World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Penetration and Persistence of Sealer Residues in Retreated Dentinal Tubules

Karthik V Thomas, Prathap MS Nair, Vivian F D Costa, Jeslee A Jose, Nithin Suvarna

Keywords : AH Plus, BioRoot RCS, Confocal laser scanning microscopy, Depth of penetration, Sealapex

Citation Information : Thomas KV, Nair PM, D Costa VF, Jose JA, Suvarna N. Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Penetration and Persistence of Sealer Residues in Retreated Dentinal Tubules. World J Dent 2022; 13 (6):647-651.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2099

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 26-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: To compare the depth of penetration and persistence of sealer residues in obturated canals with three commercially available root canal sealers using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Methodology: Thirty single-rooted human premolars were selected and decoronated with diamond disks to standardize the root length at 14 mm. Access cavity and working length were determined; following which biomechanical preparation was carried out using rotary files in a crown-down manner. Copious irrigation was carried out during recapitulation so as to effectively debride the canal. Subsequently, the canals were dried and obturated using lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha (GP) sticks, coated with three categories of dye-incorporated sealers, that is, AH Plus, Sealapex, and BioRoot RCS. The teeth were coronally sealed and allowed to set for 2 weeks. All samples were reattended, sectioned 6 mm from the apex, and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: AH Plus sealer showed the highest depth of penetration followed by BioRoot RCS and Sealapex, respectively. Conclusion: The depth of penetration of sealers plays a pivotal role in the outcome of endodontic treatment. It is virtually impossible to remove the sealer residue of the contracted dentin tubules. However, complete removal is not an essential factor in follow-up treatment in endodontics. Clinical significance: The study provides insights into selection of appropriate sealer to achieve optimal penetration and retrievability clinically.

PDF Share
  1. El Hachem R, Khalil I, Le Brun G, et al. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23(4):1871–1876. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6
  2. Silva RV, Silveira FF, Horta MC, et al. Filling effectiveness and dentinal penetration of endodontic sealers: a stereo and confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Braz Dent J 2015;26(5):541–546. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201300138
  3. Al-Haddad A, Ab Aziz C, Zeti A. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater 2016;2016(4):1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9753210
  4. Chandra SS, Shankar P, Indira R. Depth of penetration of four resin sealers into radicular dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study. J Endod 2012;38(10):1412–1416. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.017
  5. D'Costa VF, Rodrigues AL, Bangera MK, et al. A confocal microscopic study on percentage penetration of different sealers into dentin. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2021;13(Suppl 1):S725–S730. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_646_20
  6. Tedesco M, Chain MC, Bortoluzzi EA, et al. Comparison of two observational methods, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies, in the adhesive interface analysis of endodontic sealers to root dentine. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(6):2353–2361. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2336-y
  7. McMichael GE, Primus CM, Opperman LA. Dentinal tubule penetration of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod 2016;42(4):632–636. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012
  8. Kim H, Kim E, Lee SJ, et al. Comparisons of the retreatment efficacy of calcium silicate and epoxy resin-based sealers and residual sealer in dentinal tubules. J Endod 2015;41(12):2025–2030. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.030
  9. Amoroso-Silva PA, Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, et al. Microscopic analysis of the quality of obturation and physical properties of MTA Fillapex. Microsc Res Tech 2014;77(12):1031–1036. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22432
  10. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C. Properties of a novel polysiloxane-guttapercha calcium silicate-bioglass-containing root canal sealer. Dent Mater 2016;32(5):e113–e126. DOI: 10.1016/
  11. Dash AK, Farista S, Dash A, et al. Comparison of three different sealer placement techniques: an in vitro confocal laser microscopic study. Contemp Clin Dent 2017;8(2):310–314. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_1109_16
  12. Kosaraju D, Bolla N, Garlapati RD, et al. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris using rotary and reciprocating single file systems: an in vitro study. Int J App Dent Sci 2020;6(3):307–313.
  13. Kok D, Rosa RA, Barreto MS, et al. Penetrability of AH plus and MTA fillapex after endodontic treatment and retreatment: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 2014;77(6):467–471. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22371
  14. Donnermeyer D, Bunne C, Schäfer E, et al. Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(2):811–817. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2156-5
  15. Eymirli A, Sungur DD, Uyanik O, et al. Dentinal tubule penetration and retreatability of a calcium silicate-based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core material. J Endod 2019;45(8):1036–1040. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.010
  16. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, et al. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(1):19–26. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19
  17. Dash AK, Dash A, Thakur JS, et al. Comparative evaluation of flow rate of four different endodontic sealers: an in vitro study. J Endod 2020;32(2):96–99. DOI: 10.4103/endo.endo_33_19
  18. Gharib SR, Tordik PA, Imamura GM, et al. A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of the epiphany obturation system. J Endod 2007;33(8):957–961. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.011
  19. Ersev H, Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, et al. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2012;45(8):756–762. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02032.x
  20. Sfeir G, Zogheib C, Patel S, et al. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a narrative review and clinical perspectives. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(14):3965. DOI: 10.3390/ma14143965
  21. D'Costa VF, Bangera MK, Kutty SM. Coronal seal in endodontics. Int J Curr Res 2017;9(4):49499–49502.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.