World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Analysis of the Parental Data to Predict Facial Soft Tissue Growth in Offsprings

Faisal Arshad, Prashanth Chikkanayakanahalli Shivashankar, Amarnath Bangalore Chikkamuniswamy, Shashi Kumar Hassan Channaveerappa

Keywords : Offspring growth, Parental data, Soft tissue growth

Citation Information : Arshad F, Shivashankar PC, Chikkamuniswamy AB, Channaveerappa SK. Analysis of the Parental Data to Predict Facial Soft Tissue Growth in Offsprings. World J Dent 2023; 14 (2):136-144.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2191

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-04-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether the parental data can be used in the prediction of the soft tissue growth in offspring, which can guide in forecasting the growth pattern and the degree of similarity in parents and offspring. This study focuses on whether parental data can be a deciding factor in orthodontic treatment planning. Materials and methods: A sample consisting of 40 class I and II cases aged 9–14 years based on Angle's classification was taken. Frontal and profile photographs of the subjects, along with the photographs of the parents, were taken in a standardized position according to ABO guidelines. The photographs were analyzed using custom-made software for various frontal and profile analyzes to check for the degree of similarity by heritability coefficient and Pearson correlation test. Results: The results revealed a degree of similarity between offspring and parents, which was statistically significant. Class I males and females, class II females had the greater resemblance of the facial features with their father as compared to their mother having a total of 9, 5, and 9 positive correlations, respectively while class II males had more resemblance toward mothers with four positive correlation and higher heritable coefficient. Conclusion: Parental data can be effectively used for predicting facial soft tissue growth in offspring and can serve as a guide in treatment planning in orthodontics. This study can be useful in forensic sciences also, apart from Orthodontic treatment planning. Clinical significance: The results of this study signify that growth forecasting and treatment planning in growing children requiring orthodontic treatment can be done by analyzing the parental data at the start of treatment.


PDF Share
  1. Markovic MD. At the crossroads of oral facial genetics. Eur J Orthod 1992;14(6):469–481. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/14.6.469
  2. Corruccini RS, Potter RH. Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins. Am J Orthod 1980;78(2):140–154. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90056-1
  3. Lundström A, McWilliam J. The influence of heredity and environment on six variables describing incisor orientation. Eur J Orthod 1986;8(4):259–264. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/8.4.259
  4. Boraas JC, Messer LB, Till MJ. A genetic contribution to dental caries, occlusion, and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J Dent Res 1988;67(9):1150–1155. DOI: 10.1177/00220345880670090201
  5. King L, Harris EF, Tolley EA. Heritability of cephalometric and occlusal variables as assessed from siblings with overt malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104(2):121–131. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81001-7
  6. Rubbrecht O. A study of the heredity of the anomalies of the jaws. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1939;25(8):751–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-6347(39)90224-3
  7. Harris JE, Kowalski CJ. All in the family: use of familial information in orthodontic diagnosis, case assessment, and treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1976;69(5):493–510. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(76)80022-x
  8. Harris JE, Kowalski CJ, Walker SJ. Intrafamilial dentofacial associations for class II, Division 1 probands. Am J Orthod 1975;67(5):563–570. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90301-2
  9. Wylie WL. A quantitative method for comparison of craniofacial patterns in different individuals: Its application to a study of parents and offspring. Am J Anat 2005;74(1):39–60. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1000740103
  10. Stein KF, Kelley TJ, Wood E. Influence of heredity in the etiology of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1956;42(2):125–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(56)90073-2
  11. Chung CS, Niswander JD, Runck DW, et al. Genetic and epidemiologic studies of oral characteristics in Hawaii's schoolchildren. II. Maloclussion. Am J Hum Genet 1971;23(5):471–495.
  12. Chung CS, Niswander JD. Genetic and epidemiologic studies of oral characteristics in Hawaii's schoolchildren: V. Sibling correlations in occlusion traits. J Dent Res 1975;54(2):324–329.
  13. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, et al. Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod 2007;77(5):759–765. DOI: 10.2319/082606-349
  14. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, et al. Soft tissue facial morphology related to headform: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis in childhood. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1997;17(2):86–95.
  15. Carlson DS. Theories of craniofacial growth in the postgenomic era. Semin Orthod 2005;11(4):172–183. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.07.002
  16. Williams SE, Slice DE. Regional shape change in adult facial bone curvature with age. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010;143(3):437–447. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21332
  17. Aksakalli S, Demir A. The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:200–207.
  18. Gelgör EI, Karaman AI, Zekiç E. The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents. The Scientific World Journal 2013:1–7.
  19. Saunders SR, Popovich F, Thompson GW. A family study of craniofacial dimensions in the Burlington Growth Centre sample. Am J Orthod 1980;78(4):394–403. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90020-2
  20. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53(4):262–284. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90022-x
  21. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84(1):1–28. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90144-6
  22. Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod 1959;45(7):481–507. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4
  23. www.americanboardortho.com
  24. Stutts WF. Clinical photography in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod 1978;74(1):1–31. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90042-8
  25. Samawi S. Clinical digital photography in orthodontics: professional photographic records in daily practice. Jordan Dent J 2012;18(1):25–28.
  26. Tanner JM, Goldstein H, Whitehouse RH. Standards for children's height at ages 2-9 years allowing for height of parents. Arch Dis Child 1970;45(244):755–762. DOI: 10.1136/adc.45.244.755
  27. Lahoti SK, Karia AM, Lahoti KB, et al. Heritability of facial characteristics between parents and offsprings: a photographic study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2013;47(4):419–425. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1199
  28. Patil BC, Vairage A, Patil V, et al. Comparative evaluation of facial soft tissue characteristics inherited between parents and offspring – a photographic study in kalaburgi families. EJPMR 2017;4(6):609–618.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.