali MH. Identification of Streptococcus mutans from human dental plaque and dental caries using 16srrna gene. Iraqi J Sci 2016;552–557.
  11. Guracho TT, Atomssa EM, Megersa OA, et al. Determinants of dental caries among adolescent patients attending hospitals in West Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia: a case-control study. PLoS One 2021;16(12):e0260427. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260427
  12. Kazeminia M, Abdi A, Shohaimi S, et al. Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children's worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med 2020;16(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-020-00237-z
  13. Arain M, Haque M, Johal L, et al. Maturation of the adolescent brain. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013;9:449–461. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S39776
  14. World Health Organization. Sugars and dental caries. World Health Organization; 2017.
  15. Kazeminia M, Abdi A, Shohaimi S, et al. Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children's worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med 2020;16(1):22. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-020-00237-z
  16. Ndagire B, Kutesa A, Ssenyonga R, et al. Prevalence, severity and factors associated with dental caries among school adolescents in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Braz Dent J 2020;31(2):171–178. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202002841
  17. Pflipsen M, Zenchenko Y. Nutrition for oral health and oral manifestations of poor nutrition and unhealthy habits. Gen Dent 2017;65(6):36–43.
  18. Mohammed J, Haidar A. Association of enamel defects with nutritional status among primary schools students in Al-Najaf city. Int Med J 2021;28:46–48.
  19. Moustafa MM, Al-Janabi RD, Kasim AA. Association of age, parity and body mass index with hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in pregnant women in Baghdad city. Iraqi J Pharm Sci 2021;30(2):153–157. DOI: 10.31351/vol30iss2pp153-157
  20. Al-Saadi A. Oral health condition and salivary constituents (zinc, copper, calcium, iron and total protein) among the selected overweight primary school children. A master thesis, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. 2009.
  21. Mohammed AI, Diab BS. Caries experience and salivary physicochemical characteristics among overweight intermediate school females aged 13-15 years in Babylon–Iraq. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2013;25(3):130–133. DOI: 10.12816/0015010
  22. Kadoum NA, Salih BA. Selected salivary constituents, physical properties and nutritional status in relation to dental caries among 4-5 year's old children (comparative study). J Bagh Coll Dent 2014;26(2):150–156. DOI: 10.12816/0015213
  23. Hemadi AS, Huang R, Zhou Y, et al. Salivary proteins and microbiota as biomarkers for early childhood caries risk assessment. Int J Oral Sci 2017;9(11):e1. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2017.35
  24. Nurhikmah DD, Syah IS. Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide ll-37 as an antibacteria, antifungal, antiviral and wound healing agent. Farmaka 2018;16(1).
  25. Javaid MA, Ahmed AS, Durand R, et al. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2016;6(1):67–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.006
  26. Khurshid Z, Naseem M, Yahya I, et al. Significance and diagnostic role of antimicrobial cathelicidins (LL-37) peptides in oral health. Biomolecules 2017;7(4):80. DOI: 10.3390/biom7040080
  27. Greer A, Zenobia C, Darveau RP. Defensins and LL-37: a review of function in the gingival epithelium. Periodontol 2000 2013;63(1):67–79. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12028
  28. Wuersching SN, Huth KC, Hickel R, et al. Inhibitory effect of LL-37 and human lactoferricin on growth and biofilm formation of anaerobes associated with oral diseases. Anaerobe 2021;67:102301. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102301
  29. Grassi L, Maisetta G, Esin S, et al. Combination strategies to enhance the efficacy of antimicrobial peptides against bacterial biofilms. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2409. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02409
  30. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. World Health Organization; 2013.
  31. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Measuring salivary flow: challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:35S–40S. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0353
  32. de Carvalho FK, de Queiroz AM, da Silva LA, et al. Oral aspects in celiac disease children: clinical and dental enamel chemical evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;119(6):636–643. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.02.483
  33. Gudipaneni RK, Albilasi RM, HadiAlrewili O, et al. Association of body mass index and waist circumference with dental caries and consequences of untreated dental caries among 12- to 14-year-old boys: a cross-sectional study. Int Dent J 2021;71(6):522–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.009
  34. Bakhshi M, Sabet MS, Hashemi E, et al. Evaluation of biochemical changes in unstimulated salivary, calcium, phosphorous and total protein during pregnancy. Afr J Biotechnol 2012;11(8):2078–2083. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.2104
  35. Van Nieuw Amerongen A, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC. Salivary proteins: protective and diagnostic value in cariology? Caries Res 2004;38(3):247–253. DOI: 10.1159/000077762
  36. Smirnova MP, Kolodkin NI, Kolobov AA, et al. Indolicidin analogs with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and low hemolytic activity. Peptides 2020;132:170356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170356
  37. Theodoridis C, Doulkeridou C, Menexes G, et al. Comparison of RANKL and OPG levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid between healthy and diseased peri-implant tissues. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2021;26(1):823–826. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04061-w
  38. Zanetti M, Gennaro R, Scocchi M, et al. Structure and biology of cathelicidins. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;479:203–218. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-46831-X_17
  39. Angarita-Díaz MP, Simon-Soro A, Forero D, et al. Evaluation of possible biomarkers for caries risk in children 6 to 12 years of age. J Oral Microbiol 2021;13(1):1956219. DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2021.1956219
  40. Malcolm J, Sherriff A, Lappin DF, et al. Salivary antimicrobial proteins associate with age-related changes in streptococcal composition in dental plaque. Mol Oral Microbiol 2014;29(6):284–293. DOI: 10.1111/omi.12058
  41. Colombo NH, Ribas LF, Pereira JA, et al. Antimicrobial peptides in saliva of children with severe early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol 2016;69:40–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.05.009
  42. Al-Ali GM, Jafar Z, Al-Ghurabi BH. The relation of salivary cathelicidin and beta-defensin with dental caries of schoolchildren. J Res Med Dent Sci 2021;9(4):30–35.
  43. Dale BA, Tao R, Kimball JR, et al. Oral antimicrobial peptides and biological control of caries. BMC Oral Health 2006;6(1):S13. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S13
  44. Davidopoulou S, Diza E, Menexes G, et al. Salivary concentration of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in children. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57(7):865–869. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.01.008
  45. Tao R, Jurevic RJ, Coulton KK, et al. Salivary antimicrobial peptide expression and dental caries experience in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49(9):3883–3888. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3883-3888.2005
  46. Pannunzio E, Amancio OM, Vitalle MS, et al. Analysis of the stimulated whole saliva in overweight and obese school children. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2010;56(1):32–36. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000100012
  47. Rabiei M, Maddah M, Ghamgosar M. Correlation Assessment of unstimulated whole saliva flow rate with anthropometric indices. JIDA 2016;2828(44):134–141. DOI: 10.30699/jidai.29.4.134
  48. Roa I, Del Sol M. Obesity, salivary glands and oral pathology. Colomb Med (Cali) 2018;49(4):280–287. DOI: 10.25100/cm.v49i3.3919
  49. Bakkal M, Kargul B. The differential electrophoretic patterns of statherin and histatins in caries-active and caries-free children. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2018;4(3):365–370. DOI: 10.22271/oral.2018.v4.i3f.05
  50. Bhalla S, Tandon S, Satyamoorthy K. Salivary proteins and early childhood caries: a gel electrophoretic analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1(1):17–22. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.62515
  51. Phattarataratip E, Olson B, Broffitt B, et al. Streptococcus mutans strains recovered from caries-active or caries-free individuals differ in sensitivity to host antimicrobial peptides. Mol Oral Microbiol 2011;26(3):187–199. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00607.x
  52. Vitorino R, de Morais Guedes S, Ferreira R, et al. Two-dimensional electrophoresis study of in vitro pellicle formation and dental caries susceptibility. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114(2):147–153. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00328.x
  53. Ramezani J, Khaligh MR, Ansari G, et al. Association of salivary physicochemical characteristics and peptide levels with dental caries in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2021;39(2):189–195. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_251_20
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.